Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T05:51:53.492Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Population Modeling Approach for Evaluating Leafy Spurge (Euphorbia esula) Development and Control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Bruce D. Maxwell ,
Mark V. Wilson  and
Steven R. Radosevich
Bruce D. Maxwell
Affiliation:
Dep. For. Sci., Oreg. State Univ., Corvallis, OR 97331
Mark V. Wilson
Affiliation:
Dep. Bot Plant Pathol, Oreg. State Univ., Corvallis, OR 97331
Steven R. Radosevich
Affiliation:
Dep. For. Sci., Oreg. State Univ., Corvallis, OR 97331
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Weed population models can serve as a framework to organize weed biology information and to develop weed control strategies. Models help to identify information gaps, to set research priorities, to develop hypotheses pertinent to weed population regulation, and to suggest control strategies. A population simulation model of leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula L. # EPHES) was used to demonstrate the applicability of population models to weed science. Sensitivity analysis of an existing leafy spurge model indicated that transition from basal buds to vegetative shoots, survival of vegetative shoots, and survival of basal buds over winter were important transition parameters influencing population growth of this weed species. Possible mechanisms (intraspecific competition and environmental factors) that influence the transition from basal buds to vegetative shoots were shown. Intraspecific density effects on basal bud transition and production were included to show model refinement and second-generation model development. Four control strategies were simulated and were compared to field studies to show the predictive and management potential of the modeling approach. Simulations of population response to foliage feeding herbivores was highly correlated (r = 0.98) with field data for sheep grazing on leafy spurge. Simulation of picloram (4-amino-3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinecarboxylic acid) applied to leafy spurge also was correlated (r = 0.97) with field results.

Keywords

Weed simulation modelsensitivity analysisEPHES
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , April 1988 , pp. 132 - 138
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Abrahamson, W. G. 1980. Demography and vegetative reproduction. p. 89–106 in Solbrig, O. T., ed. Demography and Evolution in Plant Populations. Univ. Calif. Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
2. Bowes, G. G., and Molberg, F. S. 1975. Picloram for the control of leafy spurge. Can. J. Plant Sci. 55:1023–1027.Google Scholar
3. Bowes, G. G., and Thomas, A. G. 1978. Leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula L.) control based on a population model. Proc. 1st. Int. Rangeland Congr., p. 254–256.Google Scholar
4. Bowes, G. G., and Thomas, A. G. 1978. Longevity of leafy spurge seed in the soil following various control programs. J. Range Manage. 31:137–140.Google Scholar
5. Cousens, R. D. 1986. The use of population models in the study of the economics of weed control. Proc. European Weed Res. Soc. Symp. 1986, Econ. Weed Control, p. 269–276.Google Scholar
6. Dunn, P. H. 1985. Origins of leafy spurge in North America. p. 7–13 in Watson, A. K., ed. Leafy Spurge. Weed Sci. Soc. Am., Champaign, IL.Google Scholar
7. Harper, J. L., and Sagar, G. R. 1953. Some aspects of the ecology of buttercups in permanent grasslands. Proc. Br. Weed Control Conf. 1:256–265.Google Scholar
8. Holler, L. C., and Abrahamson, W. G. 1977. Seed and vegetative reproduction in relation to density in Fragaria virginiana (Rosaceae). Am. J. Bot. 64.1003–1007.Google Scholar
9. Lefkovitch, L. P. 1967. A theoretical evaluation of population growth after removing individuals from some age groups. Bull. Entomol. Res. 57:437–445.Google Scholar
10. Leslie, P. H. 1945. On the use of matrices in certain population mathematics. Biometrika 33:183–213.Google Scholar
11. McIntyre, G. I. 1979. Developmental studies on Euphorbia esula. Evidence of competition for water as a factor in the mechanism of root bud inhibition. Can. J. Bot. 57:2572–2581.Google Scholar
12. Messersmith, C. G. 1983. The leafy spurge plant. N. D. Farm Res. 40(5):3–7.Google Scholar
13. Mortimer, A. M. 1983. On weed demography. p. 3–40 in Fletcher, W. W., ed. Recent Advances in Weed Research. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, England.Google Scholar
14. Mortimer, A. M., McMahon, D. J., Manlove, R. K., and Putwain, P. D. 1980. The prediction of weed infestations and cost of differing control strategies. In Proc. 1980 Br. Crop Prot. Conf.-Weeds 415–423.Google Scholar
15. Nissen, S. J., and Foley, M. E. 1987. Correlative inhibition and dormancy in root buds of leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula). Weed Sci. 35:155–159.Google Scholar
16. Raju, M.V.S. 1975. Experimental studies on leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula L.) I. Ontogeny and distribution of buds and shoots on the hypocotyl. Bot. Gaz. 136:254–261.Google Scholar
17. Raju, M.V.S., and Marchuk, W. N. 1977. Experimental studies on leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula L.) III. Xylem development in relation to the hypocotylary bud growth. Bot. Gaz. 138:264–261.Google Scholar
18. Sagar, G. R., and Mortimer, A. M. 1976. An apprach to the study of the population dynamics of plants with special reference to weeds. Ann. Appl. Biol. 1:1–47.Google Scholar
19. Sarukhan, J., and Gadgil, M. 1974. Studies on plant demography: Ranuculus repens L., R. bulbosus L. and R. acris L. III. A mathematical model incorporating multiple modes of reproduction. J Ecol. 62:921–936.Google Scholar
20. Selleck, G. W., Coupland, R. T., and Frankton, C. 1962. Leafy spurge in Saskatchewan. Ecol. Monogr. 32:1–29.Google Scholar
21. Thomas, A. G., and Dale, H. M. 1975. The role of seed reproduction in the dynamics of established populations of Hieracium floribundum and a comparison with that of vegetative reproduction. Can. J. Bot. 53:3022–3031.Google Scholar
22. Watson, A. K. 1985. Integrated management of leafy spurge. p. 93–104 in Watson, A. K., ed. Leafy Spurge. Weed Sci. Soc. Am., Champaign, IL.Google Scholar
23. Werner, P. A., and Caswell, H. 1977. Population growth rates and age versus stage-distribution models for teasel (Dipsacus sylvestris Huds.). Ecol. 58:1103–1111.Google Scholar