Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T05:51:23.454Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Predicting the Evolution and Dynamics of Herbicide Resistance in Weed Populations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Bruce D. Maxwell
Affiliation:
Dep. For. Sci., Oreg. State Univ., Corvallis, OR 97331
Mary Lynn Roush
Affiliation:
Dep. For. Sci., Oreg. State Univ., Corvallis, OR 97331
Steven R. Radosevich
Affiliation:
Dep. For. Sci., Oreg. State Univ., Corvallis, OR 97331

Abstract

Herbicide resistance jeopardizes the usefulness of valuable chemical tools and, therefore, weed management in many crop systems. Models must be developed to evaluate management tactics that prevent, delay, or reduce resistance. The complexity of biological processes involved in herbicide resistance also requires models to focus research and to integrate experiments. A population model was developed that improves upon previous attempts to predict herbicide resistance dynamics. The model incorporates plant population demographics with the Hardy-Weinberg concept for gene segregation. The model simulates the evolution, spread, and subsequent dynamics of resistance in the presence and absence of a herbicide. Analysis of model simulations identified two sets of biological processes as key factors in the evolution and dynamics of herbicide-resistant weed populations. These are processes that influence ecological fitness and gene flow. Several options are suggested as examples for the management of resistant weed populations.

Type
Feature
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Conard, S. G., and Radosevich, S. R. 1979. Ecological fitness of Senecio vulgaris and Amaranthus retroflexus biotypes susceptible or resistant to triazine. J. Appl. Ecol. 16:171177.Google Scholar
2. Crow, J. F. 1986. Basic Concepts in Population, Quantitative, and Evolutionary Genetics. W. H. Freeman and Co., New York. p. 2953.Google Scholar
3. Crow, J. F., and Kimura, M. 1970. An Introduction to Population Genetics Theory. Harper and Row, New York.Google Scholar
4. Cousens, R. 1987. Theory and reality of weed control thresholds. Plant Prot. Quart. 2:1320.Google Scholar
5. Firbank, L. G., and Watkinson, A. R. 1985. On the analysis of competition within two species mixtures of plants. J. Appl. Ecol. 22:503517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Fitt, D. L., Gregory, P. H., Todd, A. D., McCartney, H. A., and Macdonald, O. C. 1987. Spore dispersal and plant disease gradients; a comparison between two empirical models. J. Phytopathol. 118:227242.Google Scholar
7. Georghiou, G. P., and Taylor, C. E. 1986. Factors influencing the evolution of resistance. p. 7485 in Pesticide Resistance: Strategies and Tactics for Management. Natl. Acad. Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
8. Gressel, J. 1986. Modes and genetics of herbicide resistances in plants. p. 5473 in Pesticide Resistance: Strategies and Tactics for Management. Natl. Acad. Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
9. Gressel, J. 1987. Appearance of single and multi-group herbicide resistances and strategies for their prevention. Proc. Br. Crop Prot. Conf., Brighton, England.Google Scholar
10. Gressel, J., and Segel, L. A. 1978. The paucity of plants evolving genetic resistance to herbicides: possible reasons and implications. J. Theor. Biol. 75:349371.Google Scholar
11. Gressel, J., and Segel, L. A. 1982. Interrelating factors controlling the rate of appearance of resistance: the outlook for the future. p. 325348 in LeBaron, H. M. and Gressel, J., ed. Herbicide Resistance in Plants. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
12. Harper, J. L. 1977. The population biology of plants. Academic Press, London. p. 3960.Google Scholar
13. Heap, I., and Knight, R. 1982. A population of ryegrass tolerant to the herbicide diclofop-methyl. J. Aust. Inst. Agric. Sci. 48:156157.Google Scholar
14. Holt, J. S., and Radosevich, S. R. 1983. Differential growth of two common groundsel (Senecio vulgaris) biotypes. Weed Sci. 31:112115.Google Scholar
