Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Sustainable development perspectives of poultry production

  • M. VAARST (a1), S. STEENFELDT (a1) and K. HORSTED (a2)
Abstract

The concept of ‘sustainability’ or ‘sustainable development’ is multi-dimensional, encompassing economic, environmental, social, and institutional governance aspects. The theoretical framework for this article on sustainability in poultry production is built on this multi-dimensional understanding of the concept, acknowledging that it is complex and contested. It is challenging to analyse or discuss the sustainability of one single sector within agriculture, because this sector is part of a global food system, and a systems approach is necessary. This article gives examples of elements which link to one or more of the four aspects, e.g., pollution and antibiotic use, biodiversity (environmental aspects), conditions for farm workers and animal welfare (social aspects), governance of the food chain (institutional aspects), and the development of poultry from a valuable food to a cheap staple food throughout major parts of the world (economic aspects). There are numerous potential pathways for sustainable development of poultry production. Poultry are living, sentient animals that can be well integrated into many different types of urban and rural farming systems, where they benefit from and contribute to such systems and to the livelihood of households around the globe, with special emphasis on women. Furthermore, local production provides potential for production with minimum transport and, concomitantly, minimum usage of fossil fuels. Among the terrestrial animals, poultry has the best conversion rate of feed to human food and the smallest environmental footprint in terms of energy and water use per kg meat or eggs produced.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Sustainable development perspectives of poultry production
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Sustainable development perspectives of poultry production
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Sustainable development perspectives of poultry production
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
Corresponding author: Mette.Vaarst@agrsci.dk
References
Hide All
ALDERS, R.G. and PYM, R.A.E. (2009) Village poultry: still important to millions, eight thousand years after domestication, World's Poultry Science Journal 65 (2): 181-190.
ANONYMOUS (2013a) Livestock, Meat and Eggs in the Netherlands. Annual Survey 2012. Edition 2013. Product Boards for Livestock, Meat and Eggs (PVE). p. 60.
ANONYMOUS (2013b) EU-28. Poultry and product annual. EU-28 Poultry sector to grow again 2013-2014. Required report, public distribution. Pp. 10. http://gain.fas.usda.gov/Recent%20GAIN%20Publications/Poultry%20and%20Products%20Annual_Paris_EU-27_9-16-2013.pdf
BAÉZA, E., CHARTRIN, P., METEAU, K., BORDEAU, T., JUIN, H., LE BIHAN-DUVAL, E., LESSIRE, M. and BERRI, C. (2010) Effect of sex and genotype on carcass composition and nutritional characteristics of chicken meat. British Poultry Science 51: 344-353.
CASTELLINI, C., BOGGIA, A., CORTINA, C., DAL BOSCO, A., PAOLOTTI, L., NOVELLI, E. and MUGNAI, C. (2012) A multicriteria approach for measuring the sustainability of different poultry production systems. Journal of Cleaner Production 37: 192-201.
CHAMBERS, R. and CONVEY, G. (1991) Sustainable rural livelihoods: practical concepts for the 21st century. IDS Discussion Paper 296, pp. 33. https://www.ids.ac.uk/files/Dp296.pdf
DARNHOFER, I., FAIRWEATHER, J. and MOLLER, H. (2010) Assessing a farm's sustainability: insights from resilience thinking. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 8 (3): 186-198.
DE JONG, I.C., ENTING, H., VAN VOORST, A. and BLOKHUIS, H.J. (2005) Do Low-Density Diets Improve Broiler Breeder Welfare During Rearing and Laying? Poultry Science 84 (2): 194-203.
DE VRIES, M. and DE BOER, I.J.M. (2010) Comparing environmental impacts for livestock products: A review of life cycle assessments. Livestock Science 128: 1-11.
DOLBERG, F. (2007) Poultry production for livelihood improvement and poverty alleviation. FAO publication: Poultry in the 21st century. Pp. 26. http://www.fao.org/ag/againfo/home/events/bangkok2007/docs/part3/3_1.pdf.
