Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Water use and light interception under Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) and corn competition

  • Rafael A. Massinga, Randall S. Currie (a1) and Todd P. Trooien (a2)
Abstract

A study was conducted near Garden City, KS, under irrigated conditions to determine the effect of full-season Palmer amaranth infestation on corn water use efficiency and light interception in a fully developed corn canopy. Palmer amaranth at densities of 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 plants m−1 was established at corn planting in 1996 and 1997 and at two locations in 1998. Soil water was monitored 240 cm deep in 30-cm increments with a neutron probe each year and at each location every 10 d. Photosynthetic photon flux was measured in 1997 and 1998 by using a circular and a linear quantum sensor for above canopy and in four 50-cm increments for within canopy, respectively. Palmer amaranth reduced corn yield from 11 to 91% as density increased from 0.5 to 8 plants m−1. Water use efficiency of corn declined with increased Palmer amaranth density. Regardless of Palmer amaranth density, soil water extraction was greatest in the top 30 cm of the soil profile. The pattern of corn leaf area distribution was similar across Palmer amaranth densities, with 15, 70 to 75, and 5 to 15% of the total leaf area occurring 1.5 m, 0.5 to 1.5 m, and 0 to 0.5 m above the ground, respectively. In weed-free corn, over 60% of light was intercepted from 0.5 to 1.5 m above the ground. In contrast, in mixed canopies 60 to 80% of light was intercepted 1 m above the ground, where 80% of Palmer amaranth leaf area was concentrated. Under the conditions of this study, water was not a limiting factor. The effect of Palmer amaranth density on total light interception was not significant. However, within each treatment, light interception at different heights differed, emphasizing the importance of evaluating the vertical distribution of light through the canopy to assess the effect of weed height on light competition.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Corresponding author. Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506-5501; rafaelm@ksu.edu
References
Hide All
Akey, W. C., Jurrik, T. W., and Dekker, J. 1990. Competition for light between a velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) and soybean (Glycine max). Weed Res. 30:403411.
Aldrich, R. J. and Kremer, R. J. 1997. Principles in Weed Management. 2nd ed. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press. pp. 177181.
Almarras, R. R., Nelson, W. W., and Voorhees, W. B. 1975. Soybean and corn rooting in southwest Minnesota: II. Root distributions and related water inflow. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 39:771777.
Black, C. C. Jr., Chen, T. M., and Brown, R. H. 1969. Biochemical basis for plant competition. Weed Sci. 17:338344.
Clegg, M. D., Biggs, W. W., Eastin, J. D., Maranville, J. W., and Sullivan, C. Y. 1974. Light transmission in field communities of sorghum. Agron. J. 66:471476.
Cousens, R. 1985. A simple model relating yield loss to weed density. Ann. Appl. Biol. 107:239252.
Cudney, D. W., Jordan, L. S., and Hall, A. E. 1991. Effect of wild oat (Avena fatua) infestations on light interception and growth rate of wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Sci. 39:175179.
Davis, R. G., Johnson, W. C., and Wood, F. O. 1967. Weed root profiles. Agron. J. 59:555556.
Davis, R. G., Wiese, A. F., and Pafford, J. L. 1965. Root extraction profiles of various weeds. Weeds 13:98100.
Follet, R. F., Almarras, R. R., and Reichman, G. A. 1974. Distribution of corn roots in sandy soil with a declining water table. Agron. J. 66:288292.
Foth, H. D. 1962. Root and top growth of corn. Agron. J. 54:4952.
Graham, P. L., Steiner, J. L., and Wiese, A. F. 1988. Light absorption and competition in mixed sorghum-pigweed communities. Agron. J. 80:415418.
Holt, J. S. 1995. Plant responses to light: a potential tool for weed management. Weed Sci. 43:474482.
Holt, J. S. and Orcutt, D. R. 1991. Functional relationships of growth and competitiveness in perennial weeds and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci. 39:575584.
Horak, M. J. 1997. The changing nature of Palmer amaranth: a case study. Proc. N. Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 52:161.
Horak, M. J. and Loughin, T. M. 2000. Growth analysis of four amaranthus species. Weed Sci. 48:347355.
Horak, M. J., Peterson, D. E., Chessman, D. J., and Wax, L. M. 1994. Pigweed Identification: A Pictorial Guide to Common Pigweed in the Great Plains. Manhattan, KS: Kansas State University S-80 Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service. pp. 19.
Keeley, P. E., Carter, C. H., and Thullen, R. J. 1987. Influence of planting date on growth of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri). Weed Sci. 35:199204.
Keeley, P. E. and Thullen, R. J. 1989. Growth of black nightshade (Solanum nigrum) and Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci. 37:326334.
Klingaman, T. E. and Oliver, L. R. 1994. Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) interference in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 42:523527.
Massinga, R. A., Currie, R. S., Horak, M. J., and Boyer, J. Jr. 2001. Interference of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 49:202208.
McGiffen, M. E. Jr., Masiunas, J. B., and Hesketh, J. D. 1992. Competition for light between tomatoes and nightshades (Solanum nigrum or S. ptycanthum). Weed Sci. 40:220226.
Radosevich, S., Holt, J., and Ghersa, C. 1997. Weed Ecology: Implications for Management. 2nd ed. New York: J. Wiley. pp. 260266.
Rogers, D. 1994. Irrigation. Pages 328 In Corn Production Handbook. Manhattan: Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service.
Spitters, C. J. and Aerts, R. 1983. Simulation of competition for light and water in crop-weed associations. Asp. Appl. Biol. 4:467483.
Wiese, A. F. 1968. Rate of weed root elongation. Weed Sci. 16:1113.
Wiese, A. F. and Vandiver, C. W. 1970. Soil moisture effects on competitive ability of weeds. Weed Sci. 18:518519.
Wiles, L. J. and Wilkerson, G. G. 1991. Modeling competition for light between soybean and broad leaf weeds. Agric. Syst. 35:3751.
Zimdahl, R. L. 1993. Fundamentals of Weed Science. San Diego, CA: Academic. pp. 119121.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Weed Science
  • ISSN: 0043-1745
  • EISSN: 1550-2759
  • URL: /core/journals/weed-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 4 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 100 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 20th January 2017 - 12th June 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.