Hostname: page-component-6bb9c88b65-t28k2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-25T03:31:46.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Redstem Filaree (Erodium cicutarium) Development and Productivity Under Noncompetitive Conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Robert E. Blackshaw  and
K. Neil Harker
Robert E. Blackshaw
Affiliation:
Research Center, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, P.O. Box 3000, Lethbridge, AB, Canada T1J 4B1
K. Neil Harker
Affiliation:
Research Center, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 6000 C & E Trail, Lacombe, AB, Canada T0C IS0
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Redstem filaree is becoming widespread and abundant on the Canadian prairies. A field study was conducted to determine the growth, development, and seed yield response of redstem filaree when grown under noncropped conditions and planted at various dates throughout the growing season in Alberta. Redstem filaree emerged within 7 to 13 d of planting with an accumulated 57 to 134 growing degree days (GDD). Flowering occurred within 46 to 65 d (327 to 779 GDD) of planting. Plants that emerged in August or later did not flower in that season and survived as winter annuals. Spring-emerging redstem filaree plants matured within 79 to 100 d (729 to 1,193 GDD). Plants that emerged in May and June attained more biomass and produced threefold more seeds than plants that emerged in July or later. Redstem filaree seed production ranged from 2,400 to 9,900 seeds/plant depending on emergence date and environmental conditions. Information from this study will assist in developing integrated management strategies for this increasingly important weed.

Keywords

Redstem filaree, Erodium cicutarium (L.) L'Her. Ex Ait. # EROCIBiomassemergencephenologyseed yieldEROCIGDD, growing degree days

Information

Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 12 , Issue 4 , December 1998 , pp. 590 - 594
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous. 1992. Alberta Cereals and Oilseeds Crop Protection Survey. Edmonton, AB, Canada: Alberta Agriculture, Food and Rural Development. 86 p.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1997. Crop Protection with Chemicals. Agdex 606-1. Edmonton, AB, Canada: Alberta Agriculture, Food and Rural Development. pp. 38–239.Google Scholar
Ball, D. A., Klepper, B., and Rydrych, D. J. 1995. Comparative above-ground development rates for several annual grass weeds and cereal grains. Weed Sci. 43:410–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackshaw, R. E. 1992. Soil temperature, soil moisture, and seed burial effects on redstem filaree (Erodium cicutarium) emergence. Weed Sci. 40:204–207.Google Scholar
Blackshaw, R. E. and Entz, T. 1995. Day and night temperature effects on vegetative growth of Erodium cicutarium . Weed Res. 35:471–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackshaw, R. E. and Harker, K. N. 1998. Erodium cicutarium density and duration of interference effects on yield of wheat, oilseed rape, pea, and dry bean. Weed Res. 38:55–62.Google Scholar
Cox, J. A. and Conran, J. G. 1996. The effect of water stress on the life cycles of Erodium crinitum Carolin and Erodium cicutarium (L.) L'Herit. Ex Aiton (Geraniaceae). Aust. J. Ecol. 21:235–240.Google Scholar
Cudney, D. W., Orloff, S. B., and Adams, C. J. 1993. Improving weed control with 2,4-DB amine in seedling alfalfa (Medicago sativa). Weed Technol. 7:465–470.Google Scholar
Forcella, F. 1992. Prediction of weed seedling densities from buried seed reserves. Weed Res. 32:29–38.Google Scholar
Forcella, F. 1993. Seedling emergence model for velvetleaf. Agron. J. 85:929–933.Google Scholar
Fresnillo-Fedorenko, D. E., Fernandez, O. A., Busso, C. A., and Elia, O. E. 1996. Phenology of Medicago minima and Erodium cicutarium in semiarid Argentina. J. Arid Environ. 33:409–416.Google Scholar
Harmon, G. D. and Stamp, N. E. 1992. Effects of postdispersal seed predation on spatial inequality and size variability in an annual plant, Erodium cicutarium (Geraniaceae). Am. J. Bot. 79:300–305.Google Scholar
Hull, A. C. 1973. Germination of range plant seeds after long periods of uncontrolled storage. J. Range Manage. 26:198–200.Google Scholar
Palmer, T. P. 1976. Annual weeds in established lucerne. Proc. New Zealand Weed and Pest Control Conf. 29:5–8.Google Scholar
Patterson, D. T. 1985. Comparative ecophysiology of weeds and crops. In Duke, S. O., ed. Weed Physiology. Volume 1. Reproduction and Ecophysiology. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. pp. 101–129.Google Scholar
Pelaez, D. V., Busso, C. A., Elia, O. R., Pedorenko, D.E.F., and Fernandez, O. A. 1995. Demography and growth of Medicago minima and Erodium cicutarium: water stress effects. J. Arid Environ. 30:75–81.Google Scholar
Rice, K. J. 1990. Reproductive hierarchies in Erodium: effects of variation in plant density and rainfall distribution. Ecology 71:1316–1322.Google Scholar
Russelo, D., Edey, S., and Godfrey, J. 1974. Selected Tables and Conversions used in Agrometeorology and Related Fields. Ottawa, ON: Canada Department of Agriculture Publ. 1522.Google Scholar
Steel, R.G.D. and Torrie, J. H. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill. 633 p.Google Scholar
Stephenson, D. W. 1992. Seed biology of some broadleaved weeds occurring in south Australia: a review. Proc. First Int. Weed Control Congr. 2:488–494.Google Scholar
Thomas, A. G., Wise, R. F., Frick, B. L., and Juras, L. T. 1995. Saskatchewan Weed Survey: Cereal, Oilseed and Pulse Crops. Saskatoon, SK: Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. 419 p.Google Scholar
Venter, H.J.T. and Verhoeven, R. L. 1990. The genus Erodium in southern Africa. South Afr. J. Bot. 1:79–92.Google Scholar
Wilen, C. A. and Holt, J. S. 1995. Prediction of yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus L.) emergence using a degree day model. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 35:52.Google Scholar