ENGBERG, R.M. and PETERSEN, J.S. (2001) Poultry production with and without questionable feed additives and ingredients. Proceedings of the 13th European Symposium on Poultry Nutrition, September 30 - October 4 2001, Blankenberge, Belgium, 118-124.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2001) Communication from the Commission. A sustainable Europe for a Better World: A European Union Strategy for Sustainable Development. Brussels 15.5.2001. Pp. 18. http://www.eumonitor.eu/9353000/1/j4nvgs5kjg27kof_j9vvik7m1c3gyxp/vj6ipafsqjxr/f=/9175_01.pdf.
EU (2012) Commission implementing regulation (EU) No 505/2012 of 14 June 2012 amending and correcting Regulation (EC) No 889/2008 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council regulation (EC) No 834/2007 on organic production and labelling of organic products with regard to organic production, labelling and control. Official Journal of the European Union. (L154), 12-19.
EU (2014) Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 836/2014 of 31 July 2014 amending Regulation (EC) No 889/2008 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 on organic production and labelling of organic products with regard to organic production, labelling and control. Official Journal of the European Union. (L230), 10-11.
FAO (2011) World Livestock 2011 - Livestock in food security. Rome, FAO. Pp. 115.
FAO (2012) Sustainability Assessment of Food and Agriculture Systems (SAFA) Guidelines: http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/suistainability/SAFA/SAFA_Guidelines_draft_Jan_2012.pdf (downloaded March 2014), based on the concept of SAFA: http://www.fao.org/nr/sustainability/sustainability-assessments-safa/en/.
FAO (2013) Investigating the structures of agricultural trade industry in developing countries. FAO Commodity and Trade policy research working paper No. 38. Pp. 41.http://www.fao.org/3/a-ar706e.pdf.
FAO (2015) Coping with Climate Change – the roles of genetic resources for food and agriculture. Commision on genetic resources for food and agriculture. Pp. 110. Downloaded from http://www.fao.org/3/a-i3866e.pdf (downloaded 9th Feb 2015 and I just tested it 5th Oct. 2015).
GERBENS-LEENES, P.W., MEKONNEN, M.M. and HOEKSTRA, A.Y. (2013) The water footprint of poultry, pork and beef: A comparative study in different countries and production systems. Water Resources and Industry 1-2: 25-36.
GERBER, P.J. and STEINFELD, H. (2008) Global environmental consequences of the livestock sector's growth. Outlook on Agriculture 37 (1): 7-13.
GODLEY, A. (2007) The chicken, the Factory Farm and the Supermarket: the Emergence of the Modern Poultry Industry in Britain. Working Paper Series, Business School, University of Reading, pp. 35.
HERMANSEN, J.E., HORSTED, K. and KONGSTED, A.G. (2014) Meat production in organic farming, in: Dikeman, M. and Devine, C. (Eds) Encyclopedia of Meat Sciences 2e, Vol 2, pp. 199-203 (Oxford: Elsevier).
HIN, K.J., WAGENAAR, J.-P., VAN DER ZIJPP, A. and VAN DER WEIJDEN, W.J. (2013) Chicken: the most complex piece of meat - market mechanisms, chain relations and integrated sustainability [Kip: het meest complexe stukje vlees - marktmechanismen, ketenrelaties en integrale duurzaamheid. In Dutch]. Pp. 34. The Scientific Council for Integrated Sustainable Agriculture and Food, www.ridlv.nl.
HORSTED, K. and HERMANSEN, J.E. (2007) Whole wheat versus mixed layer diet as supplementary feed to layers foraging a sequence of different forage crops. Animal 1: 575-585
LE BOUQUIN, S. (2014) Air quality in poultry hatcheries. Proceedings of the XIVth European Poultry Conference, June 24th-27th, 2014, Stavanger, abstract.
LEIBLEIN, J.H., OTTE, J., ROLAND-HOLST, D., PFEIFFER, D.U., MAGALHAES, R.S., RUSHTON, H., GRAHAM, J.P. and SILBERGELD, E.K. (2009) Industrial Food Animal Production and Global Health: exploring the Ecosystems and Economics if Avian Influenza. EcoHealth 6: 58-70. http://www.globalenvironmentalhealth.com/uploads/2/1/8/2/21821416/food_animal_production_and_global_health_risks.pdf.
