Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T10:40:24.678Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Preemergence and Postemergence Control of Triazine-Resistant Common Lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) in No-Till Corn (Zea mays)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Ronald L. Ritter  and
Hiwot Menbere
Ronald L. Ritter*
Affiliation:
Department of Natural Resource Sciences and Landscape Architecture, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742-5821
Hiwot Menbere
Affiliation:
Department of Natural Resource Sciences and Landscape Architecture, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742-5821
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: rr24@umail.umd.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field studies were conducted from 1997 to 1999 in Westminster, MD, to evaluate a variety of preemergence (PRE) and postemergence (POST) herbicide programs on crop injury and control of triazine-resistant common lambsquarters (TR-CHEAL) in no-till corn. In 1997 PRE studies, combinations of metolachlor with flumetsulam or halosulfuron and high rates of rimsulfuron + thifensulfuron (0.02 + 0.009 kg ai/ha) injured corn most 4 weeks after treatment (WAT), averaging 11 to 15%. In 1998 and 1999, metolachlor plus a high rate of halosulfuron (0.07 kg/ha) injured corn most 4 WAT, averaging 13 and 10%, respectively. High rates of rimsulfuron + thifensulfuron also provided a higher level of corn injury in 1998 and 1999 in comparison with many of the other treatments. However, for all three years of the study, no injury was observed from any PRE treatment 8 WAT. In 1997 and 1998, at 8 WAT, combinations of metolachlor with flumetsulam or halosulfuron provided greater TR-CHEAL control than many of the other treatments, averaging 98 and 100%, respectively. In 1999, however, control of TR-CHEAL with these same treatments did not vary in comparison with most of the other treatments. At 8 WAT, there was a trend for increased TR-CHEAL control as the rates of RPA-201772 and rimsulfuron + thifensulfuron increased. Control of TR-CHEAL with metolachlor + atrazine + pendimethalin varied across years 8 WAT. Similar observations were made 16 WAT. In 1997, POST applications of dicamba, SAN 1269H at 0.3 lb ai/ha, primisulfuron + dicamba, and primisulfuron + CGA 152005 + dicamba provided the highest level of TR-CHEAL control 8 WAT, averaging 93, 93, 95, and 93%, respectively. In 1998, with the exception of carfentrazone + atrazine, all POST treatments provided 90% control of TR-CHEAL or better 8 WAT. In 1999, POST applications of SAN 1269H at 0.3 kg/ha, pyridate + atrazine, and primisulfuron + CGA 152005 + pyridate provided the highest level of TR-CHEAL control, averaging 80, 90, and 96%, respectively, 8 WAT. With the exception of carfentrazone + atrazine, control of TR-CHEAL with the other POST treatments varied in 1999 from 60 to 74% 8 WAT. Carfentrazone + atrazine applied POST provided the lowest level of TR-CHEAL control 8 WAT averaging 28, 37, and 17% for 1997 to 1999, respectively.

