Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Residual Weeds of Processing Sweet Corn in the North Central Region

  • Martin M. Williams (a1), Tom L. Rabaey (a2) and Chris M. Boerboom (a1)
Abstract

Knowledge of weed community structure in vegetable crops of the north central region (NCR) is poor. To characterize weed species composition present at harvest (hereafter called residual weeds) in processing sweet corn, 175 fields were surveyed in Illinois, Minnesota, and Wisconsin from 2005 to 2007. Weed density was enumerated by species in thirty 1-m2 quadrats placed randomly along a 300- to 500-m loop through the field, and additional species observed outside quadrats were also recorded. Based on weed community composition, population density, and mean plant size, overall weed interference level was rated. A total of 56 residual weed species were observed and no single species dominated the community of NCR processing sweet corn. Several of the most abundant species, such as common lambsquarters and velvetleaf, have been problems for many years, while other species, like wild-proso millet, have become problematic in only the last 20 yr. Compared to a survey of weeds in sweet corn more than 40 yr ago, greater use of herbicides is associated with reductions in weed density by approximately an order of magnitude; however, 57% of fields appeared to suffer yield loss due to weeds. Sweet corn harvest in the NCR ranges from July into early October. Earlier harvests were characterized by some of the highest weed densities, while late-emerging weeds such as eastern black nightshade occurred in fields harvested after August. Fall panicum, giant foxtail, wild-proso millet, common lambsquarters, and velvetleaf were the most abundant species across the NCR, yet each state had some unique dominant weeds.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Corresponding author's E-mail: Martin.Williams@ARS.USDA.GOV.
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

J. F. Alex 1964. Weeds of tomato and corn fields in two regions of Ontario. Weed Res 4:308318.

F. Azanza , A. Bar-Zur , and J. A. Juvik 1996. Variation in sweet corn kernel characteristics associated with stand establishment and eating quality. Euphytica 87:718.

J. E. Creech and W. G. Johnson 2006. Survey of broadleaf winter weeds in Indiana production fields infested with soybean cyst nematode (Heterodera glycines). Weed Technol 20:10661075.

S. A. Dewey and K. A. Andersen 2004. Distinct roles of surveys, inventories, and monitoring in adaptive weed management. Weed Technol 18:14491452.

B. Frick and A. G. Thomas 1992. Weed surveys in different tillage systems in southwestern Ontario field crops. Can. J. Plant Sci 72:13371347.

K. D. Gibson , W. G. Johnson , and D. E. Hillger 2006. Farmer perceptions of weed problems in corn and soybean rotation systems. Weed Technol 20:751755.

S. A. Gower , M. M. Loux , J. Cardina , and S. K. Harrison 2002. Effect of planting date, residual herbicide, and postemergent application timing on weed control and grain yield in glyphosate-tolerant corn. Weed Technol 16:488494.

D. E. Hillger , S. C. Weller , E. T. Maynard , and K. D. Gibson Emergent weed communities associated with tomato production systems in Indiana. Weed Sci 54:11061112.

J. O'Sullivan , J. Zandstra , and P. Sikkema 2002. Sweet corn (Zea mays) cultivar sensitivity to mesotrione. Weed Technol 16:421425.

A. G. Thomas and M. R. T. Dale 1991. Weed community structure in spring-seeded crops in Manitoba. Can. J. Plant Sci 71:10691080.

C. L. Treat and W. F. Tracy 1994. Endosperm type effects on biomass production and on stalk and root quality in sweet corn. Crop Sci 34:396399.

R. C. Van Acker , A. G. Thomas , J. Y. Leeson , S. Z. Knezevic , and B. L. Frick 2000. Comparison of weed communities in Manitoba ecoregions and crops. Can. J. Plant Sci 80:963972.

B. J. Williams and R. G. Harvey 2000. Effect of nicosulfuron timing on wild-proso millet (Panicum miliaceum) control in sweet corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol 14:377382.

M. M. Williams II, R. A. Boydston , and A. S. Davis 2008b. Crop competitive ability contributes to herbicide performance in sweet corn. Weed Res 48:5867.

M. M. Williams II and J. L. Lindquist 2007. Influence of planting date and weed interference on sweet corn growth and development. Agron. J. 99:10661072.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Weed Technology
  • ISSN: 0890-037X
  • EISSN: 1550-2740
  • URL: /core/journals/weed-technology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 2 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 19 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 20th January 2017 - 28th July 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.