Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-bt4hw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T18:42:40.673Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Teaching Weed Identification at Twenty U.S. Universities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

John L. Lindquist ,
Peter K. Fay  and
James E. Nelson
John L. Lindquist
Affiliation:
Plant Soil Sci. Dep., Mont. State Univ., Bozeman, MT 59717
Peter K. Fay
Affiliation:
Plant Soil Sci. Dep., Mont. State Univ., Bozeman, MT 59717
James E. Nelson
Affiliation:
Plant Soil Sci. Dep., Mont. State Univ., Bozeman, MT 59717
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The methods used to teach weed identification at 20 U.S. universities were obtained for comparison through a telephone survey in December, 1986, and January, 1987. Weed identification is taught as a portion (30%) of the laboratory section in introductory weed science courses. Only five have a separate weed identification course. Field trips frequently are used to teach weed identification. Students must learn from 50 to 125 weed species with some seedling identification. Pressed plant collections of approximately 50 weed species normally are required. Most instructors strongly suggest using live plants and repetition for long-term learning.

Information

Type
Education
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 3 , Issue 1 , March 1989 , pp. 186 - 188
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Anonymous. 1981. Weeds of the North Central States. North Cent. Region. Res. Pub. No. 281. Univ. Ill., Urbana, IL. Bull. 772.Google Scholar
2. Anonymous. 1988. Weed Identification Guide. Vol. 1–3. South. Weed Sci. Soc., 309 W. Clark St., Champaign, IL.Google Scholar
3. Brown, L. G., and Karnok, K. J. 1985. Supplementing crop and weed identification exercises with prepared slide sets. J. Agron. Ed. 14:41–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Chase, R. L. 1984. A simplified key to identification of weedy plant families. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 36:193–195.Google Scholar
5. Cramer, G. L., and Burnside, O. C. 1980. Weeds - identification aids in control. Farm, Ranch, Home Q., Nebr. 27:12–13.Google Scholar
6. Khodayari, K., and Oliver, L. R. 1983. A vegetative seedling key for common monocots. Arkansas Farm Res. 32(4):9.Google Scholar
7. Milford, M. H. 1984. Ideas for success in the classroom. J. Agron. Ed. 13:69–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Parka, S. J. 1976. The identification and utilization of weed biology information. Weed Sci. 24:282–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Stucky, J. M. 1984. Comparison of two methods of identifying weed seedlings. Weed Sci. 32:598–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar