Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-19T03:50:59.961Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Silage corn yield is reduced by burcucumber competition and drought in New York State

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 October 2021

Kristine M. Averill
Affiliation:
Research Associate, Section of Soil and Crop Sciences, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
Anna S. Westbrook
Affiliation:
Graduate Student, Section of Soil and Crop Sciences, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
Scott H. Morris
Affiliation:
Research Technician, Section of Soil and Crop Sciences, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
Emma Kubinski
Affiliation:
Research Assistant, Section of Soil and Crop Sciences, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
Antonio DiTommaso*
Affiliation:
Professor, Section of Soil and Crop Sciences, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Antonio DiTommaso, 903 Bradfield Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA. Email: ad97@cornell.edu

Abstract

Drought stress and weed competition are two of the most important threats to corn production in the northeastern United States. Both pressures have the potential to worsen under climate change. In a 2-yr field study in Ithaca, NY, we tested the effects of drought and burcucumber, an increasingly problematic annual vine, on silage corn. Burcucumber seedlings were transplanted into corn rows at densities of 0, 0.5, 2, and 3 plants m−2 and a drought treatment was later imposed with rainout shelters constructed from steel frames and high-clarity plastic. Available soil moisture was lower in drought plots (47% ± 1% in 2018 and 52% ± 2% in 2019) than no-drought plots (69% ± 1% in 2018 and 68% ± 1% in 2019). Burcucumber planting density (P = 0.008) reduced fresh silage yield. Drought also reduced fresh silage yield (P < 0.001) with a drought-by-year interaction (P = 0.007): drought reduced fresh weight by 29% in 2018 (48,000 ± 2,000 kg ha−1 to 34,000 ± 3,000 kg ha−1) and by 9% in 2019 (38,000 ± 3,000 kg ha−1 to 34,000 ± 3,000 kg ha−1). Burcucumber planting density and drought did not interact. Overall, our findings indicate that drought and competition from burcucumber may have additive effects on silage corn in New York State. Regardless of water availability, active weed management is required to prevent yield losses due to burcucumber. Yield losses may be similar or greater in grain corn and might increase under climate change.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Weed Science Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor: Aaron Hager, University of Illinois

