Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-7jgsp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T16:17:42.869Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Application Timing of Metribuzin, Chlorimuron, and Imazaquin for Common Cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) Control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Richard A. Wesley Jr. ,
David R. Shaw  and
William L. Barrentine
Richard A. Wesley Jr.
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol. Weed Sci., Miss. State Univ., Mississippi State, MS 39762
David R. Shaw
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol. Weed Sci., Miss. State Univ., Mississippi State, MS 39762
William L. Barrentine
Affiliation:
Delta Branch, Miss. Agric. For. Exp. Stn., Stoneville, MS 38776
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted in 1986 and 1987 to evaluate the effect of herbicide rate (two-thirds and maximum labeled rate) and timing of application before soybean planting on common cocklebur control. In 1986, chlorimuron plus metribuzin at 50 plus 320 and 80 plus 480 g ai/ha and imazaquin at 90 g ai/ha applied at planting controlled common cocklebur better than when applied 4 weeks before planting (WBP). Imazaquin at 140 g/ha applied at planting controlled common cocklebur better than when applied 6 WBP. All treatments at two-thirds of the labeled rate applied at planting controlled common cocklebur comparable to the full labeled rate applied 2, 4, or 6 WBP. In 1987, all treatments applied 2 WBP controlled common cocklebur better than when applied 4, 6, or 8 WPB.

Keywords

Chlorimuron, 2-[[[[(4-chloro-6-methoxy-2-pyrimidinyl)amino] carbonyl] amino] sulfonyl] benzoic acidimazaquin, 2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-1H-imidazol-2-yl]-3-quinolinecarboxylic acidmetribuzin, 4-amino-6-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-3-(methylthio)-1,2,4-triazin-5(4H)-onecommon cocklebur, Xanthium strumarium L. #3 XANSTsoybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr.Early preplantGlycine maxXANST

Information

Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , June 1989 , pp. 364 - 368
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Allen, D. R., and Banks, P. A. 1984. Evaluation of DPX F-6025 for broadleaf weed control in soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 37:73.Google Scholar
2. Baldwin, F. L. 1986. Extension's experiences with “New” soybean herbicides in Arkansas. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 40:355.Google Scholar
3. Basham, G. W., and Lavy, T. L. 1987. Microbial and photolytic dissipation of imazaquin in soil. Weed Sci. 35:865–870.Google Scholar
4. Basham, G., Lavy, T. W., Oliver, L. R., and Scott, H. D. 1987. Imazaquin persistence and mobility in three Arkansas soils. Weed Sci. 35:576–582.Google Scholar
5. Beyer, E. M., Duffy, M. J., Hay, J. V., and Schlueter, D. D. 1987. Sulfonyl urea herbicides. p. 117–190 in Kearney, P. C. and Kaufman, D. D., ed. Herbicides: Chemistry, Degradation, and Mode of Action, Vol. 3. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
6. Chaleff, R. S., and Mauvais, C. J. 1984. Acetolactate synthase is the site of action of the herbicides chlorsulfuron and sulfometuron methyl in higher plants. Science 224:1443–1445.Google Scholar
7. Cheng, H. H., and Lehmann, R. G. 1985. Characterization of herbicide degradation under field conditions. Weed Sci. 33(Suppl. 2):7–10.Google Scholar
8. Duffy, M. J., Strek, H. T., Dulka, J. J., and Linn, D. M. [1989]. The effect of soil on plant response to chlorimuron ethyl. Weed Technol. 3:(in press).Google Scholar
9. Green, J. M., Obrigawitch, T. T., Long, J. D., and Hutchison, J. M. 1988. Metribuzin and chlorimuron mixtures for preemergence broadleaf weed control in soybeans, Glycine max . Weed Technol. 2:355–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Martin, J. R., Baldwin, F. L., and French, C. M. 1986. Extension's experience with “New” preemerge soybean herbicides. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 40:354.Google Scholar
11. Morton, C. S., Hammes, G. G., Patterson, K. A., Crowder, S. H., Edwards, M. T., Maxcy, F. B., Seay, R. E., and Gillham, L. B. 1984. A new broadleaf herbicide for soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 37:74.Google Scholar
12. Retzinger, E. J., Rogers, R. L., and Richard, P. A. 1984. Weed control in soybeans with AC-252,214. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 37:71.Google Scholar
13. Risley, M. A., and Oliver, L. R. 1984. Influence of application methods of AC-252,214 on a spectrum of weed species. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 37:72.Google Scholar
14. Savage, K. E. 1977. Metribuzin persistence in soil. Weed Sci. 25:55–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Shaner, D. H., and Robson, P. A. 1985. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of AC-252,214 in soybeans (Glycine max), common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium), and velvetleaf (Abutilon tbeophrasti). Weed Sci. 33:469–471.Google Scholar
16. Shaner, D. H., Anderson, P. C., and Stidham, M. A. 1984. Imadazolinones – potent inhibitors of acetohydroxyacid synthase. Plant Physiol. 76:545–546.Google Scholar