Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T10:55:02.743Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response of Yellow Starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis) and Grass Biomass to Grass, Picloram, and Fertilizer Combinations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Larry L. Larson  and
Michael L. McInnis
Larry L. Larson
Affiliation:
Dep. Rangeland Resources, Oreg. State Univ., OSU Agric. Program, EOSC, LaGrande, OR 97850
Michael L. McInnis
Affiliation:
Dep. Rangeland Resources, Oreg. State Univ., OSU Agric. Program, EOSC, LaGrande, OR 97850
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A 2-yr study was conducted to evaluate the response of yellow starthistle density and grass biomass to combinations of newly seeded grass, picloram, and fertilizer. A combination of ‘Tualatin’ tall oatgrass or ‘Paiute’ orchardgrass with 0.14 or 0.28 kg ae/ha of picloram effectively controlled yellow starthistle and improved forage production. Grass seeded alone or combined with fertilizer neither controlled yellow starthistle nor improved forage production. Three-way combinations of grass, picloram, and fertilizer did not affect yellow starthistle density in either year but resulted in more ‘Tualatin’ tall oatgrass biomass in 1987.

Keywords

Picloram, 4-amino-3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinecarboxylic acidorchardgrass, Dactylis glomerata L. ♯3 DACGLtall oatgrass, Arrhenatherum elatius (L.)Beauv. ex J. & C. Presl. ♯ ARRELyellow starthistle, Centaurea solstitialis L. ♯ CENSOPoa compressa L. ♯ POACO
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 3 , Issue 3 , September 1989 , pp. 497 - 500
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Kay, B. L. 1966. Fertilization of cheatgrass ranges in California. J. Range Manage. 19:217–220.Google Scholar
2. Callihan, R. H., Sheley, R. L., and Huston, C. M. 1984. Nature and prospects for control of yellow starthistle. p. 37–42 in Proc. Knapweed Symp., Mont. St Univ. Coop. Ext Bull. 1315.Google Scholar
3. Cochran, W. G., and Cox, G. M. 1968. Experimental Designs. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York.Google Scholar
4. Cook, C. W. 1965. Plant and livestock response to fertilized rangeland. Utah State Univ. Bull. 455.Google Scholar
5. Huston, C. M., Callihan, R. H., and Sheley, R. L. 1984. Reseeding intermediate wheatgrass in yellow starthistle-infested rangeland. p. 42–44 in Proc. Knapweed Symp., Mont. St. Univ. Coop. Ext. Bull. 1315.Google Scholar
6. Kingsbury, J. M. 1964. Poisonous Plants of the United States and Canada. Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
7. Maddox, D. M. 1979. The knapweeds: their economics and biological control in the western states, USA. Rangelands 1:139–141.Google Scholar
8. Maddox, D. M., and Mayfield, A. 1985. Yellow starthistle infestations are on the increase. Calif. Agric. 39(11–12):10–12.Google Scholar
9. Maddox, D. M., Sobhian, R., Joley, D. B., Mayfield, A., and Supkoff, D. 1986. New biological control for yellow starthistle. Calif. Agric. 40(11–12):4–5.Google Scholar
10. Roche', B. F. Jr., and Talbott, C. J. 1986. The collection history of Centaureas found in Washington state. Agric. Res. Cent., Wash. State Univ., Pullman.Google Scholar
11. Steel, R. G., and Torrie, J. H. 1960. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. McGraw–Hill Book Co. Inc., New York.Google Scholar
12. Talbott, C. J. 1987. Distribution and ecologic amplitude of selected Centaurea species in eastern Washington. M.S. thesis. Wash. State Univ., Pullman.Google Scholar