Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-p5m67 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-07T00:43:30.821Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Biotypes of Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) and Common Waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) are Resistant to Imazethapyr and Thifensulfuron

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Michael J. Horak  and
Dallas E. Peterson
Michael J. Horak
Affiliation:
Dep. of Agron., Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, KS 66506. Contribution #95-17-J from the Kansas Agric. Exp. Stn.
Dallas E. Peterson
Affiliation:
Dep. of Agron., Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, KS 66506. Contribution #95-17-J from the Kansas Agric. Exp. Stn.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Seeds of suspected herbicide-resistant Palmer amaranth and common waterhemp were collected in Clay County and Douglas County, KS, respectively. An experiment was established in a greenhouse to determine if these species had developed resistance to imazethapyr and thifensulfuron. Imazethapyr was applied pre- (PRE) and postemergence (POST) at 1×, 2×, 4×, and 8× the suggested use rate (70 g/ha), and thifensulfuron was applied POST at 1×, 2×, 4×, and 8× the suggested use rate (4.5 g/ha). Both species had developed resistance to all rates of these herbicides. The occurrence of resistance at the Clay County site (Palmer amaranth) fit the typical pattern for the development of herbicide resistance, i.e., multiple applications of the same class of herbicide for several years. However, the Douglas County (common waterhemp) site had a limited history of use of ALS-inhibiting herbicides and did not follow typical models of resistance development.

Keywords

Imazethapyr, 2-[4,5-dihydro4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-1H-imidazol-2-yl]-5-ethyl-3-pyridinecarboxylic acidthifensulfuron, 3-[[[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]-2-thiophenecarboxylic acidcommon waterhemp, Amaranthus rudis Sauer # AMATAPalmer amaranth, Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats. # AMAPAHerbicide resistance

Information

Type
Notes
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , March 1995 , pp. 192 - 195
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Great Plains Flora Association. 1986. Flora of the Great Plains. Univ. Press of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, p. 179–184.Google Scholar
2. Mayo, C. M., Horak, M. J., Peterson, D. E., and Boyer, J. E. 1995. Differential control of four Amaranthus species by six postemergence herbicides. Weed Technol. (in press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Regehr, D. L., Peterson, D. E., Ohlenbusch, P. D., Fick, W. H., Stahlman, P. W., and Kuhlman, D. K. 1994. Chemical Weed Control. Kansas Agric. Exp. Stn. Rep. of Progress #698.Google Scholar
4. SAS Institute Inc. 1989. SAS Users Guide: Basics Version 6.06 Ed., SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
5. Saari, L. L., Cotterman, J. C., and Thill, D. C. 1994. Resistance to acetolactate synthase-inhibitor herbicides. Powles, S. B. and Holton, J.A.M., eds. Herbicide Resistance in Plants. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL. p. 83–139.Google Scholar
6. Zimdahl, R. L. 1993. Fundamentals of Weed Science. Academic Press, Inc. San Diego, CA. p. 256–257.Google Scholar