Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T22:28:08.082Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effect of Nicosulfuron Tank-Mixes and Time of Application on Sunrunner Peanut (Arachis hypogaea)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Terry A. Littlefield ,
Daniel L. Colvin ,
Barry J. Brecke  and
Lambert B. McCarty
Terry A. Littlefield
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
Daniel L. Colvin
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
Barry J. Brecke
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. & Educ. Cent., Jay, FL 32565
Lambert B. McCarty
Affiliation:
Dep. Environ. Hortic., Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments conducted in Marianna, Trenton, and Archer, FL in 1990 and 1991 investigated the effect of time of application of nicosulfuron and nicosulfuron mixtures on ‘Sunrunner’ peanut. Nicosulfuron was applied alone at 36 g ai/ha and in mixture with acifluorfen, bentazon, chlorimuron, chlorothalonil, fluazifop-P, imazethapyr, lactofen, or pyridate at 5, 7, or 9 weeks after planting (WAP). Applying nicosulfuron with chlorimuron, pyridate, or imazethapyr increased visible peanut injury and reduced yields more than nicosulfuron alone. Conversely, nicosulfuron applied with acifluorfen or lactofen was less injurious than nicosulfuron applied alone. Bentazon, chlorothalonil, and fluazifop-P generally did not influence phytotoxicity from nicosulfuron. Peanut tolerance to nicosulfuron increased with age.

Keywords

Acifluorfen, 5-[2-chloro-4-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy]-2-nitrobenzoic acidbentazon, 3-(1-methylethyl)-(1H)-2,1,3-benzothiadiazin-4(3H)-one 2,2-dioxidechlorimuron, 2-[[[[(4-chloro-6-methoxy-2-pyrimidinyl)amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]benzoic acidchlorothalonil, tetrachloroisophthalonitrilefluazifop-P, (R)-2-[4-[[5-(trifluoromethyl)-2-pyridinyl]oxy]phenoxylpropanoic acidimazethapyr, 2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-1H-imidazol-2-yl]-5-ethyl-3-pyridinecarboxylic acidlactofen, (±)-2-ethoxy-1-methyl-2-oxyethyl 5-[2-chloro-4-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy]-2-nitrobenzoatenicosulfuron, 2-[[[[(4,6-dimethoxy-2-pyrimidinyl)-amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]-N,N-dimethyl-3-pyridinecarboxamidepyridate, 0-(6-chloro-3-phenyl-4-pyridazinyl) S-octyl-carbonothioatepeanut, Arachis hypogaea L.Crop tolerancepeanut tolerance
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 9 , Issue 3 , September 1995 , pp. 568 - 573
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anonymous. 1994. Product Manual. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company. Wilmington, DE. p. 29–36 and 113–122.Google Scholar
2. Baerg, R. J., Witt, W. W., Green, J. D, Martin, J. R., and Slack, C. H. 1993. Control of annual grass and broadleaf weeds with nicosulfuron and primisulfuron. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 46:80.Google Scholar
3. Beyer, E. M. Jr., Duffy, J. M., Hay, J. V., and Schlueter, D. D. 1988. Chap. 3: Sulfonylureas, in Kearney, P. C. and Kaufman, D. D., eds. Herbicides: Chemistry, Degradation, and Mode of Action. Vol. 3. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
4. Bhowmik, P. C., O'Toole, B. M., and Andaloro, J. 1992. Effects of nicosulfuron on quackgrass (Elytriga repens) control in corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 6:52–56.Google Scholar
5. Boote, K. J. 1982. Growth stages of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Peanut Sci. 9:35–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Dobbels, A. F. and Kapusta, G. 1993. Postemergence weed control in corn (Zea mays) with nicosulfuron combinations. Weed Technol. 7:844–850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Dowler, C. C. 1992. Weed survey—southern states. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 45:397–399.Google Scholar
8. Harvey, R. G., Albright, J. W., Anthon, T. M., and Kutil, J. L. 1991. Annual weed control in field corn studies. Res. Rep. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 48:169.Google Scholar
9. Hicks, T. V., Wehtje, G. R., and Wilcut, J. W. 1990. Weed control in peanuts (Arachis hypogaea) with pyridate. Weed Technol. 4:493–495.Google Scholar
10. Johnson, W. C. III, Holbrook, C. C., Mulilinix, B. G. Jr., and Cardina, J. 1992. Response of eight genetically diverse peanut genotypes to chlorimuron. Peanut Sci. 19:111–115.Google Scholar
11. Krueger, W. A. and Kirksey, K. B. 1993. Postemergence broadleaf signal grass control in corn. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 46:45.Google Scholar
12. Minton, B. W., Shaw, D. R., and Kurtz, M. E. 1989. Postemergence grass and broadleaf herbicide interactions for red rice (Oryza sativa) control in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 3:329–334.Google Scholar
13. Morton, C. A., Harvey, R. G., Kells, J. J., Landis, D. A., Lueschen, W. E., and Fritz, V. A. 1993. In-furrow terbufos reduces field and sweet corn (Zea mays) tolerance to nicosulfuron. Weed Technol. 7:934–939.Google Scholar
14. Norden, A. J., Gorbet, D. W., and Knauft, D. A. 1983. Sunrunner: a runner market-type peanut. Circ. S-303, Agric. Exp. Stn. Univ. of Florida. 8 p.Google Scholar
15. Obrigawitch, T. T., Kenyon, W. H., and Kuratle, H. 1990. Effect of application timing on rhizome johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) control with DPX-V9360. Weed Sci. 38:45–49.Google Scholar
16. Rosales-Robles, E. R. 1993. Postemergence shattercane (Sorghum bicolor) control in corn (Zea mays) in northern Tamaulipas, Mexico. Weed Technol. 7:830–834.Google Scholar
17. Salisbury, C. D. and Bean, B. W. 1993. Johnsongrass control in corn after three years of nicosulfuron, primisulfuron, or DPX-79406 application. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 46:46.Google Scholar
18. Shaw, D. R. and Wesley, M. T. 1993. Interacting effects on absorption and translocation from tank mixtures of ALS-inhibiting and diphenylether herbicides. Weed Technol. 7:693–698.Google Scholar
19. Sorensen, V. M., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1987. The interaction of acifluorfen and bentazon in herbicidal combinations. Weed Sci. 35:449–456.Google Scholar
20. Vidrine, P. R. 1989. Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) control in soybeans (Glycine max) with postemergence herbicides. Weed Technol. 3:455–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Wesley, M. T. and Shaw, D. R. 1992. Interactions of diphenylether herbicides with chlorimuron and imazaquin. Weed Technol. 6:345–351.Google Scholar
22. Westberg, D. E. and Coble, H. D. 1990. Field confirmation of the antagonism between chlorimuron and acifluorfen. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 43:40.Google Scholar
23. Westberg, D. E. and Coble, H. D. 1992. Effect of acifluorfen on the absorption, translocation, and metabolism of chlorimuron in certain weeds. Weed Technol. 6:4–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Wilcut, J. W., Wehtje, G. R., Patterson, M. G., Cole, T. A., and Hicks, T. V. 1989. Absorption, translocation and metabolism of foliar-applied chlorimuron in soybeans (Glycine max), peanuts (Arachis hypogaea), and selected weeds. Weed Sci. 37:175–180.Google Scholar