Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T06:53:57.545Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Glyphosate-Resistant Giant Ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) Control in Glufosinate-Resistant Soybean

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Simranpreet Kaur ,
Lowell D. Sandell ,
John L. Lindquist  and
Amit J. Jhala
Simranpreet Kaur
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583-0915
Lowell D. Sandell
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583-0915
John L. Lindquist
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583-0915
Amit J. Jhala*
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583-0915
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: amit.jhala@unl.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Glyphosate-resistant giant ragweed is one of the most competitive weeds of agronomic crops in the United States. Early emergence and rapid growth rate makes giant ragweed a competitive weed early in the season and reduces crop yields. Therefore, early spring control of giant ragweed using a preplant herbicide is critical. Glufosinate is an alternative POST herbicide for weed control in glufosinate-resistant soybean. Field experiments were conducted at David City, NE, in 2012 and 2013 to evaluate the efficacy of preplant herbicides followed by glufosinate applied alone or in tank mixes for control of glyphosate-resistant giant ragweed in glufosinate-resistant soybean. Preplant treatments containing 2,4-D, flumioxazin, glufosinate, paraquat, saflufenacil, and sulfentrazone provided 79 to 99% control of giant ragweed 21 d after treatment (DAT), and subsequent application of glufosinate alone or in tank mixes resulted in 90 to 99% control at 21 DAT. Preplant application of S-metolachlor plus metribuzin or chlorimuron, flumioxazin plus thifensulfuron followed by glufosinate resulted in < 40% control of giant ragweed, and soybean yields were < 870 kg ha−1. Although statistically comparable to several other treatments, preplant application of 2,4-D or saflufenacil tank mixes followed by glufosinate resulted in the highest level of control (> 97%) and soybean yield (2,624 to 3,378 kg ha−1). This study confirms that preplant herbicide options are available for control of glyphosate-resistant giant ragweed, and a follow-up application of glufosinate will provide season-long control in glufosinate-resistant soybean.

Ambrosia trifida resistente a glyphosate es una de las malezas más competitivas en cultivos agronómicos en Estados Unidos. Su emergencia temprana y tasa rápida de crecimiento hacen A. trifida una maleza competitiva temprano durante la temporada de crecimiento, y que reduce el rendimiento de los cultivos. De esta forma, el control de A. trifida, temprano en la primavera, usando herbicidas pre-siembra es crítico. Glufosinate es un herbicida POST alternativo para el control de malezas en soya resistente a glufosinate. Se realizaron experimentos de campo en David City, Nebraska, en 2012 y 2013 para evaluar la eficacia de herbicidas pre-siembra seguidos de glufosinate aplicado solo o en mezclas en tanque para el control de A. trifida resistente a glyphosate, en soya resistente a glufosinate. Los tratamientos pre-siembra con 2,4-D, flumioxazin, glufosinate, paraquat, saflufenacil, y sulfentrazone brindaron 79 a 99% de control de A. trifida 21 d después del tratamiento (DAT), y la subsecuente aplicación de glufosinate solo o en mezclas en tanque resultaron en 90 a 99% de control a 21 DAT. La aplicación pre-siembra de S-metolachlor más metribuzin o chlorimuron, flumioxazin más thifensulfuron seguidos de glufosinate resultaron en <40% de control de A. trifida, y los rendimientos de la soya fueron <870 kg ha−1. Aunque fue estadísticamente comparable a otros tratamientos, la aplicación pre-siembra de mezclas en tanque de 2,4-D o saflufenacil seguidas de glufosinate resultaron en el mayor nivel de control (>97%) y el mayor rendimiento de la soya (2,624 a 3,378 kg ha−1). Este estudio confirma que hay opciones de herbicidas pre-siembra disponibles para el control de A. trifida resistente a glyphosate, y que aplicaciones posteriores de glufosinate brindarán control a lo largo de toda la temporada de crecimiento en soya resistente a glufosinate.

Keywords

2,4-D amineacetochlorchlorimuroncloransulamdimethenamid-Pflumioxazin, fomesafenglufosinateglyphosateimazethapyrlactofenmetribuzinparaquat, S-metolachlorsaflufenacilsulfentrazonethifensulfuron-methylgiant ragweed, Ambrosia trifida L.soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr.POST herbicidespreplant herbicidesweed controlweed resistance management
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 28 , Issue 4 , December 2014 , pp. 569 - 577
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Avila-Garcia, WV, Sanchez-Olguin, E, Hulting, AG, Mallory-Smith, C (2012) Target-site mutation associated with glufosinate resistance in Italian rygrass (Lolium perenne L. ssp. multiflorum). Pest Manag Sci 68:1248–1254 Google Scholar
Barnett, KA, Culpepper, AS, York, AC, Steckel, LE (2013a) Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) control by glufosinate plus fluometuron applied postemergence to WideStrike® cotton. Weed Technol 27:291–297 Google Scholar
Barnett, KA, Mueller, TC, Steckel, LE (2013b) Glyphosate-resistant giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) control with glufosinate or fomesafen combined with growth regulator herbicides. Weed Technol 27:454–458 Google Scholar
Bassett, IJ, Crompton, CW (1982) The biology of Canadian weeds. 55. Ambrosia trifida L. Can J Plant Sci 62:1003–1010 Google Scholar
Bazzaz, FA, Carlson, RW (1979) Photosynthesis contribution of flowers and seeds to reproductive effort of an annual colonizer. New Phytol 82:223–232 Google Scholar
Beyers, JT, Smeda, RJ, Johnson, WG (2002) Weed management programs in glufosinate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol 16:267–273 Google Scholar
Bryson, CT, DeFelice, MS (2009) Weeds of the South. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press. 480 pGoogle Scholar
Chahal, GS, Johnson, WG (2012) Influence of glyphosate or glufosinate combinations with growth regulator herbicides and other agrochemicals in controlling glyphosate-resistant weeds. Weed Technol 26:638–643 Google Scholar
Coetzer, E, Al-Khatib, A, Peterson, DE (2002) Glufosinate efficacy on Amaranthus species in glufosinate-resistant soybean. Weed Technol 16:326–331 Google Scholar
Craigmyle, BD, Ellis, JM, Bradley, KW (2013a) Influence of weed height and glufosinate plus 2, 4-D combinations on weed control in soybean with resistance to 2, 4–D. Weed Technol 27:271–280 Google Scholar
Craigmyle, BD, Ellis, JM, Bradley, KW (2013b) Influence of herbicide program on weed management in soybean with resistance to glufosinate and 2, 4-D. Weed Technol 27:78–84 Google Scholar
Eubank, TW, Poston, DH, Nandula, VJ, Koger, CH, Shaw, DR, Reynolds, DB (2008) Glyphosate-resistant horseweed control using glyphosate-, paraquat, and glufosinate-based herbicide programs. Weed Technol 22:16–21 Google Scholar
Ferrell, JA, Witt, WW (2002) Comparison of glyphosate with other herbicides for weed control in corn (Zea mays): efficacy and economics. Weed Technol 16:701–706 Google Scholar
Givens, WA, Shaw, DR, Kruger, GR, Young, BG, Wilson, RG, Wilcut, JW, Jordan, DL, Weller, SC (2009) Survey of tillage trends following the adoption of glyphosate-resistant crops. Weed Technol 23:162–166 Google Scholar
Harrison, SK, Regnier, EE, Schmoll, JT, Webb, JE (2001) Competition and fecundity of giant ragweed in corn. Weed Sci 49:224–229 Google Scholar
Heap IM (2014a) International survey of herbicide resistant weeds: Weeds resistant to EPSP synthase inhibitors. (G/9) http://www.weedscience.org/summary/MOA.aspx?MOAID=12 Accessed: April 10, 2014Google Scholar
Heap IM (2014b) International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds: Herbicide Resistant Giant Ragweed Globally. http://www.weedscience.org/summary/Species.aspx Accessed April 10, 2014Google Scholar
Johnson, B, Loux, MM, Nordby, D, Sprague, C, Nice, G, Westhoven, A, Stachler, J (2006) Biology and Management of Giant Ragweed. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue Extension Publication GWC-12Google Scholar
