Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-dtkg6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-17T20:15:58.520Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tolerance of Corn with Glyphosate Resistance and the Aryloxyalkanoate Dioxygenase Trait (AAD-1) to 2,4-D Choline and Glyphosate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 March 2017

David C. Ruen ,
Eric F. Scherder ,
Scott C. Ditmarsen ,
Patricia L. Prasifka ,
Jeffrey M. Ellis ,
David M. Simpson ,
Courtney A. Gallup  and
Bradley W. Hopkins
David C. Ruen
Affiliation:
Research Scientists, Dow AgroSciences, 9330 Zionsville Road, Indianapolis, IN 46268
Eric F. Scherder
Affiliation:
Research Scientists, Dow AgroSciences, 9330 Zionsville Road, Indianapolis, IN 46268
Scott C. Ditmarsen
Affiliation:
Research Scientists, Dow AgroSciences, 9330 Zionsville Road, Indianapolis, IN 46268
Patricia L. Prasifka
Affiliation:
Research Scientists, Dow AgroSciences, 9330 Zionsville Road, Indianapolis, IN 46268
Jeffrey M. Ellis
Affiliation:
Research Scientists, Dow AgroSciences, 9330 Zionsville Road, Indianapolis, IN 46268
David M. Simpson
Affiliation:
Research Scientists, Dow AgroSciences, 9330 Zionsville Road, Indianapolis, IN 46268
Courtney A. Gallup
Affiliation:
Research Scientists, Dow AgroSciences, 9330 Zionsville Road, Indianapolis, IN 46268
Bradley W. Hopkins*
Affiliation:
Research Scientists, Dow AgroSciences, 9330 Zionsville Road, Indianapolis, IN 46268
*
*Corresponding author’s E-mail: dcruen@dow.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In 2011, 14 Midwest trial locations evaluated tolerance of an AAD-1 and glyphosate-resistant corn hybrid to a 2,4-D choline+glyphosate premix formulation applied single and sequential POST at V4 and/or V7 corn with and without a PRE application of 2,4-D dimethylamine (DMA). Herbicides were applied at 1X and 2X maximum use rates with 1X rates of 1120 g ae ha−1 for glyphosate and 2,4-D DMA and 1065+1120 g ae ha−1 for the 2,4-D choline+glyphosate premix, respectively. Crop response was greatest 2 d after 2X rate applications, resulting in 4 to 10% visible injury to corn across application timings. No brace root injury or effect on corn grain yield were observed.

En 2011, ensayos en 14 localidades en el medio oeste evaluaron la tolerancia de un híbrido de maíz AAD-1 y uno resistente a glyphosate a formulaciones de premezclas de 2,4-D choline+glyphosate aplicadas POST una vez y secuencialmente en el estadio del maíz V4 y/o V7 con y sin una aplicación PRE de 2,4-D dimethylamine (DMA). Los herbicidas fueron aplicados a 1X y 2X de las dosis máximas de uso con dosis 1X de 1120 g ae ha−1 para glyphosate y 2,4-D DMA y 1065+1120 g ae ha−1 para la premezcla de 2,4-D choline+glyphosate, respectivamente. La respuesta del cultivo fue mayor 2 d después de aplicaciones con dosis 2X, lo que resultó en 4 a 10% de daño visual al maíz en todos los momentos de aplicación. No se observó daño en la raíz ni efectos en el rendimiento del maíz.

Keywords

CornZea mays L.DAS-40278Enlist cornEnlist Duo.
Type
Weed Management-Major Crops
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 31 , Issue 2 , March 2017 , pp. 217 - 224
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor for this paper: Daniel Stephenson, Louisana State University Agricultural Center.

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous (2015a) Enlist® Duo herbicide product label. Indianapolis, IN: Dow AgroSciences LLC. 5 pGoogle Scholar
Anonymous (2015b) Weedar® 64 herbicide product label. Alsip, IL: Nufarm Inc. 7 pGoogle Scholar
Cobb, AH, Reade, JPH (2010) Herbicides and Plant Physiology. 2nd edn. New York: Wiley-Blackwell. Pp 390–391 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunsolus, JL, Curran, WS (1999) Herbicide Mode of Action and Injury Symptoms. North Central Regional Extension Publication No. 377. St. Paul, MN: Communications and Educational Technology Services, University of Minnesota Extension ServiceGoogle Scholar
Kelley, KB, Riechers, DE (2007) Recent developments in auxin biology and new opportunities for auxinic herbicide research. Pest Biochem Physiol 89:1–11 Google Scholar
Monaco, TJ, Weller, SC, Ashton, FM (2002) Weed Science: Principles and Practices. New York: Wiley-Blackwell. Pp 291–310 Google Scholar
Peterson, MA, McMaster, SA, Riechers, DE, Skelton, J, Stahlman, PW (2016) 2,4-D Past, present, and future. Weed Technol 30:303–345 Google Scholar
Rossman, EC, Staniforth, DW (1949) Effects of 2,4-D on inbred lines and a single cross of maize. Plant Physiol 24:60–74 Google Scholar
Rodgers, EG (1952) Brittleness and other responses of corn to 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid. Plant Physiol 27:153–172 Google Scholar
Shea, K, Dow AgroSciences (2014) Determination of nonregulated status of herbicide resistant corn and soybeans. Federal Registry 79:56555–56557 Google Scholar
Wright, TW, Shan, G, Walsh, TA, Lira, JM, Cui, C, Song, P, Zhuan, M, Arnold, NL, Lyn, G, Yau, K, Russel, SM, Cicchillo, RM, Peterson, MA, Simpson, DM, Zhou, N, Pansamuel, J, Zhang, Z (2010) Robust crop resistance to broadleaf and grass herbicides provided by aryloxyalkanoate dioxygenase transgenes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:20240–20245 Google Scholar