Keywords

AtrazinecarfentrazonedicambaflumetsulamhalosulfuronRPA-201772 (proposed name, isoxaflutole) [5-cyclopropyl-4-(2-methylsulfonyl-4-trifluoromethyl-benzoyl)isoxazole]metolachlorpendimethalinCGA 152005 (proposed name, prosulfuron) {1-(4-methoxy-6-methyltriazin-2-yl)-3-[2-(3,3,3-trifluoropropyl)-phenylsulfonyl] urea}rimsulfuronSAN 1269H (formerly BAS 662H), a mixture of SAN 835H {2-[1-[[[(3,5-difluorophenyl)amino]carbonyl]hydrozono]ethyl]-3-pyridinecarboxylic acid} and dicamba in a 1:2.5 ratiothifensulfuron methylcommon lambsquarters, Chenopodium album L. # CHEALcorn, Zea mays L. Pioneer 3140Herbicide-resistant weedsPRE, preemergencePOST, postemergenceTR-AMACH, triazine-resistant smooth pigweedTR-CHEAL, triaizine-resistant common lambsquartersTS-CHEAL, triazine-susceptible common lambsquartersWAT, weeks after treatment
Type
Note
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 15 , Issue 4 , December 2001 , pp. 879 - 884
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Ahrens, H. W., ed. 1994. Herbicide Handbook. 7th ed. Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America. pp. Champaign, IL31, 207, 282.Google Scholar
Bandeen, J. D., Stephenson, G. R., and Cowett, E. R. 1982. Discovery and distribution of herbicide-resistant weeds in North America. In LeBaron, H. M. and Gressel, J., eds. Herbicide Resistance in Plants. New York: Wiley-Interscience, pp. 9–30.Google Scholar
Bettini, P., McNally, S., Sevignac, M., Darmency, H., Gasquez, J., and Dron, M. 1987. Atrazine resistance in Chenopodium album . Plant Physiol. 84: 1,442–1,446.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bhowmik, P. C., Kushwaha, S., and Mitra, S. 1999. Response of various weed species and corn (Zea mays) to RPA 201772. Weed Technol. 13: 504–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuerst, E. P., Barrett, M., and Penner, D. 1986. Control of triazine-resistant common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) and two pigweed species (Amaranthus spp.) in corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 34: 440–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gasquez, J., Mouemar, A. A., and Darmency, H. 1985. Triazine herbicide resistance in Chenopodium album L.: occurrence and characteristics of an intermediate biotype. Pestic. Sci. 16: 392–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glenn, S., Phillips, W. H. II, and Kalnay, P. 1997. Long-term control of perennial broadleaf weeds and triazine-resistant common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) in no-till corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 11: 436–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagood, E. S. 1989. Control of triazine-resistant smooth pigweed (Amaranthus hybridus) and common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) in no-till corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 3: 136–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatzios, K. K., ed. 1998. Herbicide Handbook Supplement 7th ed. Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America. p. 60.Google Scholar
Heap, I. 2000. 1999 International survey of herbicide resistant weeds. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 40:43.Google Scholar
Khan, S. U., Warwick, S. I., and Marriage, P. B. 1985. Atrazine metabolism in resistant and susceptible biotypes of Chenopodium album L., Chenopodium strictum Roth., and Amaranthus powellii S. Wats. Weed Res. 25: 33–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marose, B. H. 1985. Triazine-resistant weed survey in Maryland. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 39:114.Google Scholar
Myers, M. G. and Harvey, R. G. 1993. Triazine-resistant common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album L.) control in field corn (Zea mays L.). Weed Technol. 7: 884–889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parks, R. J., Curran, W. S., Roth, G. W., Hartwig, N. L., and Calvin, D. D. 1995. Common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) control in corn (Zea mays) with postemergence herbicides and cultivation. Weed Technol. 9: 728–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parochetti, J. V., Schnappinger, M. G., Ryan, G. F., and Collins, H. A. 1982. Practical significance and means of control of herbicide-resistant weeds. In LeBaron, H. M. and Gressel, J., eds. Herbicide Resistance in Plants. New York: Wiley-Interscience. pp. 309–323.Google Scholar
Ryan, G. F. 1970. Resistance of common groundsel to simazine and atrazine. Weed Sci. 18: 614–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sikkema, P. H., Knezevic, S. Z., Hamil, A. S., Tardif, F. J., Chandler, K., and Swanton, C. J. 1999. Biologically effective dose and selectivity of SAN 1269H (BAS 662H0) for weed control in corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 13: 283–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprague, C. L., Kells, J. J., and Penner, D. 1999. Weed control and corn (Zea mays) tolerance from soil-applied RPA 201772. Weed Technol. 13: 713–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephenson, G. R., Dykstra, M. D., McLaren, R. D., and Hamill, A. S. 1990. Agronomic practices influencing triazine-resistant weed distribution in Ontario. Weed Technol. 4: 199–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vencill, W. K. and Foy, C. L. 1988. Distribution of triazine-resistant smooth pigweed (Amaranthus hybridus) and common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) in Virginia. Weed Sci. 36: 497–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, B.G., Hart, S. E., and Simmons, F. W. 1999. Preemergence weed control in conventional-till corn (Zea mays) with RPA 201772. Weed Technol. 13: 471–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar