Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Benchmark Study: III. Survey on Changing Herbicide Use Patterns in Glyphosate-Resistant Cropping Systems

  • Joby M. Prince (a1), David R. Shaw (a1), Wade A. Givens (a1), Michael E. Newman (a1), Micheal D. K. Owen (a2), Stephen C. Weller (a3), Bryan G. Young (a4), Robert G. Wilson (a5) and David L. Jordan (a6)...
Abstract

Approximately 1,300 growers from 22 states were surveyed during 2010 to determine herbicide use. Cropping systems included continuous glyphosate-resistant corn, cotton, and soybean, and various combinations of these crops and rotations with non–glyphosate-resistant crops. The most commonly used herbicide for both fall and spring applications was glyphosate followed by synthetic auxin herbicides. Herbicide application in spring was favored over application in the fall. The percentage of growers in a glyphosate-only system was as high as 69% for some cropping systems. Excluding glyphosate, the most frequently used herbicides included photosystem II, mitotic, and protoporphyrinogen oxidase inhibitors. A higher percentage of growers integrated herbicides other than glyphosate during 2010 compared with 2005. Extensive educational efforts have promoted resistance management by increasing the diversity of herbicides in glyphosate-resistant cropping systems. However, a considerable percentage of growers continued use of only glyphosate from the period of 2005 to 2010, and this practice most likely will continue to exert a high level of selection for evolved glyphosate-resistant weed species.

En 2010, aproximadamente 1,300 agricultores en 22 estados fueron encuestados, para determinar el uso de herbicidas. Los sistemas de cultivo incluyeron la siembra continua de maíz, algodón y soya resistentes al glifosato, así como también, varias combinaciones de estos cultivos y rotaciones con cultivos no resistentes al glifosato. El herbicida más comúnmente usado para las aplicaciones de otoño y primavera fue glifosato seguido por herbicidas auxinas sintéticas. La aplicación de herbicidas en primavera fue más frecuentemente usada que la aplicación en el otoño. El porcentaje de agricultores usando un sistema de solo glifosato fue tan alto como 69% para algunos sistemas de cultivo. Excluyendo al glifosato, los herbicidas más frecuentemente usados incluyeron fotosistema II, mitóticos e inhibidores de la protoporfirinogen oxidasa. Durante 2010 en comparación con 2005, un mayor porcentaje de agricultores integraron a sus sistemas otros herbicidas además del glifosato. Extensos esfuerzos educativos han promovido el manejo de resistencia al incrementarse la diversidad de herbicidas en los sistemas de cultivos resistentes al glifosato. Sin embargo, un porcentaje considerable de agricultores continuó usando solamente glifosato durante el período de 2005 a 2010, y ésta práctica muy probablemente continuará ejerciendo un alto nivel de selección de especies de malezas evolucionadas resistentes al glifosato.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Corresponding author's E-mail: dshaw@research.msstate.edu
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

A. S. Culpepper 2006. Glyphosate-induced weed shifts. Weed Technol. 20:277281.

G. M. Dill , C. A. CaJacob , and S. R. Padgette 2008. Glyphosate-resistant crops: adoption, use and future considerations. Pest Manag. Sci. 64:326331.

L. P. Gianessi 2008. Review: Economic impacts of glyphosate-resistant crops. Pest Manag. Sci. 64:346352.

W. A. Givens , D. R. Shaw , W. G. Johnson , S. C. Weller , B. G. Young , R. G. Wilson , M. D. K. Owen , and D. Jordan 2009a. A grower survey of herbicide use patterns in glyphosate-resistant cropping systems. Weed Technol. 23:156161.

W. A. Givens , D. R. Shaw , G. R. Kruger , W. G. Johnson , S. C. Weller , B. G. Young , R. G. Wilson , M. D. K. Owen , and D. Jordan 2009b. Survey of tillage trends following the adoption of glyphosate-resistant crops. Weed Technol. 23:150155.

W. A. Givens , D. R. Shaw , and M. E. Newman 2011. Benchmark study on glyphosate-resistant cropping systems in the USA. III. Grower awareness, information sources, experiences, and management practices regarding glyphosate-resistant weeds. Pest Manag. Sci. 67:758770.

W. G. Johnson , M. D. K. Owen , G. R. Kruger , B. G. Young , D. R. Shaw , R. G. Wilson , J. W. Wilcut , D. L. Jordan , and S. C. Weller 2009. U.S. farmer awareness of glyphosate-resistant weeds and resistance management strategies. Weed Technol. 23:308312.

G. R. Kruger , W. G. Johnson , S. C. Weller , M. D. K. Owen , D. R. Shaw , J. W. Wilcut , D. L. Jordan , R. G. Wilson , M. L. Bernards , and B. G. Young 2009. U.S. grower views on problematic weeds and changes in weed pressure in glyphosate-resistant corn, cotton, and soybean cropping systems. Weed Technol. 23:162166.

M. M. Loux , A. F. Doubels , W. G. Johnson , and B. G. Young 2011. Effect of residual herbicide and postemergence application timing on weed control in glyphosate-resistant corn. Weed Technol. 25:1924.

P. Neve , J. K. Norsworthy , K. L. Smith , and I. A. Zelaya 2011. Modeling glyphosate resistance management strategies for Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in cotton. Weed Technol. 25:335343.

M. D. K. Owen 2008. Weed species shifts in glyphosate-resistant crops. Pest Manag. Sci. 64:377387.

M. D. K. Owen , B. G. Young , D. R. Shaw , R. G. Wilson , D. L. Jordan , P. M. Dixon , and S. C. Weller 2011. Benchmark study on glyphosate-resistance crop systems in the United States. Part 2: perspectives. Pest Manag. Sci. 67:747757.

B. A. Scott and M. J. VanGessel 2007. Delaware soybean grower survey on glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis). Weed Technol. 21:270274.

D. R. Shaw , W. A. Givens , L. A. Farno , P. D. Gerard , D. Jordan , W. G. Johnson , S. C. Weller , B. G. Young , R. G. Wilson , and M. D. K. Owen 2009. Using a grower survey to assess the benefits and challenges of glyphosate-resistant cropping systems for weed management in U.S. corn, cotton, and soybean. Weed Technol. 23:134149.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Weed Technology
  • ISSN: 0890-037X
  • EISSN: 1550-2740
  • URL: /core/journals/weed-technology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 5 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 66 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 20th January 2017 - 21st September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.