Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Selecting for Weed Resistance: Herbicide Rotation and Mixture

  • Hugh J. Beckie (a1) and Xavier Reboud (a2)
Abstract

Herbicide rotations and mixtures are widely recommended to manage herbicide resistance. However, little research has quantified how these practices actually affect the selection of herbicide resistance in weeds. A 4-yr experiment was conducted in western Canada from 2004 to 2007 to examine the impact of herbicide rotation and mixture in selecting for acetolactate synthase (ALS) inhibitor resistance in the annual broadleaf weed, field pennycress, co-occurring in wheat. Treatments consisted of the ALS-inhibitor herbicide, ethametsulfuron, applied in a mixture with bromoxynil/MCPA formulated herbicide (photosystem-II inhibitor/synthetic auxin), or in rotation with the non-ALS inhibitor at an ALS-inhibitor application frequency of 0, 25, 50, 75, and 100% (i.e., zero to four applications, respectively) over the 4-yr period. The field pennycress seed bank at the start of the experiment contained 5% ethametsulfuron-resistant seed. Although weed control was only marginally reduced, resistance frequency of progeny of survivors increased markedly after one ALS-inhibitor application. At the end of the experiment, the level of resistance in the seed bank was buffered by susceptible seed, increasing from 29% of recruited seedlings after one application to 85% after four applications of the ALS inhibitor. The level of resistance in the seed bank for the mixture treatment after 4 yr remained similar to that of the nontreated (weedy) control or 0% ALS-inhibitor rotation frequency treatment. The results of this study demonstrate how rapidly ALS-inhibitor resistance can evolve as a consequence of repeated application of herbicides with this site of action, and supports epidemiological information from farmer questionnaire surveys and modeling simulations that mixtures are more effective than rotations in mitigating resistance evolution through herbicide selection.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Corresponding author's E-mail: Hugh.Beckie@agr.gc.ca.
References
Hide All
Beckie H. J. 2006. Herbicide-resistant weeds: management tactics and practices. Weed Technol 20:793814.
Beckie H. J. 2007. Beneficial management practices to combat herbicide-resistant grass weeds in the Northern Great Plains. Weed Technol 21:290299.
Beckie H. J. 2009. Herbicide-resistant weeds on the march in Alberta. Pages 97106. in. Agronomy Update 2009. Lethbridge, AB: Southern Applied Research Association.
Beckie H. J., Chang F., and Stevenson F. C. 1999. The effect of labeling herbicides with their site of action: a Canadian perspective. Weed Technol 13:655661.
Beckie H. J., Hall L. M., and Tardif F. J. 2001. Impact and management of herbicide-resistant weeds in Canada. Pages 747754. in. Proceedings of the Brighton Crop Protection Conference—Weeds. Farnham, UK British Crop Protection Council.
Beckie H. J., Hall L. M., Tardif F. J., and Séguin-Swartz G. 2007. Acetolactate synthase inhibitor-resistant stinkweed (Thlaspi arvense L.) in Alberta. Can. J. Plant Sci 87:965972.
Beckie H. J. and Jana S. 2000. Selecting for triallate resistance in wild oat. Can. J. Plant Sci 80:665667.
Beckie H. J., Leeson J. Y., Thomas A. G., Brenzil C. A., Hall L. M., Holzgang G., Lozinski C., and Shirriff S. 2008a. Weed resistance monitoring in the Canadian prairies. Weed Technol 22:530543.
Beckie H. J., Leeson J. Y., Thomas A. G., Hall L. M., and Brenzil C. A. 2008b. Risk assessment of weed resistance in the Canadian prairies. Weed Technol 22:741746.
Bertram M. G. and Pedersen P. 2004. Adjusting management practices using glyphosate-resistant soybean cultivars. Agron. J. 96:462468.
Best K. F. and McIntyre G. I. 1975. The biology of Canadian weeds. 9. Thlaspi arvense L. Can. J. Plant Sci 55:279292.
Bourgeois L., Morrison I. N., and Kelner D. 1997. Field and grower survey of ACCase resistant wild oat in Manitoba. Can. J. Plant Sci 77:709715.
