Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-s6l46 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T03:12:50.566Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Row Spacing, Seeding Rate, and Cultivar Affect Interference from Rye (Secale cereale)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

John R. Roberts ,
Thomas F. Peeper  and
John B. Solie
John R. Roberts
Affiliation:
Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078
Thomas F. Peeper*
Affiliation:
Department of Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078
John B. Solie
Affiliation:
Department of Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: tfp@mail.pss.okstate.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two field experiments were conducted in Oklahoma to determine whether changing wheat row spacing, seeding rate, and cultivar would reduce interference from rye. Wheat row spacing did not affect rye seed production. Averaged over row spacing, increasing wheat seeding rate from 67 to 134 kg/ha reduced rye seed production 21 and 25% in two experiments. At one site, grain yield of rye-infested wheat was increased 27 and 23% by doubling wheat seeding rate in 10- and 20-cm rows. Doubling the seeding rate of rye-infested wheat in 30-cm rows did not increase wheat yield. At a second site when data were pooled over row spacings, increasing the wheat seeding rate from 67 to 101 kg/ha increased yield of rye-infested wheat 21%, but yield was still 36% less than for rye-free wheat. In two additional experiments, rye seeds in harvested wheat were reduced 36% by increasing the wheat seeding rate from 60 to 162 kg/ha, whereas yield of rye-infested wheat was increased 82%. Nine cultivars were compared for competitive ability against rye in four experiments. Of 32 possible cultivar location situations, the rye-induced yield loss of ‘Jagger’ wheat was less than 16 other cultivar location situations, whereas the yield loss of ‘Triumph 64’ wheat was less than 10 other cultivar location situations. Mature wheat height, wheat yield, and wheat maturity classification were each negatively correlated to rye yield in infested wheat at two of four sites. Wheat plant density, head density, sunlight interception, and fall cover capability classification were each negatively correlated to rye yield at one of four sites.

Keywords

Rye, Secale cereale L.wheat, Triticum aestivum L. ‘2163’, ‘2180’, ‘Agseco 7853’, ‘Jagger’, ‘Karl 92’, ‘Longhorn’, ‘TAM 107’, ‘TAM 202’, ‘Triumph 64’Winter wheatcompetitive abilityPARphotosynthetically active radiation

Information

Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , March 2001 , pp. 19 - 25
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

Bartlett, B. 1998. Oklahoma crop production. In Oklahoma Agricultural Statistics 1998. Oklahoma City: Oklahoma Agricultural Statistics Service. pp. 10–24.Google Scholar
Challaiah, O. C. Burnside, Wicks, G. A., and Johnson, V. A. 1986. Competition between winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) cultivars and downy brome (Bromus tectorum). Weed Sci. 34: 689–693.Google Scholar
Epplin, F. M., Fofana, N. F., Peeper, T. F., and Solie, J. B. 1996. Optimal wheat seeding rates for conventional and narrow rows for cheat-free and cheatinfested fields. J. Prod. Agric. 9: 265–270.Google Scholar
Justice, G. G., Peeper, T. F., Solie, J. B., and Epplin, F. M. 1993. Net returns from cheat (Bromus secalinus) control in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Technol. 7: 459–464.Google Scholar
Kelley, J. P. 1998. Impact of Cultural Practices on Jointed Goatgrass cylindrica) in Wheat (Triticum aestivum). . Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK. 35 p.Google Scholar
Kelley, J. P., Krenzer, E. G., and Peeper, T. F. 1997. Effect of wheat cultivar on interference from jointed goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrica). Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 50:45.Google Scholar
Koscelny, J. A., Peeper, T. F., Solie, J. B., and Solomon, S. G. Jr. 1990. Effect of wheat (Triticum aestivum) row spacing, seeding rate, and cultivar on yield loss from cheat (Bromus secalinus). Weed Technol. 4: 487–492.Google Scholar
Koscelny, J. A., Peeper, T. F., Solie, J. B., and Solomon, S. G. Jr. 1991. Seeding date, seeding rate, and row spacing affect wheat (Triticum aestivum) and cheat (Bromus secalinus). Weed Technol. 5: 707–712.Google Scholar
Lemerle, D., Verbeek, B., Cousens, R. D., and Coombes, N. E. 1996. The potential for selecting wheat varieties strongly competitive against weeds. Weed Res. 36: 505–513.Google Scholar
Lyon, D. J. and Klein, R. N. 1994. Controlling Volunteer Rye In Winter Wheat. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Cooperative Extension NebGuide G94-1225-A. 4 p.Google Scholar
Ogg, A. G. and Seefeldt, S. S. 1999. Characterizing traits that enhance the competitiveness of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) against jointed goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrica). Weed Sci. 47: 74–80.Google Scholar
Oswalt, R. M. 1946. The Oklahoma Farm Wheat Improvement Program: Progress Report, 1938-1945. Stillwater, OK: Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station Miscellaneous Publication MP-9. 18 p.Google Scholar
Rydrych, D. J. 1987. Cereal Rye Competition in Winter Wheat in Eastern Oregon. Research Progress Report of the Western Society of Weed Science. p. 335.Google Scholar
Schneweis, D. A., Northam, F. E., and Stahlman, P. W. 1993. Volunteer rye (Secale cereale) interference in winter wheat. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 48:6.Google Scholar
Seefeldt, S. S., Ogg, A. G., and Yuesheng, H. 1999. Near-isogenic lines for Triticum aestivum height and crop competitiveness. Weed Sci. 47: 316–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snaydon, R. W. 1984. Plant demography in an agricultural context. In Dirzo, R. and Sarukhan, J., eds. Perspectives on Plant Population Ecology. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer. pp. 389–407.Google Scholar
Stahlman, P. W. and Northam, F. E. 1995. Weedy rye interference in winter wheat. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 50:64.Google Scholar
Stahlman, P. W. and Peterson, D. E. 1995. Winter annual grass survey in Kansas. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 50: 64–65.Google Scholar
Stump, W. L. and Westra, P. 1993. The effects of tillage on volunteer rye emergence and seed bank dynamics. 1993 Research Progress Report of the Western Society of Weed Science. p. 180.Google Scholar
Watson, S. 1999. Wheat Varieties for Kansas and the Great Plains. Topeka, KS: Lone Star Publishing. 119 p.Google Scholar