Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Glyphosate-Resistant Waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) Control and Economic Returns with Herbicide Programs in Soybean

  • Travis R. Legleiter (a1), Kevin W. Bradley (a1) and Raymond E. Massey (a2)
Abstract

Field experiments were conducted in Platte County, Missouri, during 2006 and 2007 to evaluate PRE, POST, and PRE followed by (fb) POST herbicide programs for the control of glyphosate-resistant waterhemp in soybean. All PRE fb POST treatments resulted in at least 66 and 70% control of glyphosate-resistant waterhemp in 2006 and 2007, respectively. Control of glyphosate-resistant waterhemp was less than 23% with lactofen and acifluorfen in 2006, but at least 64% in 2007. Variability in control likely resulted from differences in trial locations and a population of protoporphyrinogen oxidase (PPO)–resistant waterhemp at the Platte County site in 2006 compared with 2007. In both years, glyphosate resulted in less than 23% control of glyphosate-resistant waterhemp and provided the least control of all herbicide programs. Programs containing PRE herbicides resulted in waterhemp densities of less than 5 plants/m2, whereas the POST glyphosate treatment resulted in 38 to 70 plants/m2. Waterhemp seed production was reduced at least 78% in all PRE fb POST programs, from 55 to 71% in POST programs containing lactofen and acifluorfen and by only 21% in the POST glyphosate treatment. Soybean yields corresponded to the level of waterhemp control achieved in both years, with the lowest yields resulting from programs that provided poorest waterhemp control. PRE applications of S-metolachlor plus metribuzin provided one of the highest net incomes in both years and resulted in $271 to $340/ha greater net income than the glyphosate-only treatment. Collectively, the results from these experiments illustrate the effectiveness of PRE herbicides for the control of glyphosate-resistant waterhemp in glyphosate-resistant soybean and the inconsistency of PPO-inhibiting herbicides or PPO-inhibiting herbicide combinations for the control of waterhemp populations with multiple resistance to glyphosate and PPO-inhibiting herbicides.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Corresponding author's E-mail: bradleyke@missouri.edu.
References
Hide All
C. N. Bensch , M. J. Horak , and D. Peterson 2003. Interference of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus), Palmer amaranth (A. palmeri), and common waterhemp (A. rudis) in soybean. Weed Sci 51:3743.

J. T. Dirks , W. G. Johnson , R. J. Smeda , W. J. Wiebold , and R. E. Massey 2000. Use of preplant sulfentrazone in no-till, narrow-row, glyphosate-resistant Glycine max . Weed Sci 48:628639.

A. G. Hager , L. M. Wax , G. A. Bollero , and F. W. Simmons 2002a. Common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis Sauer) management with soil-applied herbicides in soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.). Crop Prot 21:277283.

A. G. Hager , L. M. Wax , E. W. Stoller , and G. A. Bollero 2002b. Common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) interference in soybean. Weed Sci 50:607610.

W. G. Johnson , P. R. Bradley , S. E. Hart , M. L. Buesinger , and R. E. Massey 2000. Efficacy and economics of weed management in glyphosate-resistant corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol 14:5765.

T. R. Legleiter and K. W. Bradley 2008. Glyphosate and multiple herbicide resistance in waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) populations from Missouri. Weed Sci 56:582587.

K. N. Reddy and K. Whiting 2000. Weed control and economic comparisons of glyphosate-resistant, sulfonylurea-resistant, and conventional soybean (Glycine max) systems. Weed Technol 14:204211.

D. E. Shoup , K. Al-Khatib , and D. E. Peterson 2003. Common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) resistance to protoporphyrinogen oxidase-inhibiting herbicides. Weed Sci 51:145150.

L. E. Steckel and C. L. Sprague 2004. Late-season common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) interference in narrow- and wide-row soybean. Weed Technol 18:947952.

M. J. VanGessel 2001. Glyphosate-resistant horseweed in Delaware. Weed Sci 49:703705.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Weed Technology
  • ISSN: 0890-037X
  • EISSN: 1550-2740
  • URL: /core/journals/weed-technology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 6 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 37 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 20th January 2017 - 18th October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.