Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-wjfd9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T23:31:19.110Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Weed Control in Peanuts (Arachis hypogaea) with Pyridate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

T. Vint Hicks ,
Glenn R. Wehtje  and
John W. Wilcut
T. Vint Hicks
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. Soils, Auburn Univ. and Ala. Agric. Exp. Stn., Auburn Univ., AL 36849
Glenn R. Wehtje
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. Soils, Auburn Univ. and Ala. Agric. Exp. Stn., Auburn Univ., AL 36849
John W. Wilcut
Affiliation:
Dept. of Agron., Univ. of Georgia, Coastal Plain Exp. Stn., Tifton, GA 31793
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Pyridate was evaluated alone and as a component in herbicide systems for weed control and peanut tolerance. Pyridate at 1.0 and 1.5 kg ai ha-1 applied postemergence controlled 79 and 96% of Florida beggarweed, respectively. Pyridate was less effective on sicklepod than 2,4-DB. Peanuts exhibited no visible foliar injury or yield reduction with pyridate at 1.5 kg ha-1, the highest rate evaluated. Comprehensive weed control and maximum yield required that pyridate be tank mixed with 2,4-DB at 0.22 kg ae ha-1.

Keywords

Pyridate, O-(6-chloro-3-phenyl-4-pyridazinyl)-S-octyl carbonthioate2,4-DB, 4-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy) butanoic acidFlorida beggarweed, Desmodium tortuosum (SW.) DC. ♯3 DEDTOsicklepod, Cassia obtusifolia L. ♯ CASOBpeanut, Arachis hypogaea L. ‘Florunner’CASOBDEDTO

Information

Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 4 , Issue 3 , September 1990 , pp. 493 - 495
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Buchanan, G. A., Murray, D. S., and Hauser, E. W. 1983. Weeds and their control in peanuts. p. 206–249 in Pattee, H. E. and Young, C. T., ed. Peanut Science and Technology. Am. Peanut Res. Educ. Soc., Yoakum, TX 77995.Google Scholar
2. Davidson, J. I. Jr., Whitaker, T. B., and Dickens, J. W. 1982. Grading, cleaning, storage, shelling, marketing of peanuts in the United States. p. 571–623 in Pattee, H. E. and Young, C. T., ed. Peanut Science and Technology. Am. Peanut Res. Educ. Soc., Yoakum, TX 77995.Google Scholar
3. Elmore, C. C. 1989. Weed survey–southern states. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 42:408–420.Google Scholar
4. Hauser, E. W., Buchanan, G. A., and Ethredge, J. W. 1975. Competition of Florida beggarweed and sicklepod with peanuts. I. Effects of periods of weed-free maintenance or weed competition. Weed Sci. 23:368–372.Google Scholar
5. Hauser, E. W., Buchanan, G. A., Nichols, R. L., and Patterson, R. M. 1982. Effects of Florida beggarweed (Desmodium tortuosum) and sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) on peanut (Arachis hypogaea) yield. Weed Sci. 30:602–604.Google Scholar
6. Hicks, T. V., and Wehtje, G. R. 1989. Field and laboratory performance of pyridate in respect to peanut weed control. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. Soc. 42:25.Google Scholar
7. MacDonald, G. E., Brecke, B. J., and Colvin, D. L. 1988. Evaluation of pyridate for postemergence weed control in peanuts. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 41:64.Google Scholar
8. Wehtje, G., McGuire, J. A., Walker, R. H., and Patterson, M. G. 1986. Texas panicum (Panicum texanum) control in peanuts (Arachis hypogaea) with paraquat. Weed Sci. 34:308–311.Google Scholar
9. Wilcut, J. W., Wehtje, G. R., Cole, T. A., Hicks, T. V., and McGuire, J. A. 1989. Postemergence weed control systems without dinoseb for peanuts (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Sci. 37:385–391.Google Scholar