Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T04:48:28.195Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Selection of Herbicide Alternatives Based on Probable Leaching to Groundwater

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Ralph E. Franklin ,
Virgil L. Quisenberry ,
Billy J. Gossett  and
Edward C. Murdock
Ralph E. Franklin
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. Soils, Clemson Univ., Clemson, SC 29634
Virgil L. Quisenberry
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. Soils, Clemson Univ., Clemson, SC 29634
Billy J. Gossett
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. Soils, Clemson Univ., Clemson, SC 29634
Edward C. Murdock
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. Soils, Clemson Univ., Clemson, SC 29634
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Extension workers are sensing pressure to use soils information and chemical characteristics data to guide farmers in selecting pesticides least prone to leach into groundwater. Our objective was to estimate differences in herbicide migration to groundwater under conditions typical for the Southeast Coastal Plain, and to consider how a farmer might be advised to use such knowledge in selecting herbicides. We used a simple computer code for microcomputers to predict persistence and migration of 17 herbicides through a hypothetical, coarse-textured soil typical of the Southeast Coastal Plain. Appropriate herbicides were selected for several common crop-weed problems, such as sicklepod in soybean and Palmer amaranth in corn. Groundwater was assumed to be 3.15 m below the soil surface. Herbicides selected covered a broad range of half-lives and organic carbon partition coefficients. Only after the first-order degradation rate constant was reduced by a factor of five did predicted soil water concentrations of several herbicides at the groundwater interface reach normal detection limits. Still, predicted concentrations were below the level established for health effects advisory purposes. Due to the large number of uncertainties and the inability to estimate practical benefits, we conclude that data relating to soil and herbicide characteristics cannot be used at this time to override cost effectiveness, efficacy, and other factors normally considered by farmers and Extension professionals in herbicides for weed control.