References

Archontoulis, S, Licht, M (2017) How fast and deep do corn roots grow in Iowa? Iowa State University Extension and Outreach. https://crops.extension.iastate.edu/cropnews/2017/06/how-fast-and-deep-do-corn-roots-grow-iowa. Accessed January 11, 2021Google Scholar
Britton, NL, Brown, A (1913) An Illustrated Flora of the Northern United States, Canada and the British Possessions, from Newfoundland to the Parallel of the Southern Boundary of Virginia, and from the Atlantic Ocean Westward to the 102d Meridian. New York: Scribner. 652 pCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buhler, DD (2002) Challenges and opportunities for integrated weed management. Weed Sci 50:273280 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CABI (2019) Sicyos angulatus (burcucumber) datasheet. Invasive Species Compendium. https://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/49978. Accessed: January 25, 2021Google Scholar
Chaves, MM, Oliveira, MM (2004) Mechanisms underlying plant resilience to water deficits: prospects for water-saving agriculture. J Exp Bot 55:23652384 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DiTommaso, A, Buck, EM, Riha, SJ, McDonald, A (2012) Geographic and bioclimatic distribution of troublesome field crop weeds in the northeastern U.S. Proceedings of the Weed Science Society of America Annual Meeting. Waikoloa, HI, February 6–9, 2012Google Scholar
DiTommaso, A, Zhong, Q, Clements, DR (2014) Identifying climate change as a factor in the establishment and persistence of invasive weeds in agricultural crops. Pages 253–270 in JS Dukes, LH Ziska, eds. Invasive Species and Global Climate Change. Wallingford, UK: CAB International Google Scholar
Ehleringer, JR, Monson, RK (1993) Evolutionary and ecological aspects of photosynthetic pathway variation. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 24:411439 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esbenshade, WR, Curran, WS, Roth, GW, Hartwig, NL, Orzolek, MD (2001a) Effect of establishment date and crop competition on burcucumber fecundity. Weed Sci 49:524527 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esbenshade, WR, Curran, WS, Roth, GW, Hartwig, NL, Orzolek, MD (2001b) Effect of row spacing and herbicides on burcucumber (Sicyos angulatus) control in herbicide-resistant corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol 15:348354 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization (2010) EPPO data sheet on invasive alien plants: Sicyos angulatus. EPPO Bull 40:401406 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farooq, S, Tad, S, Onen, H, Gunal, H, Caldiran, U, Ozaslan, C (2017) Range expansion potential of two co-occurring invasive vines to marginal habitats in Turkey. Acta Oecol 84:2333 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, L (1994) The maize root. Pages 29–37 in M Freeling, V Walbot, eds. The Maize Handbook. New York, NY: Springer Google Scholar
Fike, D (2020) Crop progress and condition: New York. Week ending October 11, 2020. https://www.nass.usda.gov/Statistics_by_State/New_York/Publications/Crop_Progress_&_Condition/2020/NYCW_1013.pdf. Accessed: January 27, 2021Google Scholar
Gibson, KD, Johnson, WG, Hillger, DE (2005) Farmer perceptions of problematic corn and soybean weeds in Indiana. Weed Technol 19:10651070 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, SB, Strellner, RS, Puthuval, KK, Ng, C, Shulman, RE, Siebers, MH, Rogers, A, Leakey, ADB (2013) Minirhizotron imaging reveals that nodulation of field-grown soybean is enhanced by free-air CO2 enrichment only when combined with drought stress. Funct Plant Biol 40:137147 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hartzler, B (2015) Bumper crop of weedy cucumbers. https://crops.extension.iastate.edu/blog/bob-hartzler/bumper-crop-weedy-cucumbers. Accessed: January 27, 2021Google Scholar
Hayhoe, K, Wake, CP, Huntington, TG, Luo, L, Schwartz, MD, Sheffield, J, Wood, E, Anderson, B, Bradbury, J, DeGaetano, A, Troy, TJ, Wolfe, D (2007) Past and future changes in climate and hydrological indicators in the US Northeast. Clim Dyn 28:381407 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, MC, Kemanian, AR, Mortensen, DA (2021) Cover crop effects on maize drought stress and yield. Agric Ecosyst Environ 311:107294 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, S, Thoday-Kennedy, E, Joshi, S, Vakani, J, Hughes, J, Maphosa, L, Sadler, A, Menidis, M, Slater, A, Spangenberg, G (2017) Automated rainout shelter’s design for well-defined water stress field phenotyping of crop plants. Crop Sci 57:327331 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korres, N, Norsworthy, J, Tehranchian, P, Gitsopoulos, T, Loka, D, Oosterhuis, D, Gealy, D, Moss, S, Burgos, N, Miller, MR, Palhano, M (2016) Cultivars to face climate change effects on crops and weeds: a review. Agron Sustain Dev 36:12 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leakey, ADB, Ferguson, JN, Pignon, CP, Wu, A, Jin, Z, Hammer, GL, Lobell, DB (2019) Water use efficiency as a constraint and target for improving the resilience and productivity of C3 and C4 crops. Ann Rev Plant Biol 70:781808 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lu, J, Carbone, GJ, Huang, X, Lackstrom, K, Gao, P (2020) Mapping the sensitivity of agriculture to drought and estimating the effect of irrigation in the United States, 1950–2016. Agr Forest Meteorol 292–293:108124 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, J (1995) Root architecture and plant productivity. Plant Physiol 109:713 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mann, RK, Rieck, CE, Witt, WW (1981) Germination and emergence of burcucumber (Sicyos angulatus). Weed Sci 29:8386 Google Scholar
