Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-pnlb5 Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2025-10-30T05:14:56.020Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response of Japanese Stiltgrass (Microstegium vimineum) to Application Timing, Rate, and Frequency of Postemergence Herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Caren A. Judge ,
Joseph C. Neal  and
Jeffrey F. Derr
Caren A. Judge*
Affiliation:
Department of Horticultural Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7609
Joseph C. Neal
Affiliation:
Department of Horticultural Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7609
Jeffrey F. Derr
Affiliation:
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Hampton Roads Agricultural Research and Extension Center, 1444 Diamond Springs Road, Virginia Beach, VA 23455-3315
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: carrie_judge@ncsu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Japanese stiltgrass is a nonnative invasive grass that occurs in a variety of habitats and is widely distributed throughout the eastern United States. In natural areas such as forests, herbicide options that selectively control Japanese stiltgrass while preserving native herbaceous and woody vegetation may be desired. The efficacy of three selective postemergence herbicides (fenoxaprop-P, imazapic, and sethoxydim) applied early season, midseason, or late season on monoculture understory stands of Japanese stiltgrass in forests was examined in an experiment conducted at a site in North Carolina and a site in Virginia from 2002 to 2004. The herbicides, averaged across application timings, controlled Japanese stiltgrass at the end of the growing season 83 to 89% and seedhead production 79 to 94% compared with nontreated plants. Seedling emergence was reduced in the spring of 2004 by 89, 70, and 78% by fenoxaprop-P, imazapic, and sethoxydim, respectively, applied in 2003. In another experiment at the North Carolina site in 2002 and 2003, fenoxaprop-P or sethoxydim applied twice (4 wk apart) at half-registered rates controlled Japanese stiltgrass. This study demonstrates that land managers have multiple POST herbicide and application timing, rate, and frequency options for Japanese stiltgrass control.

Keywords

Fenoxaprop-PimazapicsethoxydimJapanese stiltgrass, Microstegium vimineum (Trin.) A. Camus # MCGVMInvasive plantannual jewgrassbamboograssflexible sesagrassJapanese grassMary's grassNepalese browntop1Xmaximum use rate

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 19 , Issue 4 , December 2005 , pp. 912 - 917
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous. 2003a. Acclaim Extra herbicide specimen label. Research Triangle Park, NC: Bayer CropScience. 10 p.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 2003b. Plateau herbicide specimen label. Research Triangle Park, NC: BASF Corp. 10 p.Google Scholar
Barden, L. S. 1987. Invasion of Microstegium vimineum (Poaceae), an exotic, annual, shade-tolerant, C4 grass, into a North Carolina floodplain. Am. Midl. Nat. 118:40–45.Google Scholar
Brown, W. V. 1977. The Kranz syndrome and it subtypes in grass systematics. Mem. Torrey Bot. Club 23:1–97.Google Scholar
Chism, W. J. and Bingham, S. W. 1991. Postemergence control of large crabgrass (Digitaria sanguinalis) with herbicides. Weed Sci. 39:62–66.Google Scholar
Drake, S. J., Weltzin, J. F., and Parr, P. D. 2003. Assessment of non-native invasive plant species on the United States Department of Energy Oak Ridge National Environmental Research Park. Castanea 68:15–30.Google Scholar
Fairbrothers, D. E. and Gray, J. R. 1972. Microstegium vinineum (Trin.) A. Camus (Gramineae) in the United States. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 99:97–100.Google Scholar
Gibson, D. J., Spyreas, G., and Benedict, J. 2002. Life history of Microstegium vimineum (Poaceae), an invasive grass in southern Illinois. J. Torrey Bot. Soc. 129:207–219.Google Scholar
Gover, A. E., Johnson, J. M., Kuhns, L. J., and Burton, D. A. 2003. Pre- and postemergence control comparisons for Japanese stiltgrass. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 57:28–33.Google Scholar
Hunt, D. M. and Zaremba, R. E. 1992. The northeastward spread of Microstegium vimineum (Poaceae) into New York and adjacent states. Rhodora 94:167–170.Google Scholar
Judge, C. A., Neal, J. C., and Derr, J. F. 2005. Preemergence and postemergence control of Japanese stiltgrass (Microstegium vimineum). Weed Technol. 19:183–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, J. H. 2003. Nonnative Invasive Plants of Southern Forests: A Field Guide for Identification and Control. Gen. Tech. Report SRS-62. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Southern Research Station. 93 p.Google Scholar
Neal, J. C., Bhowmik, P. C., and Senesac, A. F. 1990. Factors influencing fenoxaprop efficacy in cool-season turfgrass. Weed Technol. 4:272–278.Google Scholar
Neal, J. C., Judge, C. A., and Derr, J. F. 2004. Summary of control options for Japanese stiltgrass. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 58:173–174.Google Scholar
Norcini, J. G., Aldrich, J. H., and Martin, F. G. 2003. Tolerance of native wildflower seedlings to imazapic. J. Environ. Hort. 21:68–72.Google Scholar
Redman, D. E. 1995. Distribution and habitat types for Nepal Microstegium [Microstegium vimineum (Trin.) Camus] in Maryland and the District of Columbia. Castanea 60:270–275.Google Scholar
[SAS]. 1999. Statistical Analysis Systems. 1999. SAS/STAT User's Guide. Version 8. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 3884 p.Google Scholar
Senesac, A. 1994. Flexible sesagrass (Microstegium vimineum var. variabilis) control in shaded turf. In: Weed Control in Turfgrass and Ornamentals 1994 Data Summary. Weed Sci. Res. Report 10. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University. Pp. 40–41.Google Scholar
Tu, M. 2000. Elemental stewardship abstract for Microstegium vimineum . Arlington, VA: The Nature Conservancy. Pp. 1–9. http://tncweeds.ucdavis.edu/esadocs/documnts/micrvim.html. Accessed August 16, 2004.Google Scholar
USDA, NRCS. 2004. The PLANTS database, version 3.5. (http://plants.usda.gov). Baton Rouge, LA: National Plants Data Center.Google Scholar
Vencill, W. K. 2002. Herbicide Handbook, 8th ed. Lawrence, KS: Weed Sci. Soc. Am., Champaigne, IL. Pp. 180–182, 249–250, 393–395.Google Scholar
Vidra, R. L. 2004. Implications of exotic species invasion for restoration of urban riparian forests. Ph.D. dissertation. North Carolina State University, Department of Forestry, Raleigh, NC. 110 pp.Google Scholar
Williams, L. D. 1998. Factors affecting growth and reproduction in the invasive grass Microstegium vimineum . MS thesis. Appalachian State University, Department of Biology, Boone, NC. 57 pp.Google Scholar
Winter, K., Schmitt, M. R., and Edwards, G. E. 1982. Microstegium vimineum, a shade adapted C4 [carbon pathway] grass [comparison of growth with Digitaria sanguinalis and Sporobolus airoides]. Plant Sci. Lett. 24:311–318.Google Scholar
Woods, F. W. 1989. Control of Paulownia tomentosa and Microstegium vimineum in National Parks: A Report to The Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Knoxville, TN: The University of Tennessee. Pp. 1–24.Google Scholar