Keywords

Corn, Zea mays L.soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr.Palmer amaranth, Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats. # AMAPAsicklepod, Cassia obtusifolia L. # CASOBEnvironmental qualityherbicide leachingherbicide selectionwater qualityweed controlacifluorfenalachloratrazinebenefinbentazonchlorimurondicambafluometuronimazaquinmetolachlormetribuzinnorflurazonpendimethalinsimazinetrifensulfurontrifluralin2,4-DXanthium strumariumIpomoea sppDigitaria ciliarisAMAPACASOBDIGSPIPOZZXANST
Type
Feature
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , March 1994 , pp. 6 - 16
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Agricultural Chemical Handbook. 1993. Coop. Ext. Serv. Clemson U. EC 670. 974 p.Google Scholar
2. Anderson, W. P. 1983. Weed Science: Principles. West Publishing Co., St. Paul, MN. 655 p.Google Scholar
3. Armstrong, D. E., Chesters, G., and Harris, R. F. 1967. Atrazine hydrolysis in soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 31:61–66.Google Scholar
4. Behl, R. and Eden, C. A. 1991. Field-scale monitoring studies to evaluate the mobility of pesticides in soil and groundwater. P. 27–47 in Ground Water Residue Sampling Design, Am. Chem. Soc. Symp. Ser., No. 465, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
5. Behl, E. 1992. Computer models for fate assessment during the registration process: Data needs. Weed Technol. 6:696–700.Google Scholar
6. Brown, D. S. and Flagg, E. W. 1981. Empirical prediction of organic pollutant sorption in natural sediments. J. Environ. Qual. 10:382–386.Google Scholar
7. Burkhard, N. and Guth, J. A. 1981. Chemical hydrolysis of 2-chloro-4,6-bis (alkylamino)-1,3,5-triazine herbicides and their breakdown in soil under the influence of adsorption. Pestic. Sci. 12:45–52.Google Scholar
8. Burnside, O. C., Fenster, C. R., and Wicks, G. A. 1963. Dissipation and leaching of monuron, simazine, and atrazine in Nebraska soils. Weeds 11:209–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Clearly, R. W. and Ungs, M. J. 1978. Groundwater pollution and hydrology: Mathematical models and computer programs. Report No. 78-WR-15, Water Resources Program, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
10. Davidson, J. M., Rao, P. S. C., Ou, L. T., Wheeler, W. B., and Rathwell, D. F., 1980. Adsorption, movement, and biological degradation of large concentrations of pesticides in soils. EPA-600/2-80-124. Cincinnati, OH.Google Scholar
11. Gelhar, L., Mantoglou, A., Weltz, C., and Rehfeldt, K. 1985. A review of field-scale physical solute transport processes in saturated and unsaturated porous media. Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA. Report EA-4190.Google Scholar
12. Goss, D. W. 1992. Screening procedures for soils and pesticides for potential water quality impacts. Weed Technol. 6:701–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Helling, C. S. 1976. Dinitroaniline herbicides in soils. J. Environ. Qual. 5:1–15.Google Scholar
14. Herbicide Handbook. 1989. Weed Sci. Soc. Am., Champaign, IL. 301 p.Google Scholar
15. Hileman, B. 1990. Alternative agriculture. Chem. Eng. News. Mar. 5, 1990, p. 26–40.Google Scholar
16. Hornsby, A. 1992. Site-specific pesticide recommendations: The final step in environmental impact prevention. Weed Technol. 6:736–742.Google Scholar
17. Hornsby, A. G. and Augustijn-Beckers, P. W. 1991. Handbook, Managing Pesticides for Crop Production and Water Quality. Florida Coop. Ext. Serv., Inst. Food Agric. Sci., Univ. Florida, Gainesville, FL.Google Scholar
18. Howard, P. H. 1989. Handbook of Environmental Fate and Exposure Data for Organic Chemicals. Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, MI.Google Scholar
19. Howard, P. H., Boethling, R. S., Jarvis, W. F., Meylan, W. M., and Michalenko, E. M. 1991. Handbook of Environmental Degradation Rates. Health Taub Printup, ed. Lewis Publ., Chelsea, MI. 725 p.Google Scholar
20. Isensee, A. R., Nash, R. G., and Helling, C. S., 1990. Effect of conventional vs. no-tillage on pesticide leaching to shallow groundwater. J. Environ. Qual. 19:434–440.Google Scholar
21. Junk, G. A., Spalding, R. F., and Richard, J. J. 1980. Areal, vertical, and temporal differences in groundwater chemistry: II. Organic Constituents. J. Environ. Qual. 9:479–483.Google Scholar
22. Kellogg, R. L., Maizel, M. S., and Goss, D. W. 1992. Agricultural chemical use and ground water quality: where are the potential problems? U.S. Dep. Agric, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
23. Mangels, G. 1991. Behavior of the imidazolinone herbicides in soils—a review of the literature. P 191–201 in Shaner, Dale L. and O'Connor, Susan L., eds. The Imidazolinone Herbicides. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
24. Parochetti, J. V. and Hein, E. R. 1973. Volatility and photodecomposition of trifluralin, benefin, and nitralin. Weed Sci. 21:469–473.Google Scholar
25. Pionke, H. B., Gotfelty, D. E., Lucas, A. D., and Urban, J. B. 1988. Pesticide contamination of groundwater in the Mahantango creek watershed. J. Environ. Qual. 17:76–84.Google Scholar
26. Pothuluri, J. V., Moorman, T. B., Obenhuber, D. C., and Wauchope, R. D. 1990. Aerobic and anaerobic degradation of alachlor in samples from a surface-to-groundwater profile. J. Environ. Qual. 19:525–530.Google Scholar
27. Quisenberry, V. L., Cassel, D. K., Dane, J. H., and Parker, J. C. 1987. Physical characteristics of soils of the southern region; Norfolk, Dothan, Wagram, and Goldsboro series. South. Crop. Series Bull. 263. S.C. Agric. Exp. Sta., Clemson, SC 29634.Google Scholar
28. Ross, M. A. and Lembi, C. A. 1985. Applied Weed Science. Burgess Publishing Co., Minneapolis, MN. 340 p.Google Scholar
29. Summers, K. V., Gherini, S. A., Lang, M. M., Ungs, M. J., and Wilkinson, K. J. 1989. MYGRT™ Code Version 2.0: IBM code for simulating migration of organic and inorganic chemicals in groundwater. Report EN-6531. Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA.Google Scholar
30. U.S. Dep. Agric. 1988. Cooperative Extension System National Initiatives, Focus on Issues: Water Quality. National Priority Initiative Task Force—Water Quality. Coop. Ext. System. Washington, D.C. Jan. 1988. 13 p.Google Scholar
31. U.S. Dep. Agric. 1988. Water Quality Education: Challenge for the Cooperative Extension System. Endorsed by ECOP the Extension Committee on Organization and Policy. Coop. Ext. Sys. Washington, D.C. February 1988. 13 p.Google Scholar
32. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1992. Another Look: National Survey of Pesticides in Drinking Water Wells, Phase 2 Report. USEPA Report No. 570/9-91-020, January 1992.Google Scholar
33. van Genuchten, M. T. and Alves, W. J. 1982. Analytical solutions of the one-dimensional convective-dispersive solute transport equation. U.S. Dep. Agric, Tech. Bull. No. 1661.Google Scholar
34. Verschueren, K. 1983. Handbook of Environmental Data on Organic Chemicals. Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., New York. 1310 p.Google Scholar
35. Weber, J. B. 1970. Mechanisms of adsorption of s-triazines by clay colloids and factors affecting plant availability. P. 93–130 in Gunther, Francis A. and Gunther, Jane Davies, eds. Residue Reviews. Springer-Verlag, New York 413 p. Google Scholar
36. Zimdahl, R. L. 1977. Soil degradation of three dinitroanilines. Weed Sci 25:247–251.Google Scholar