Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-c8zdz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T22:23:16.442Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response of Soybean to Combinations of Clomazone, Metribuzin, Linuron, Alachlor, and Atrazine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Frederick P. Salzman  and
Karen A. Renner
Frederick P. Salzman
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop and Soil Sci., Michigan State Univ., E. Lansing 48824
Karen A. Renner
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop and Soil Sci., Michigan State Univ., E. Lansing 48824
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field observations in 1986 indicated that increased injury to soybean could occur from clomazone plus metribuzin and clomazone plus linuron compared with metribuzin or linuron alone. Field experiments to measure this response were conducted in 1988, 1989, and 1990 at two locations in Michigan. Atrazine at 0, 1120, 2240, and 3360 g ha-1 was applied the year previous to soybean planting to determine if atrazine residues in the soil influenced soybean response. Herbicide treatments in soybean included clomazone, metribuzin, linuron, alachlor, clomazone plus metribuzin or linuron, alachlor plus metribuzin or linuron, and an untreated control. Additive and synergistic responses in soybean to clomazone plus linuron and clomazone plus metribuzin, regardless of atrazine application rate, occurred in some field environments. Experiments in the greenhouse demonstrated that soybean shoot weight was reduced synergistically from clomazone plus metribuzin compared with either herbicide alone, and the response was greater on a soil with 2.5% organic matter compared with a soil with 4.4% organic matter. Clomazone plus metribuzin reduced leaf area and shoot dry weight, regardless of placement, while leaf area and shoot dry weight were reduced more when clomazone plus linuron- and atrazine plus metribuzin-treated soil was placed in the same zone as the soybean seed. The synergistic interaction in soybean to clomazone plus metribuzin occurred under both cool and warm temperature regimes in growth chamber studies.

Keywords

Alachlor, 2-chloro-N-(2,6-diethylphenyl)-N-(methoxymethyl)acetamideatrazine, 6-chloro-N-ethyl-N′-(1-methylethyl)-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diamineclomazone, 2-[(2-chlorophenyl)methyl]-4,4-dimethyl-3-isoxazolidinonelinuron, N′-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-N-methoxy-N-methylureametribuzin, 4-amino-6-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-3-(methylthio)-l,2,4-triazin-5(4H)-onesoybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Century’Temperatureherbicide placementsynergistic interaction

Information

Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 6 , Issue 4 , December 1992 , pp. 922 - 929
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Boger, P. and Schlue, U. 1976. Long-term effects of herbicides on the photosynthetic apparatus. I. Influence of diuron, triazines, and pyridazinones. Weed Res. 16:149–154.Google Scholar
2. Colby, S. R. 1967. Calculating synergistic and antagonistic responses of herbicide combinations. Weeds 15:20–22.Google Scholar
3. Draber, W., Buchel, K. H., Dickore, K., Tiebst, A., and Pistorius, E. 1969. Structure-activity correlation of 1,2,4-triazinones, a new group of photosynthetic inhibitors. Prog. Photosyn. Res. 2:1789–1795.Google Scholar
4. Dunigan, E. P., Frey, J. P., Allen, L. D. Jr., and McMahon, A. 1972. Herbicide effects on the nodulation of Glycine max (L.) Merrill. Agron. J. 64:806–808.Google Scholar
5. Fink, R. J. and Fletchall, O. H. 1969. Soybean injury from triazine residues in soil. Weed Sci. 17:35–36.Google Scholar
6. Hamill, A. S. and Penner, D. 1973. Interaction of alachlor and carbofuran. Weed Sci. 21:330–335.Google Scholar
7. Ladlie, J. S., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1977. Effect of atrazine on soybean tolerance to metribuzin. Weed Sci. 25:115–121.Google Scholar
8. Peter, C. J. and Weber, J. B. 1985. Adsorption, mobility, and efficacy of metribuzin as influenced by soil properties. Weed Sci. 33:868–873.Google Scholar
9. Salzman, F. P., Renner, K. A., and Penner, D. 1992. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of clomazone, metribuzin, and linuron in soybean (Glycine max) and common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium). Weed Sci. 40:395–401.Google Scholar
10. Sandmann, G. and Boger, P. 1987. Interconversion of phenyl pyrophosphates and subsequent reactions in the presence of FMC 57020. Z. Naturforsch. 42c:803–807.Google Scholar
11. Sharom, M. S. and Stephenson, G. R. 1976. Behavior and fate of metribuzin in eight Ontario soils. Weed Sci. 24:153–160.Google Scholar
12. Smith, A. E. 1981. Comparison of solvent systems for the extraction of atrazine, benzoylprop, flamprop, and trifluralin from weathered field soils. J. Agric. Food Chem. 29:111–115.Google Scholar
13. Wax, L. M. 1977. Incorporation depth and rainfall on weed control in soybeans with metribuzin. Agron. J. 69:107–110.Google Scholar
14. Werling, V. L. and Buhler, D. D. 1988. Influence of application time on clomazone activity in no-till soybeans, Glycine max . Weed Sci. 36:629–635.Google Scholar
15. Westberg, D. E., Oliver, L. R., and Frans, R. E. 1989. Weed control with clomazone alone and with other herbicides. Weed Technol. 3:678–685.Google Scholar