Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-bvgqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T04:27:54.238Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Rate, Carrier Volume, and Surfactant on Imazamethabenz Efficacy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Bill D. Brewster  and
Arnold P. Appleby
Bill D. Brewster
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop Sci., Oreg. State Univ., Corvallis, OR 97331
Arnold P. Appleby
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop Sci., Oreg. State Univ., Corvallis, OR 97331
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Imazamethabenz is a selective herbicide used to control wild oat in small grains. The effects of rate, volume of carrier, and surfactant concentration on the efficacy of this herbicide in controlling wild oat were studied in field experiments. As each of the variables increased, wild oat control increased; the greatest degree of wild oat growth inhibition occurred at the highest herbicide rate, highest volume of carrier, and highest surfactant concentration.

Keywords

Imazamethabenz, 2-(4-isopropyl-4-methyl-5-oxo-2-imidazolin-2-yl)-p-toluate mixture with 6-(4-isopropyl-4-methyl-5-oxo-2-imidazolin-2-yl)-m-toluate, methyl esterwild oat, Avena fatua L. ♯3 AVEFAAvena fatuawild oatAVEFAimidazolinone

Information

Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , June 1990 , pp. 291 - 293
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Bell, A. R., and Nalewaja, J. D. 1968. Competition of wild oat in wheat and barley. Weed Sci. 16:505–508.Google Scholar
2. Buhler, D. D., and Burnside, O. C. 1983. Effect of water quality, carrier volume, and acid on glyphosate phytotoxicity. Weed Sci. 31:163–169.Google Scholar
3. Buhler, D. D., and Burnside, O. C. 1984. Effect of application factors on postemergence phytotoxicity of fluazifop-butyl, haloxyfop-methyl, and sethoxydim. Weed Sci. 32:574–583.Google Scholar
4. Carlson, K. L., and Burnside, O. C. 1984. Comparative phytotoxicity of glyphosate, SC-0224, SC-0545, and HOE-0661. Weed Sci. 32:841–844.Google Scholar
5. Foy, C. L., and Smith, L. W. 1969. The role of surfactants in modifying the activity of herbicidal sprays. p. 55–69 in Gould, R. F., ed. Pesticidal Formulations Research. Am. Chem. Soc. Adv. Chem. Ser. 86, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
6. Jansen, L. L. 1964. Surfactant enhancement of herbicide entry. Weeds 12:251–255.Google Scholar
7. Miller, S. D., and Page, M. S. 1986. Wild oat control in spring wheat with AC 222,293 alone and in combination with broadleaf herbicides. Res. Prog. Rep., West Soc. Weed Sci. p. 222.Google Scholar
8. McKinlay, K. S., Ashford, R., and Ford, R. J. 1974. Effects of drop size, spray volume, and dosage on paraquat toxicity. Weed Sci. 22:31–34.Google Scholar
9. Nalewaja, J. D. 1977. Wild oaf global gloom. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 30:21–32.Google Scholar