Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-l4ctd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-22T08:06:04.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Herbicides for Weed Control in Blessed Thistle (Silybum Marianum)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Valtcho D. Zheljazkov*
Affiliation:
Mississippi State University, North Mississippi Research & Ext. Center, 5421 Hwy. 145 South, Verona, MS 38879
Ivan Zhalnov
Affiliation:
Department of Farming, University of Agriculture, 12 Mendeleev str., 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria
Nedko K. Nedkov
Affiliation:
Research Institute for Roses and Medicinal Plants, 49 Osvobojdenia Blv, 6100, Kazanlak, Bulgaria
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: vj40@pss.msstate.edu.

Abstract

Blessed thistle is an important medicinal crop in Europe and recently has become more significant in North America. A limiting factor in blessed thistle production is weed interference. Field experiments were conducted near Plovdiv, Bulgaria, to study the effect of selected herbicides on weed control, crop productivity, and crop quality. Seed yields of blessed thistle were increased with metribuzin alone at 0.5 kg ai/ha, pendimethalin alone 1.32 kg ai/ha, pendimethalin at 1.32 kg ai/ha plus metribuzin at 0.5 kg ai/ha, trifluralin at 0.84 kg ai/ha plus linuron at 1.0 kg ai/ha, and in the hand-weeded control compared to the nonweeded control (nontreated check). Pendimethalin and metribuzin were safe both alone and in combination for weed control in blessed thistle. Bentazon at 0.96 kg ai/ha inhibited blessed thistle development and reduced seed yields compared to the untreated check. Generally, weed control increased the content of silymarin and decreased the amount of seed oil. Overall, seeds contained 0.26 to 0.36% taxifolin, 0.69 to 0.99% silydianin plus silycristin, 1.31 to 1.78% silybin, and 0.27 to 0.39 % isosilybin.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Boerth, J. and Strong, K. M. 2002. The clinical utility of blessed thistle (Silybum marianum) in cirrhosis of the liver. J. Herb. Pharmacotherapy 2:1117.Google Scholar
Cacso, L., Feldesi, D., and Stieber, G. 1977. Chemical control experiments in lady's thistle (Silybum marianum L. (Gaertn.). Herba Hung. 16:4557.Google Scholar
Chiavari, G., Galletti, G. C., Marotti, M., and Piccaglia, R. 1991. Silymarin content of different Silybum marianum L. Gaertn cultivars. Herba Hung. 30:2324.Google Scholar
Cosio, E. G., Weissenbock, G., and McClure, J. W. 1985. Acifluorfen-induced isoflavonoids and enzymes of their biosynthesis in mature soybean leaves. Plant Physiol. 78:1419.Google Scholar
FAO-UNESCO 1974. Soil map of the world. M=1:500000. Volume I. Paris Legened-UNESCO.Google Scholar
Fetvadjieva, N., Straka, F., and Mihaylova, P. 1994. Pesticide manual. Sofia, Bulgaria Sofia PSSA-Publishiset-Agri.Google Scholar
Foldesi, D. and Barsi, E. 1983. Seeding date and spacing experiments with Silybum marianum (L). Gaertn. Herba Hung. 22:5564.Google Scholar
Hamid, S., Sabir, A. W., Khan, S. A., and Aziz, P. 1983. Experimental cultivation of Silybum marianum and chemical composition of its oil. Pak. J. Sci. Ind. Res. 26:244246.Google Scholar
He, Q. R., Osuchowski, M. F., Johnson, V. J., and Sharma, R. P. 2002. Physiological responses to a natural antioxidant flavonoid mixture, silymarin, in BALB/c mice: I. Induction of transforming growth factor beta1 and c-myc in liver with marginal effects on other genes. Planta Med. 68:676679.Google Scholar
Hecht, H., Mohr, T., and Lembrecht, S. 1992. Harvesting medicinal grains by combine. Landtechnik 47:494496.Google Scholar