Diggle A. J., Neve P. B., and Smith F. P. 2003. Herbicides used in combination can reduce the probability of herbicide resistance in finite weed populations. Weed Res 43:371382.
Friesen L. F., Beckie H. J., Warwick S. I., and Van Acker R. C. 2009. The biology of Canadian weeds. 138. Kochia scoparia (L.) Schrad. Can. J. Plant Sci 89:141167.
Gomez K. A. and Gomez A. A. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons. 421422.
Hall L. M., Stromme K. M., Horsman G. P., and Devine M. D. 1998. Resistance to acetolactate synthase inhibitors and quinclorac in a biotype of false cleavers (Galium spurium). Weed Sci 46:390396.
Hume L. 1990. Influence of emergence date and strain on phenology, seed production, and germination of Thlaspi arvense L. Bot. Gaz 151:510515.
Hume L. 1993. Development of equations for estimating yield losses caused by multi-species weed communities dominated by green foxtail [Setaria viridis (L) Beauv.]. Can. J. Plant Sci 73:625635.
Jasieniuk M., Brŭlé-Babel A. L., and Morrison I. N. 1996. The evolution and genetics of herbicide resistance in weeds. Weed Sci 44:176193.
Kvalseth T. O. 1985. Cautionary note about R 2 . Am. Stat 39:279285.
Leeson J. Y., Thomas A. G., Hall L. M., Brenzil C. A., Andrews T., Brown K. R., and Van Acker R. C. 2005. Prairie Weed Surveys of Cereal, Oilseed and Pulse crops from the 1970s to the 2000s. Weed Survey Series Publication 05-1. Saskatoon, SK: Saskatoon Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. 395.
Légère A., Beckie H. J., Stevenson F. C., and Thomas A. G. 2000. Survey of management practices affecting the occurrence of wild oat (Avena fatua) resistance to acetyl-CoA carboxylase inhibitors. Weed Technol 14:366376.
Mallory-Smith C. A. and Retzinger E. J. Jr. 2003. Revised classification of herbicides by site of action for weed resistance management strategies. Weed Technol 17:605619.
Powles S. B., Preston C., Bryan I. B., and Jutsum A. R. 1997. Herbicide resistance: impact and management. Adv. Agron 58:5793.
Rubin B. 1991. Herbicide resistance in weeds and crops, progress and prospects. Pages 387414. In Caseley J. C., Cussans G. W., and Atkin R. K. Herbicide Resistance in Weeds and Crops. Oxford, U.K.: Butterworth-Heinemann.
SAS 1999. SAS Online Doc®. Version 8. Cary, NC: SAS Institute. http://v8doc.sas.com/sashtml.
Saskatchewan Ministry of Agriculture 2008. Guide to Crop Protection: Weeds, Plant Diseases, Insects. Regina, SK: Saskatchewan Ministry of Agriculture. 399.
Shaner D. L., Howard S., and Chalmers I. 1999. Effectiveness of mode of action labeling for resistance management: a survey of Australian farmers. Pages 797802. in. Proceedings of the Brighton Crop Protection Conference—Weeds. Farnham, UK British Crop Protection Council.
Statistics Canada 2008. September Estimate of Production of Principal Field Crops, Canada. Field Crop Reporting Series, No. 22-002-X. Ottawa, ON: Statistics Canada. http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/22-002-x/22-002-x2008007-eng.pdf. Accessed: April 6, 2009.
Van Acker R. C. 2009. Weed biology serves practical weed management. Weed Res 49:15.
Warwick S. I., Francis A., and Susko D. J. 2002. The biology of Canadian weeds. 9. Thlaspi arvense L. (updated). Can. J. Plant Sci 82:803823.
Wrubel R. P. and Gressel J. 1994. Are herbicide mixtures useful for delaying the rapid evolution of resistance? A case study. Weed Technol 8:635648.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Weed Technology
  • ISSN: 0890-037X
  • EISSN: 1550-2740
  • URL: /core/journals/weed-technology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 14 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 213 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 20th January 2017 - 20th February 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.