Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T14:43:24.162Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Grain Rye Residues and Weed Control Strategies in Reduced Tillage Potatoes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Luis E. Lanfranconi ,
Robin R. Bellinder  and
Russell W. Wallace
Luis E. Lanfranconi
Affiliation:
Dep. Fruit and Veg. Sci., Plant Sci. Bldg., Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY 14853-0327
Robin R. Bellinder
Affiliation:
Dep. Fruit and Veg. Sci., Plant Sci. Bldg., Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY 14853-0327
Russell W. Wallace
Affiliation:
Dep. Fruit and Veg. Sci., Plant Sci. Bldg., Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY 14853-0327
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Experiments were conducted to evaluate the effect of tillage, rye residue levels, and control strategies on weed suppression and potato yield. Reduced tillage (RT) yields in 1989 were lower than in conventional tillage (CT) due to high hairy galinsoga populations. However, in 1990, potato yields were greater in RT when early emerging weeds were suppressed. Increasing residue levels up to 2300 kg ha−1 had no effect on weeds or yields in either year. In a separate study, preemergence herbicides (linuron plus metolachlor, 1.7 kg ai ha−1 each) applied 10 d after planting (DAP) in reduced tillage controlled weeds for 6 wk, but efficacy decreased after hilling. Metribuzin applied postemergence (0.19 kg ai ha−1) 7 d after hilling controlled late germinating weeds. Potato yields were greatest when the preemergence herbicides were applied.

Keywords

Linuron, N′-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-N-methoxy-N-methylureametolachlor, 2-chloro-N-(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)-N-(2-methoxy-1-methylethyl)acetamidemetribuzin, 4-amino-6-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-3-(methylthio)-1,2,4-triazin-5(4H)-onepotato, Solarium tuberosum L. ‘Norchip’rye, Secale cereale L.hairy galinsoga, Galinsoga ciliata (Raf.) Blake # GASCIMulch residueslow-rate herbicidesminimum tillagelinuronmetolachlormetribuzinGalinsoga ciliataSecale cerealeSolarium tuberosumGASCI
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , March 1993 , pp. 23 - 28
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Barnes, J. P. and Putnam, A. R. 1983. Rye residues contribute to weed suppression in no-tillage cropping systems. J. Chem. Ecol. 9: 1045–1057.Google Scholar
2. Bellinder, R. R. and Wallace, R. W. 1991. An integrated production approach to weed control in potatoes. p. 623 in Pimentel, D., ed., CRC Handbook of Pest Management in Agriculture, 2nd ed. CRC Press, Boca Raton, PL.Google Scholar
3. Baskin, J. M. and Baskin, C. C. 1978. A discussion on the growth and competitive ability of C3 and C4 plants. Castanea 43:71–76.Google Scholar
4. Caldiz, D. O. and Panelo, M. 1985. Effectos de la competencia de malezas de hoja ancha y angosta sobre el crecimiento y el rendimiento de tuberculos en papa. Revista de la Facultad de Agronomia. Tomos LXI y LXII. Entrega 1–2.Google Scholar
5. Crutchfield, D. A., Wicks, G. A., and Burnside, O. C. 1985. Effect of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) straw mulch on weed control. Weed Sci 34: 110–114.Google Scholar
6. Dallyn, S. L. and Fricke, D. H. 1974. The use of minimum tillage plus herbicides in potato production. Am. Potato J. 51:177–184.Google Scholar
7. De Almeida, F. S. 1985. Effect of some winter mulches on the soil weed infestation. Proc. Br. Crop Prot. Conf.—Weeds 2:651–659.Google Scholar
8. Kain, D. P., Scieczka, J. P., and Sweet, R. D. 1986. Field evaluation of a proposed integrated pest management (IPM) approach to weed control in potatoes. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 40:187–193.Google Scholar
9. Lodhi, M.A.K., Blal, R., and Malik, K. A. 1987. Allelopathy in agroecosystems: Wheat phytotoxicity and its possible roles in crop rotation. J. Chem. Ecol. 13:1881–1891.Google Scholar
10. Nelson, D. C. and Giles, J. F. 1989. Weed management in two potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) cultivars using tillage and pendimethalin. Weed Sci. 37:228–232.Google Scholar
11. Nelson, D. C. and Thoreson, M. C. 1981. Competition between potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L.) and weeds. Weed Sci. 29:672–677.Google Scholar
12. Rioux, R., Comeau, J. E., and Genereux, H. 1979. Effect of cultural practices and herbicides on weed population and competition in potatoes. Can. J. Plant Sci. 59:367–374.Google Scholar
13. Percy, R. W., Tumosa, N., and Williams, K. 1981. Relationships between growth, photosynthesis and competitive interactions for a C3 and a C4 plant. Oecologia 48:371–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Putnam, A. R., Defrank, J., and Barnes, J. P. 1983. Exploitation of allelopathy for weed control in annual and perennial cropping systems. J. Chem. Ecol. 9:1001–1010.Google Scholar
15. Putnam, A. R. 1990. Vegetable weed control with minimal herbicide inputs. Proc. Sustainable Commercial Vegetable Production with Minimal Use of Synthetic Fertilizers and Pesticides. HortScience 25: 153–171.Google Scholar
16. Scott, T. W., Pleasant, J. Mt., Burt, R. F., and Otis, D. J. 1979. Contributions of groundcover, dry matter, and nitrogen from intercrops and cover crops in a corn polyculture system. Agron. J. 79:792–798.Google Scholar
17. Shilling, D. G., Liebl, R. A., and Worsham, A. D. 1984. Rye (Secale cereale L.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) mulch: The suppression of certain broadleaf weeds and the isolation and identification of phytotoxins. p. 243–271 in Thompson, A. C., ed., The Chemistry of Allelopathy: Biochemical Interactions Among Plants. Am. Chem. Soc. Symp. Ser. 268, Am. Chem. Soc., Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
18. Sieczka, J. B. and Creighton, J. F. 1984. Weed control of potatoes on Long Island. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 39:176–180.Google Scholar
19. Somody, C. N., Michieka, R. W., Ilnicki, R. D., and Somody, J. 1978. Weed control in white potatoes with pendimethalin and metribuzin applied prior to and after drag-off. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 32: 177–179.Google Scholar
20. Sweet, R. D. 1986. Life History Studies as Related to Weed Control in the Northeast. 9. Galinsoga. Northeast Reg. Publ., Cornell Univ. p. 16–24.Google Scholar
21. Van Gessel, M. and Renner, K. A. 1990. Redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus) and barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) interference in potatoes (Solanum tuberosum). Weed Sci. 38:338–343.Google Scholar
22. Wall, D. A. and Friesen, G. H. 1990. Effect of duration of green foxtail (Setaria viridis) competition on potato (Solanum tuberosum) yield. Weed Technol. 4:539–542.Google Scholar
23. Wallace, R. W. and Bellinder, R. R. 1989. Potato (Solanum tuberosum) yields and weed populations in conventional and reduced tillage systems. Weed Technol. 3:590–595.Google Scholar
24. Wallace, R. W. and Bellinder, R. R. 1990. Low-rate applications of herbicides in conventional and reduced tillage potatoes (Solanum tuberosum). Weed Technol. 4:509–513.Google Scholar