Jacobs, B. P., Dennehy, C., Ramirez, G., Sapp, J., and Lawrence, V. A. 2002. Blessed thistle for the treatment of liver disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am. J. Med. 113:506515.Google Scholar
Kohno, H., Tanaka, T., Kawabata, K., Hirose, Y., Sugie, S., Tsuda, H., and Mori, H. 2002. Silymarin, a naturally occurring polyphenolic antioxidant flavonoid, inhibits azoxymethane-induced colon carcinogenesis in male F344 rats. Int. J. Cancer. 101:461468.Google Scholar
Koinov, V. 1968. Soils map of Bulgaria. 1:400000. Sofia Zemizdat.Google Scholar
Kömives, T. and Casida, J. E. 1996. Acifluorfen increases the leaf content of phytoalexins and stress metabolites in several crops. J. Agric. Food Chem. 31:751755.Google Scholar
Lydon, J. and Duke, S. O. 1989. Pesticide effects on secondary metabolism of higher plants. Pestic. Sci. 25:361374.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R. B. and Abernethy, R. J. 1993. Tolerance of clary sage, coriander, and caraway to herbicides applied pre- and post-emergence 2429. Proceedings of the Forty-Sixth New Zealand Plant Protection Conference, Christchurch, New Zealand, 10–12 August 1993. Palmerston North, New Zealand: The New Zealand Plant Protection Societies.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nassuato, G., Iemmolo, R. M., and Strazzabosco, M. et al. 1991. Effect of silybin on biliary lipid composition: experimental and clinical study. J. Hepatol. 12:290295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Omer, E. A., Refaat, A. M., Ahmed, S. S., Kamel, A., and Hammouda, F. M. 1993. Effect of spacing and fertilization on the yield and active constituents of blessed thistle, Silybum marianum . J. Herbs, Spices & Med. Plants 1:1723.Google Scholar
Plant Protection and Quarantine 2002. Federal Noxious Weed List. USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service: Web page: http://plants.usda.gov/cgi_bin/federal_noxious.cgi. Accessed September 1, 2006.Google Scholar
Potkanski, A., Nowak, W., and Kujawa, A. 1991. Using endosperm of blessed thistle (Silybum marianum L.) and maize cake by-product for feeding calves in the finishing period. Rocz. Akad. Roln. Poznaniu Zootechnika 229:8593.Google Scholar
SAS Institute 2000. The SAS system for windows version 8. Cary, NC SAS Institute.Google Scholar
Schunke, U. 1992. Holy thistle. First experiences with cultivation and harvest. Landtechnik 47:548550.Google Scholar
Todorov, M., Kunev, K. G., and Roilev, D. 1990. Study of machine harvesting of blessed thistle. Selskostop. Tekhn. 27:3944.Google Scholar
Topalov, V., Dechev, I., and Pehlivanov, M. 1983. Crop production of blessed thistle. in Topalov, V.D., Dechev, I., Pehlivanov, M., eds. Crop Production. Sofia Zemizdat Press. 421424.Google Scholar
[USDA-ARS] Agricultural Research Service 2005. Noxious weeds in the US and Canada. Web page: http://invader.dbs.umt.edu/noxious_weeds/. Accessed: November 2005.Google Scholar
Wallace, S. N., Carrier, D. J., and Clausen, E. C. 2005. Batch solvent extraction of flavonolignans from milk thistle (Silybum marianum L. Gaertner). Phytochem. Analysis 16:716.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zheljazkov, V. and Zhalnov, I. 1995. Effect of herbicides on yields and quality of Coriandrum sativum L. production. J. Ess. Oil Res. 7:633639.Google Scholar
Zheljazkov, V. D., Yankuloff, Y., Raev, R., Stanev, S., Margina, A., and Kovatcheva, N. 1996. Achievements in breeding on medicinal and aromatic plants in Bulgaria. in Pank, F., eds. Proceedings of the International Symposium: Breeding Research in Aromatic and Medicinal Plants. Quedlinburg, Germany. 142145.Google Scholar