Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T15:26:59.983Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reduction of Torpedograss (Panicum repens) Canopy and Rhizomes by Quinclorac Split Applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Philip Busey*
Affiliation:
Environmental Horticulture, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Fort Lauderdale Research and Education Center, 3205 College Avenue, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33314
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: turf@ufl.edu

Abstract

Two field experiments were conducted to evaluate the reduction of torpedograss canopy by multiple split applications of quinclorac applied postemergence (POST) to bermudagrass golf course roughs in Florida. In one experiment, quinclorac treatments were reapplied for a second year to the same plots, followed by biomass harvest, to evaluate the reduction of torpedograss rhizomes. Quinclorac sprayed at 1.68 kg/ha/yr visually reduced torpedograss canopy to a varying extent, depending on the number of split applications. The most effective treatment, 0.42 kg/ha quinclorac applied four times each year for 2 yr, reduced torpedograss canopy to 10% compared with 86% torpedograss canopy in the untreated plots, and reduced torpedograss dry weight to 1,570 kg/ha compared with 8,010 kg/ha in the untreated plots. After reapplication for 2 yr with the commercially labeled treatment, quinclorac at 0.84 kg/ha applied twice per year, torpedograss canopy was reduced to 45% and dry weight to 4,640 kg/ha. Visual evaluation of canopy was too optimistic in representing the herbicidal control of torpedograss by quinclorac because torpedograss regrew from rhizomes, and canopy was a relatively small part of the plant. In plots not chemically treated, pachymorph rhizomes were 63%, leptomorph rhizomes were 24%, and leaves were only 13% of the total dry weight of torpedograss.

Type
Note
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Brecke, B. J., Unruh, J. B., and Dusky, J. A. 2001. Torpedograss (Panicum repens) control with quinclorac in bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon × C. transvaalensis) turf. Weed Technol. 15: 732756.Google Scholar
Holm, L. G., Plucknett, D. L., Pancho, J. V., and Hersberger, J. P. 1977. The World's Worst Weeds: Distribution and Biology. Honolulu, HI: University Press of Hawaii.Google Scholar
Holtermann, C. 1907. Einfluss des klimas auf den bau der pflanzengwebe. Leipzig, Germany: Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann.Google Scholar
Hossain, M. A., Ishimine, Y., Akamine, H., Murayama, S., Uddin, S. M. M., and Kuniyoshi, K. 1999. Effect of burial depth on emergence of Panicum repens . Weed Sci. 47: 651656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarty, L. B., Higgins, J. M., and Colvin, D. L. 1993. Selective torpedograss (Panicum repens) control in bermudagrass (Cynodon spp.) turf. Weed Technol. 7: 911915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClure, F. A. 1966. The Bamboos: A Fresh Perspective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.Google Scholar
Sokal, R. R. and Rohlf, F. J. 1981. Biometry. 2nd ed. San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Sutton, D. L. 1996. Growth of torpedograss from rhizomes planted under flooded conditions. J. Aquat. Plant Manag. 34: 5053.Google Scholar
Wilcut, J. W., Dute, R. R., Truelove, B., and Davis, D. E. 1988. Factors limiting the distribution of cogongrass, Imperata cylindrica, and torpedograss, Panicum repens . Weed Sci. 36: 577582.Google Scholar