Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T21:44:49.623Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘Russet Burbank’ Potato Tolerance to Dimethenamid-p

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Pamela J. S. Hutchinson ,
Corey V. Ransom ,
Dennis J. Tonks  and
Charlotte V. Eberlein
Pamela J. S. Hutchinson*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant, Soil, and Entomological Sciences, University of Idaho, Aberdeen, ID, 83210
Corey V. Ransom
Affiliation:
Malheur Experiment Station, Oregon State University, Ontario, OR, 97914
Dennis J. Tonks
Affiliation:
Washington State University, Davenport, WA, 99122
Charlotte V. Eberlein
Affiliation:
Cooperative Extension, University of Idaho, Twin Falls, ID, 83303
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: phutch@uidaho.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

‘Russet Burbank’ potato tolerance to dimethenamid-p applied preemergence at 0.7, 1.4, or 2.9 kg ai/ha was assessed in field studies conducted at Aberdeen, ID and Ontario, OR. Although crop injury was evident approximately 2 wk after treatment, most injury had diminished by row closure 2- to 3-wk later. Initial injury did not translate to yield loss and U.S. No. 1 and total tuber yields in dimethenamid-p–treated plots were similar to yields in the untreated, weed-free control.

Keywords

Dimethenamid-ppotato, Solanum tuberosum L. ‘Russet Burbank’Crop safetycrop toleranceherbicide injuryEPTC, S-ethyl dipropyl carbamothioatePNW, Pacific NorthwestWAT, weeks after treatment
Type
Note
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 18 , Issue 3 , September 2004 , pp. 850 - 852
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

∗ University of Idaho Agricultural Experiment Station Paper 03745.

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous. 1997. Matrix herbicide supplemental label. DuPont Publication No. H-653284. Wilmington, DE: DuPont. 1 p.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 2000. Outlook product label. NVA 2000-4-086-0035. Research Triangle Park, NC: BASF. 6 p.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 2001a. Matrix product label. DuPont Publication SL-774050201, H-64064. Wilmington, DE: DuPont. 5 p.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 2001b. Economic Research Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture. Web page: http://www.ers-usda.gov/briefing/potatoes/potatofacts.htm. Accessed: March 1, 2003.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 2002. Idaho Agricultural Statistics. Boise, ID: Idaho Agricultural Statistics Service. 65 p.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 2003. Interregional Research Project #4: Minor Use Program. Web page: http://pestdata.ncsu.edu/ir-4/ Accessed: May 1, 2003.Google Scholar
Arnold, R. N. and Gregory, E. J. 1994. Broadleaf weed control in field potatoes. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci 47:17.Google Scholar
Courdechet, M., Bocoin, P. F., Chollet, R., Seckinger, K., and Boger, P. 1997. Biological activity of two stereoisomers of the N-thienyl chloroacetamide herbicide dimethenamid. Pestic. Sci 50:221–227.Google Scholar
Eberlein, C. V., Kral, C. W., and Guttieri, M. J. 1996. Using Matrix in Weed Management Systems for Potatoes. CIS No. 1037. Moscow, ID: Ag Publications, University of Idaho. 8 p.Google Scholar
Eberlein, C. V., Whitmore, J. C., Stanger, C. E., and Guttieri, M. J. 1994. Postemergence weed control in potatoes (Solanum tuberosum) with rimsulfuron. Weed Technol. 8:428–435.Google Scholar
Guttieri, M. J. and Eberlein, C. V. 1997. Preemergence weed control in potatoes (Solanum tuberosum) with rimsulfuron mixtures. Weed Technol. 11:755–761.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, P. J. S. 2003. Potatoes. in William, R. D. and Dailey, A. G., eds. Pacific Northwest 2003 Weed Management Handbook. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University Extension Station and Communications. Pp. 175–187.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, P. J. S. and Eberlein, C. V. 2003. Weed management. in Stark, J. C. and Love, S. L., eds. Potato Production Systems. Moscow, ID: University of Idaho Agricultural Communications. Pp. 241–283.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, P. J. S., Tonks, D. J., and Fletcher, F. E. 2002. Weed control with developmental preemergence herbicides in potatoes. Western Society of Weed Science 2002 Research Progress Rep. ISSN-0090-8142. Pp. 34–35.Google Scholar
Sarpe, N., Chirita, N., Budoi, G., and Hogea, C. 1994. Research works on both selectivity and efficacy of the herbicides dimethenamid, alachlor and pendimethalin (mixed with metribuzin or linuron) for potato crop. in Proceeding of the 46th International Symposium on Crop Protection: Part IV. Vol. 59. Pp. 1361–1365.Google Scholar
Tonks, D. J. and Eberlein, C. V. 2001. Postemergence weed control with rimsulfuron and various adjuvants in potato (Solanum tuberosum). Weed Technol. 15:613–616.Google Scholar
Tonks, D. J., Eberlein, C. V., Guttieri, M. J., and Brinkman, B. A. 1999. SAN 582 efficacy and tolerance in potato (Solanum tuberosum). Weed Technol. 13:71–76.Google Scholar