Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-14T15:02:50.743Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Doveweed (Murdannia nudiflora) response to metsulfuron-methyl, trifloxysulfuron-sodium, and bentazon combinations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 October 2019

Shaun M. Sharpe
Affiliation:
Postdoctoral Associate, University of Florida, Gulf Coast Research and Education Center, Wimauma FL, USA
Nathan S. Boyd*
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, University of Florida, Gulf Coast Research and Education Center, Wimauma FL, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Nathan S. Boyd, University of Florida, Gulf Coast Research and Education Center, 14625 County Road 672, Wimauma FL 33598. (Email: nsboyd@ufl.edu)

Abstract

Doveweed is a problematic weed species in many agricultural ecosystems as well as on roadsides and rights-of-way. Effective POST chemical control options for doveweed are limited in many cropping systems. Greenhouse studies were conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of metsulfuron-methyl dose and the impact of mixtures and sequential applications of either trifloxysulfuron-sodium or bentazon with metsulfuron-methyl for doveweed control. By 14 d after the initial treatment, applying 0.04 kg ai ha−1 metsulfuron-methyl, either once or sequentially, provided 100% control of doveweed. Application of trifloxysulfuron-sodium at 0.04 kg ai ha−1 alone or in mixture with metsulfuron-methyl (0.04 kg ha−1) did not provide consistent doveweed control nor did it reduce biomass. Trifloxysulfuron-sodium applied alone at 0.08 kg ha−1 or in a mixture with metsulfuron-methyl (0.04 kg ha−1) provided consistent doveweed control (>80%). A single application of bentazon (0.56 kg ai ha−1) was ineffective at controlling doveweed. A single application of the bentazon and metsulfuron-methyl mixture (0.56 + 0.04 kg ha−1, respectively) or sequential applications of either bentazon alone (0.56 kg ha−1) or in mixture with metsulfuron-methyl (0.04 kg ha−1) provided excellent doveweed control (100%) by 35 d after treatment. Overall, single applications of metsulfuron-methyl (0.02 to 0.17 kg ha−1) or mixtures of metsulfuron-methyl with trifloxysulfuron-sodium (0.04 + 0.08 kg ha−1, respectively) or bentazon (0.04 + 0.56 kg ha−1, respectively) controlled doveweed and may be useful for enhancing the control spectrum for other weeds. Sequential applications of the bentazon and metsulfuron-methyl mixture (0.56 + 0.04 kg ha−1, respectively) provided doveweed control and are a resistance-management strategy for doveweed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahmed, S, Opeña, JL, Chauhan, BS (2015) Seed germination ecology of doveweed (Murdannia nudiflora) and its implication for management in dry-seeded rice. Weed Sci 63:491501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anonymous (2015a) Tide MSM 60 DF herbicide product label. Label Code No.: TIC-HER842298. Irvine, CA: Tide International USA, Inc. 59 pGoogle Scholar
Anonymous (2015b) Envoke herbicide label. SCP 1132A-L1H 0913. Greensboro, NC: Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC. 42 pGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, JL, McCarty, LB, Powell, BA, McElroy, S, Yelverton, F, Estes, AG (2017) Postemergence control and glyphosate tolerance of doveweed (Murdannia nudiflora). Weed Technol 31:582589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, JL, Mccarty, LB, Yelverton, F, Mcelroy, S, Bridges, WC (2019) Doveweed (Murdannia nudiflora) response to environmental resource availability and cultural practices. Weed Sci 67:214220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckie, HJ (2006) Herbicide-resistant weeds: management tactics and practices. Weed Technol 20:793814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, JH (2004) A comparison of invasive and non-invasive dayflowers (Commelinaceae) across experimental nutrient and water gradients. Divers Distrib 10:387397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, JH, Winn, AA (2006) A comparison of plastic responses to competition by invasive and non-invasive congeners in the Commelinaceae. Biol Invasions 8:797807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chauhan, BS, Opeña, J (2012) Effect of tillage systems and herbicides on weed emergence, weed growth, and grain yield in dry-seeded rice systems. Field Crop Res 137:5669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colby, SR (1967) Calculating synergistic and antagonistic responses of herbicide combinations. Weeds 15:2022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flint, JL, Cornelius, PL, Barrett, M (1988) Analyzing herbicide interactions: a statistical treatment of Colby’s method. Weed Technol 2:304309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Global Diversity Information Facility (2017) Murdannia nudiflora (L.) Brenan. https://www.gbif.org/species/2764680. Accessed: October 21, 2019Google Scholar
Gowing, DP (1960) Comments on tests of herbicide mixtures. Weeds 8:379391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heap, I (2016) The International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. http://www.weedscience.org/. Accessed: June 18, 2018Google Scholar
MacGowan, JB, Langdon, KR (1989) Hosts of the rice root-knot nematode Meloidogyne graminicola. Nematology Circulars 172. Tallahassee, FL: Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services. 4 pGoogle Scholar
Pellegrini, M, Faden, RB, Almeida, RF (2016) Taxonomic revision of neotropical Murdannia Royle (Commelinaceae). PhytoKeys 74:3578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, LC, Neal, JC, Derr, JF (2010) Preemergence control of doveweed (Murdannia nudiflora) in container-grown nursery crops. J Environ Hort 28:812Google Scholar
Wilson, DG, Burton, MG, Spears, JF, York, AC (2006) Doveweed (Murdannia nudiflora) germination and emergence as affected by temperature. Weed Sci 54:10001003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, J, McCullough, PE (2016) Efficacy and fate of atrazine and simazine in doveweed (Murdannia nudiflora). Weed Sci 64:379388CrossRefGoogle Scholar