15. LeBaron, H. M., and Gressel, J., ed. 1982. Herbicide Resistance in Plants. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
16. Levin, D. A., and Kerster, H. W. 1974. Gene flow in seed plants. Evol. Biol. 7:139220.Google Scholar
17. Li, C. C. 1976. First Course in Population Genetics. Boxwood Press, Pacific Grove, CA.Google Scholar
18. Maxwell, B. D., Wilson, M. V., and Radosevich, S. R. 1988. Population modeling approach for evaluating leafy spurge development and control. Weed Technol. 2:132138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. May, R. M., and Dobson, A. P. 1986. Population dynamics and the rate of evolution of pesticide resistance. p. 170193 in Pesticide Resistance: Strategies and Tactics for Management. Natl. Acad. Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
20. Moloney, K. A. 1988. Fine-scale spatial and temporal variation in demography of a perennial bunchgrass. Ecology 69:15881598.Google Scholar
21. Mortimer, A. M. 1983. On weed demography. p. 340 in Fletcher, W. W., ed. Recent Advances in Weed Research. Commonwealth Agric. Bureaux, England.Google Scholar
22. Mudge, L. C., Gossett, B. J., and Murphy, T. R. 1984. Resistance of goosegrass (Eleusine indica) to dinitroaniline herbicides. Weed Sci. 32:591594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Mundt, C. C. 1989. Use of the modified Gregory model to describe primary disease gradients of wheat leaf rust produced from an area source of inoculum. Phytopathology 79:(In press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Mundt, C. C., and Brophy, L. S. 1988. Influence of number of host genotype units on the effectiveness of host mixtures for disease control: a modeling approach. Phytopathology 78:10871094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. National Research Council. 1986. Pesticide Resistance, Strategies and Tactics for Management. Natl. Acad. Press, Washington, DC. p. 1170.Google Scholar
26. Radosevich, S. R., and Appleby, A. P. 1973. Relative susceptibility of two common groundsel (Senecio vulgaris L.) biotypes to six s-triazines. Agron. J. 65:553555.26.Google Scholar
27. Radosevich, S. R., and Appleby, A. P. 1973. Studies on the s-triazines resistance in common groundsel (Senecio vulgaris L.). Weed Sci. 21:497500.Google Scholar
28. Radosevich, S. R., and Holt, J. S. 1984. Weed Ecology, Implications for Vegetation Management. John Wiley and Sons, New York. p. 203222.Google Scholar
29. Roush, R. T., and Croft, B. A. 1986. Experimental population genetics and ecological studies of pesticide resistance in insects and mites. p. 257270 in Pesticide Resistance: Strategies and Tactics for Management. Natl. Acad. Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
30. Ryan, G. F. 1970. Resistance of common groundsel to simazine and atrazine. Weed Sci. 18:614616.Google Scholar
31. Silvertown, J. W. 1982. Introduction to Plant Population Ecology. Longmann, London. p. 414.Google Scholar
32. Spain, J. D. 1982. BASIC Microcomputer Models in Biology. Addison-Wesley Pub. Co., Reading, MA. p. 124145.Google Scholar
33. Stanger, C. E., and Appleby, A. P. 1989. Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) accessions tolerant to diclofop. Weed Sci. 37:350352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34. Tabashnik, B. E. 1986. Resistance management. p. 194206 in Pesticide Resistance: Strategies and Tactics for Management. Natl. Acad. Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
35. Valverde, B. E., Radosevich, S. R., and Appleby, A. P. 1988. Growth and competitive ability of dinitroaniline-herbicide resistant and susceptible goosegrass (Eleusine indica). Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 41:81.Google Scholar
36. Via, S. 1986. Pesticide resistance. p. 222235 in Pesticide Resistance: Strategies and Tactics for Management. Natl. Acad. Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
37. Wolfe, M. S., and Barrett, J. A. 1986. Response of plant pathogens to fungicides. p. 245256 in Pesticide Resistance: Strategies and Tactics for Management. Natl. Acad. Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
38. Wright, S. 1972. Coefficients of inbreeding and relationship. Am. Nat. 56:330338.Google Scholar