McDonald, A, Riha, S, DiTommaso, A, DeGaetano, A (2009) Climate change and the geography of weed damage: analysis of U.S. maize systems suggests the potential for significant range transformations. Agric Ecosyst Environ 130:131140 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McFadden, J, Smith, D, Wechsler, S, Wallander, S (2019) Development, Adoption, and Management of Drought-Tolerant Corn in the United States. EIB-204. USDA Economic Research Service. 45 pGoogle Scholar
Messersmith, D, Curran, WS, Lingenfelter, DD (1998) Managing burcucumber in agronomic crops. Penn State Extension Agronomy Facts 59. https://extension.psu.edu/managing-burcucumber-in-agronomic-crops. Accessed: January 25, 2021Google Scholar
Messersmith, DT, Curran, WS, Hartwig, NL, Orzolek, MD, Roth, GW (1999) Evaluation of several herbicides for burcucumber (Sicyos angulatus) control in corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol 13:520524 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messersmith, DT, Curran, WS, Roth, GW, Hartwig, NL, Orzolek, MD (2000) Tillage and herbicides affect burcucumber management in corn. Agron J 92:181185 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mojzes, A, Ónodi, G, Lhotsky, B, Kalapos, T, Kröel-Dulay, G (2020) Experimental drought indirectly enhances the individual performance and the abundance of an invasive annual weed. Oecologia 193:571581 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Northeast Regional Climate Center (2021) CLIMOD 2. http://climod2.nrcc.cornell.edu/. Accessed: January 25, 2021Google Scholar
Önen, H, Farooq, S, Tad, S, Özaslan, C, Gunal, H, Chauhan, BS (2018) The influence of environmental factors on germination of burcucumber (Sicyos angulatus) seeds: implications for range expansion and management. Weed Sci 66:494501 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ordóñez, RA, Castellano, MJ, Hatfield, JL, Helmers, MJ, Licht, MA, Liebman, M, Dietzel, R, Martinez-Feria, R, Iqbal, J, Puntel, LA, Córdova, SC, Togliatti, K, Wright, EE, Archontoulis, SV (2018) Maize and soybean root front velocity and maximum depth in Iowa, USA. Field Crops Res 215:122131 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, DT (1995) Effects of environmental stress on weed/crop interactions. Weed Sci 43:483490 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prasad, R, Gunn, SK, Rotz, CA, Karsten, H, Roth, G, Buda, A, Stoner, AMK (2018) Projected climate and agronomic implications for corn production in the northeastern United States. PLoS One 13:e0198623 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
R Core Team (2021) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing Google Scholar
Ramesh, K, Matloob, A, Aslam, F, Florentine, SK, Chauhan, BS (2017) Weeds in a changing climate: vulnerabilities, consequences, and implications for future weed management. Front Plant Sci 8:95 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rashid, MH, Uddin, MN, Sarkar, A, Parveen, M, Asaeda, T (2019) The growth and nutrient uptake of invasive vines on contrasting riverbank soils. River Res Appl 35:749758 Google Scholar
Smeda, RJ, Weller, SC (2001) Biology and control of burcucumber. Weed Sci 49:99105 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swanton, CJ, Weise, SF (1991) Integrated weed management: the rationale and approach. Weed Technol 5:657663 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweet, SK, Wolfe, DW, DeGaetano, A, Benner, R (2017) Anatomy of the 2016 drought in the northeastern United States: implications for agriculture and water resources in humid climates. Agr Forest Meteorol 247:571581 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations FAO (2020) FAOSTAT rankings. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#rankings/countries_by_commodity. Accessed: January 25, 2021Google Scholar
[USDA-NASS] U.S. Department of Agriculture–National Agricultural Statistics Service (2020) 2019 State Agriculture Overview: New York. https://www.nass.usda.gov/Quick_Stats/Ag_Overview/stateOverview.php?state=NEW%20YORK. Accessed: January 25, 2021Google Scholar
[USDA-NRCS] U.S. Department of Agriculture–Natural Resources Conservation Service (2018) Web Soil Survey. https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/HomePage.htm. Accessed: May 14, 2018Google Scholar
[USDA-NRCS] U.S. Department of Agriculture–Natural Resources Conservation Service (2021) PLANTS Database. https://plants.usda.gov/java. Accessed: January 25, 2021Google Scholar
[USGCRP] U.S. Global Change Research Program (2017) Climate Science Special Report: Fourth National Climate Assessment, Volume I. Washington, DC:USGCRP. 470 pGoogle Scholar
VanGessel, M, Johnson, Q (2019) Burcucumber control in cropland. University of Delaware Cooperative Extension Weed Facts WF-4. https://www.udel.edu/content/dam/udelImages/canr/pdfs/extension/weed-science/WF4-Burcumber_19.pdf. Accessed: January 27, 2021Google Scholar
Varanasi, A, Prasad, PVV, Jugulam, M (2016) Impact of climate change factors on weeds and herbicide efficacy. Pages 107–146 in DL Sparks, ed. Advances in Agronomy, Volume 135. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press Google Scholar
Virginia Tech [CALS] College of Agriculture and Life Sciences (n.d.) Burcucumber. Weed Identification. https://weedid.cals.vt.edu/profile/51. Accessed: January 25, 2021Google Scholar
Webb, F, Johnston, G (1981) Control of burcucumber in corn and soybeans. Page 34 in Proceedings of the 35th Northeastern Weed Science Society Meeting. Salisbury, MD: Northeastern Weed Science SocietyGoogle Scholar
Wolfe, DW, DeGaetano, AT, Peck, GM, Carey, M, Ziska, LH, Lea-Cox, J, Kemanian, AR, Hoffmann, MP, Hollinger, DY (2018) Unique challenges and opportunities for northeastern US crop production in a changing climate. Clim Change 146:231245 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziska, LH, Dukes, J (2011) Weed Biology and Climate Change. Wiley-Blackwell. 246 p Google Scholar