Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T14:29:54.440Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interactions of DPX-PE350 with Fluazifop-P, Sethoxydim, Clethodim, and Quizalofop-P

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

David L. Jordan ,
Robert E. Frans  and
Marilyn R. McClelland
David L. Jordan
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72703
Robert E. Frans
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72703
Marilyn R. McClelland
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72703
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Interactions of fluazifop-P, sethoxydim, clethodim, and quizalofop-P with DPX-PE350 were evaluated. DPX-PE350 at 110 g ae ha−1 reduced control of large crabgrass when mixed with all graminicides and control of broadleaf signalgrass when mixed with fluazifop-P or quizalofop-P. Increasing the rate of graminicide reduced or eliminated antagonism. Applying sethoxydim and DPX-PE350 sequentially eliminated antagonism on large crabgrass. Control of seedling johnsongrass by the graminicides was not reduced by DPX-PE350. DPX-PE350 reduced control of rhizomatous johnsongrass by sethoxydim. Graminicides had no effect on entireleaf morningglory control with DPX-PE350.

Keywords

Clethodim, (E,E)-(+)-2-[1-[[(3-chloro-2-propenyl)oxy]-imino]propyl]-5-[2-(ethylthio)propyl]-3-hydroxy-2-cyclohexen-1-oneDPX-PE350, sodium 2-chloro-6-(4,5-dimethoxypyrimidin-2-ylthio)benzoatefluazifop-P, (R)-2-[4-[[5-(trifluoromethyl)-2-pyridinyl]oxy]phenoxy]propanoic acidquizalofop-P, (R)-2-[4[(6-chloro-2-quinoxalinyl)oxy]phenoxy]propanoic acidsethoxydim, 2-[1-(ethoxyimino)butyl]-5-[2-(ethylthio)propyl]-3-hydroxy-2-cyclohexen-1-onebroadleaf signalgrass, Brachiaria platyphylla (Griseb.) Nash # BRAPPentireleaf morningglory Ipomoea hederacea var. integriuscula Gray # IPOHGjohnsongrass, Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers. # SORHAlarge crabgrass, Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop. # DIGSAAntagonismgraminicidesherbicide interactionBrachiaria platyphyllaDigitaria sanguinalisIpomoea hederaceavar. integriusculaSorghum halepenseBRAPPDIGSAIPOHGSORHA
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , September 1993 , pp. 605 - 610
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bryson, T. C., Snipes, C. E., and Shaw, D. R. 1991. Effects of DPX-PE350 on weed control and cotton growth and yield. p. 957 in Herber, D. J. and Richter, D. A., eds. Proc. Beltwide Cotton Prod. Res. Conf., San Antonio, TX. Jan. 8-13, 1991. Natl. Cotton Counc. Am., Memphis, TN.Google Scholar
2. Byrd, J. D. Jr. and York, A. C. 1987. Interactions of fluometuron and MSMA with fluazifop and sethoxydim. Weed Sci. 35:270–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Crawford, S. H., Vidrine, P. R., and Collins, R. K. 1989. Preliminary evaluation of DPX-T9595 and KIH-8921 for weed control in cotton. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 42:106.Google Scholar
4. Ferriera, K. L. and Coble, H. D. 1992. Potential interactions with DPX-PE350 in cotton. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 45:48.Google Scholar
5. Frans, R. E., Morris, G., and Appleberry, M. 1971. Effect of topical herbicide applications on growth and yield of cotton. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 24:92.Google Scholar
6. Hahn, K. L. and Coble, H. D. 1988. The interaction between chlorimuron and quizalofop among several grass species. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 41:360.Google Scholar
7. Hahn, K. L. and Coble, H. D. 1989. Characterization of the antagonistic interaction between quizalofop and chlorimuron. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 42:276.Google Scholar
8. Henniger, C. G., Keeling, J. W., and Abernathy, J. R. 1990. Evaluation of KIH-8921 in cotton on the Texas southern high plains. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 43:106.Google Scholar
9. Holshouser, D. L. and Coble, H. D. 1990. Compatibility of sethoxydim with five postemergence broadleaf herbicides. Weed Technol. 4:128–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Jordan, D. L., Frans, R. E., and McClelland, M. R. 1993. Total postemergence herbicide programs in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) with sethoxydim and DPX-PE350. Weed Technol. 7:196–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Jordan, D. L., Frans, R. E., and McClelland, M. R. 1993. Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) response to DPX-PE350 applied postemergence. Weed Technol. 7:159–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Jordan, D. L. and York, A. C. 1989. Effects of ammonium fertilizers and BCH-81508 S on antagonism with sethoxydim plus bentazon mixtures. Weed Technol. 3:450–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Kollmer, C. W. and Coble, H. D. 1988. Mechanism of the antagonistic interaction between fluazifop-P and imazaquin. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 41:305.Google Scholar
14. Mitchell, W. H. 1991. Cotton weed control with DPX-PE350 “A southern perspective”. p. 958 in Herber, D. J. and Richter, D. J., eds. Proc. Beltwide Cotton Prod. Res. Conf. Nashville, TN Jan. 6-10, 1992. Natl. Cotton Counc. Am., Memphis, TN.Google Scholar
15. Myers, P. F. and Coble, H. D. 1992. Antagonism of graminicide activity on annual grass species by imazethapyr. Weed Technol. 6:333–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Rhodes, G. N. Jr. and Coble, H. D. 1984. Influence of application variables on antagonism between sethoxydim and bentazon. Weed Sci. 32:436–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Vidrine, P. R., Crawford, S. H., and Girlinghouse, J. M. 1993. DPX-PE350 interaction in cotton. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 46:(in press).Google Scholar
18. Vidrine, P. R., Crawford, S. H., and Millhollon, L. P. 1990. Weed control and cotton tolerance with KIH-8921. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 43:137.Google Scholar