Jordan, TN (1985) Weed survey of the north central weed control conference. Pages 344–455 in Proceedings of the 42nd North Central Weed Control Conference. Las Cruces, NM North Central Weed Science Society Google Scholar
Loux, MM, Berry, MA (1991) Use of a grower survey for estimating weed problems. Weed Technol 5:460–466 Google Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Jha, P, Steckel, LE, Scott, RC (2010) Confirmation and control of glyphosate-resistant giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) in Tennessee. Weed Technol 24:64–70 Google Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Riar, D, Jha, P, Scott, RC (2011) Confirmation, control, and physiology of glyphosate-resistant giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) in Arkansas. Weed Technol 25:430–435 Google Scholar
Owen, LN, Mueller, TC, Main, CL, Bond, J, Steckel, LE (2011) Evaluating rates and application timings of saflufenacil for control of glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis) prior to planting no-till cotton. Weed Technol 25:1–5 Google Scholar
Owen, MDK, Zelaya, IA (2005) Herbicide-resistance crops and weed resistance to herbicides. Pest Manag Sci 61:301–311 Google Scholar
Patzoldt, WL, Tranel, PJ (2002) Molecular analysis of cloransulam resistance in a population of giant ragweed. Weed Sci 50:299–305 Google Scholar
Powles, SB, Yu, Q (2010) Evolution in action: plants resistant to herbicides. Anu Rev Plant Biol 61:317–347 Google Scholar
Riley, EB (2013) Evaluation of Herbicide Programs for the Management of Glyphosate- Resistant Giant Ragweed in Soybean. M.S. dissertation. Columbia, MO: University of Missouri. 71 pGoogle Scholar
Riley, EB, Bradley, KW (2014) Influence of application timing and glyphosate tank mix combinations on the survival of glyphosate-resistant giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) in soybean. Weed Technol 28:1–9 Google Scholar
Riley, EB, Raymond, EM, Bradley, KW (2014) Influence of herbicide programs on glyphosate-resistant giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida L.) density, soybean yield, and net economic return in glyphosate- and glufosinate-resistant soybean. Crop Manag 13: DOI: Google Scholar
Robinson, AP, Simpson, DM, Johnson, WG (2012) Summer annual weed control with 2,4-D and glyphosate. Weed Technol 26:657–660 Google Scholar
Saari, LL, Cotterman, JC, Thill, DC (1994) Resistance to acetolactate synthase inhibiting herbicides. Pages 83–140 in Powles, SB, Holtum, JAM, eds. Herbicide Resistance in Plants: Biology and Biochemistry. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers Google Scholar
Schultz, ME, Schmitzer, PR, Alexander, AL, Dorich, RA (2000) Identification and management of resistance to ALS inhibiting herbicides in giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) and common ragweed (Ambrosia artemissifolia). Weed Sci Soc Am. Abstr 40:42 [Abstract]Google Scholar
Taylor, JB, Loux, MM, Harrison, SK, Regnier, E (2002) Response of ALS-resistant common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) and giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) to ALS-inhibiting and alternative herbicides. Weed Technol 16:815–825 Google Scholar
Webster, TM, Loux, MM, Regnier, EE, Harrison, SK (1994) Giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) canopy architecture and interference studies in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol 8:559–564 Google Scholar
Wiesbrook, ML, Johnson, WG, Hart, SE, Bradley, PR, Wax, LM (2001) Comparison of weed management systems in narrow-row, glyphosate- and glufosinate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol 15:122–128 Google Scholar
Young, BG (2006) Changes in herbicide use patterns and production practices resulting from glyphosate-resistant crops. Weed Technol 20:301–307 Google Scholar