Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T21:08:27.341Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of Application Variables on Efficacy of Postemergence Applications of DPX-PE350

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

David L. Jordan ,
Robert E. Frans  and
Marilyn R. McClelland
David L. Jordan
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Ark., Fayetteville, AR 72703
Robert E. Frans
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Ark., Fayetteville, AR 72703
Marilyn R. McClelland
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Ark., Fayetteville, AR 72703
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Experiments were conducted to compare control of entireleaf morningglory with POST applications of DPX-PE350 applied with no adjuvant, a nonionic surfactant, or crop oil concentrate in spray volumes of 94, 235, and 375 L ha−1. Control was greater with a nonionic surfactant or crop oil concentrate than with no adjuvant and control with crop oil concentrate exceeded control with the nonionic surfactant. Spray volume had no effect on efficacy. DPX-PE350 was more effective when applied to foliage only or to soil plus foliage than when applied to soil only after emergence of entireleaf morningglory. Control from soil-only applications was lower on a silty clay soil than on a silt loam soil. Except for sicklepod, mixing DPX-PE350 with fluometuron or MSMA had little effect on weed control.

Keywords

DPX-PE350, sodium 2-chloro-(4,5-dimethoxypyrimidin-2-ylthio)benzoatefluometuron, N,N-dimethyl-N′-[3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]ureaMSMA, monosodium salt of methylarsonic acidentireleaf morningglory, Ipomoea hederacea var. integriuscula Gray # IPOHGsicklepod, Cassia obtusifolia L. # CASOBAdjuvantsherbicide interactionssite of absorptionspray volumefluometuronMSMACassia obtusifoliaIpomoea hederacea var. integriusculaCASOBIPOHG
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , September 1993 , pp. 619 - 624
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Ambach, R. M. and Ashford, R. 1982. Effects of variations in drop makeup on phytotoxicity of glyphosate. Weed Sci. 30:221–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Bryson, C. T. 1993. Effects of rainfall on DPX-PE350 applied to selected broadleaf weeds. Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. 33:261.Google Scholar
3. Buhler, D. D. and Burnside, O. C. 1983. Effect of spray components on glyphosate toxicity to annual grasses. Weed Sci. 31:124–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Buhler, D. D. and Burnside, O. C. 1984. Effect of application factors on postemergence phytotoxicity of fluazifop-butyl, haloxyfop-methyl, and sethoxydim. Weed Sci. 32:574–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Crowder, S. H., Mitchell, W. H., and Williams, C. S. 1992. DPX-PE350: A new cotton herbicide. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 45:343.Google Scholar
6. Edmund, R. M. Jr. and York, A. C. 1987. Effects of rainfall and temperature on postemergence control of sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) with imazaquin and DPX-F6025. Weed Sci. 35:231–236.Google Scholar
7. Edmund, R. M. Jr. and York, A. C. 1987. Factors associated with postemergence control of sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) with imazaquin and DPX-F6025: Spray volume, growth stage, and soil-applied vernolate. Weed Sci. 35:216–223.Google Scholar
8. Frans, R. E., Morris, G., and Applebeny, M. 1971. Effect of topical herbicide applications on growth and yield of cotton. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 24:92.Google Scholar
9. Guthrie, D. S. and York, A. C. 1989. Cotton development and yield following fluometuron postemergence applied. Weed Technol. 3:501–504.Google Scholar
10. Hatzios, K. K. and Penner, D. 1985. Interactions of herbicides and other agrochemicals in higher plants. Rev. Weed Sci. 1:1–63.Google Scholar
11. Hogue, C. W. 1974. Response of cotton and weeds to herbicides with phytobland oil or surfactant. Weed Sci. 22:97–101.Google Scholar
12. Holly, K. 1964. Selectivity in relation to formulation and application methods. p. 249–277 in Audus, L. J., ed. Herbicides, Physiology, Biochemistry, Ecology. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
13. Holshouser, D. L. and Chandler, J. M. 1991. Susceptibility of eight morningglory species to DPX-PE350. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 44:78.Google Scholar
14. Jordan, D. L., Frans, R. E., and McClelland, M. R. 1990. Evaluation of KIH-8921 for weed management systems in cotton. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 43:114.Google Scholar
15. Jordan, D. L., Frans, R. E., and McClelland, M. R. 1992. MSMA effect on postemergence directed cotton herbicides. Arkansas Farm Res. 41(6):6–7.Google Scholar
16. Jordan, D. L., Frans, R. E., and McClelland, M. R. 1993. Influence of application rate and timing on efficacy of DPX-PE350 applied postemergence. Weed Technol. 7:216–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Jordan, T. N. 1977. Effects of diluent volume and surfactant on the phytotoxicity of glyphosate to bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon). Weed Sci. 25:448–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Lassiter, R. B. Jr. and Coble, H. D. 1987. Carrier volume effects on antagonism of sethoxydim and bentazon. Weed Sci. 35:541–546.Google Scholar
19. Lee, S. D. and Oliver, L. R. 1982. Efficacy of acifluorfen on broadleaf weeds. Times and methods for application. Weed Sci. 30:520–526.Google Scholar
20. McKinley, K. S., Ashford, R., and Ford, R. J. 1974. Effects of droplet size, spray volume, and dosage on paraquat toxicity. Weed Sci. 22:31–34.Google Scholar
21. McKinley, K. S., Brandt, S. A., Morse, P., and Ashford, R. 1972. Droplet size on phytotoxicity of herbicides. Weed Sci. 20:450–452.Google Scholar
22. Nalewaja, J. D. and Adamczewski, K. M. 1977. Redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus) control with bentazon plus adjuvants. Weed Sci. 25:506–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Penner, D. 1989. The impact of adjuvants on herbicide antagonism. Weed Technol. 3:227–231.Google Scholar
24. Penner, D., Roggenbuck, F. C., and VanFleteren, K. 1984. Evaluation of soybean oil concentrates as a substitute for petroleum oil based crop oil concentrate. p. 26–29 in Proc. Agric. Chem. Uses of Soybean Oil Workshop. Am. Soybean Assoc. St. Louis, MO.Google Scholar
25. Varshney, J. G. and Singh, H. G. 1990. Effect of adjuvants on herbicide efficacy in controlling weeds in wheat. Weed Sci. 38:229–236.Google Scholar
26. Wixson, M. T. and Shaw, D. R. 1992. Effect of adjuvants on weed control and soybean (Glycine max) tolerance with AC 263,222. Weed Technol. 5:817–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27. Wells, R. G., Guy, C. B., and Beaty, J. W. 1991. Cotton response to DPX-PE350, fluometuron, and MSMA. Abstr. Arkansas Agric. Pestic. Assoc. 30:23.Google Scholar