LEINONEN, I., WILLIAMS, A.G., WISEMAN, J., GUY, J. and KYRIAZAKIS, I. (2012a) Predicting the environmental impact of chicken systems in the UK through a life cycle assessment: broiler production systems. Poultry Science 91: 8-25.
LEINONEN, I., WILLIAMS, A.G., WISEMAN, J., GUY, J. and KYRIAZAKIS, I. (2012b) Predicting the environmental impact of chicken systems in the UK through a life cycle assessment: egg production systems. Poultry Science 91: 26-40.
LEINONEN, I., WILLIAMS, A.G., WALLER, A.H. and KYRIAZAKIS, I. (2013) Comparing the environmental impact of alternative protein crops in poultry diets: the consequences of uncertainty. Agricultural systems 121: 33-42.
MAGDELAINE, P., RIFFARD, C. and BERLIER, C. (2010) Comparative survey of the organic poultry production in the European Union. Proceedings of the XIIIth European Poultry Conference, pp. 9.
MCMICHAEL, A.J., POWLES, J.D., BUTLER, C.D. and UAUY, R. (2007) Food, livestock production, energy, climate change and health. The Lancet 370: 1253-1263.
NIELSEN, B.L., THOMSEN, M.G., SORENSEN, P. and YOUNG, J.F. (2003) Feed and strain effects on the use of outdoor areas by broilers. British Poultry Science 44: 161-169.
NIELSEN, B.L., THODBERG, K., MALMKVIST, J. and STEENFELDT, S. (2011) Proportion of insoluble fibre in the diet affects behaviour and hunger in broiler breeders growing at similar rates. Animal 5 (8): 1247-1258.
PEDERSEN, H.L., OLSEN, A., HORSTED, K., KORSGAARD, M. and PEDERSEN, B. (2004) Combined production of broilers and fruits. ECO-FRU-VIT. 11th International Conference on cultivation technique and phytopathological problems in organic fruit growing, Weinsberg: 131-136.
QUANDT, S.A., ARGURY-QUANDT, A.E., LAWLOR, E.J., CARRILLO, L., MARÍN, A.J., GRZYWACZ, J.G. and ARCURY, T.A. (2013) 3-D Jobs and Health Disparities: The Health Implications of Latino Chicken Catchers’ Working Conditions. American Journal of Industrial Medicine 56: 206-215.
RAUW, W.M., KANIS, E., NOORDHUZEN-STASSEN, E.N. and GROMMERS, F.J. (1998) . Undesirable side effects of selection for high production efficiency in farm animals: a review. Livestock Production Science 56: 15-33.
ROCKSTRÖM, J., STEFFEN, W., NOONE, K., PERSSON, Å., CHAPIN III, F.S., LAMBIN, E., LENTON, T.M., SCHEFFER, M., FOLKE, C., SCHELLNHUBER, H., NYKVIST, B., DE WIT, C.A., HUGHES, T., VAN DER LEEUW, S., RODHE, H., SÖRLIN, S., SNYDER, P.K., COSTANZA, R., SVEDIN, U., FALKENMARK, M., KARLBERG, L., CORELL, R.W., FABRY, V.J., HANSEN, J., WALKER, B., LIVERMAN, D., RICHARDSON, K., CRUTZEN, P. and FOLEY, J. (2009) Planetary boundaries: exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecology and Society 14 (2): 32. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss2/art32/.
SPANGENBERG, J. (2004) Sustainability beyond Environmentalism: the missing dimensions. GoSD Working Paper No. 2, May 2004, pp. 28.
STEENFELDT, S., AFROSE, S., HAMMERSHØJ, M. and HORSTED, K. (2013) How to safeguard adequate nutrition in organic poultry production? Proceedings of the 19th European Symposium on Poultry Nutrition, Page 60-66. Potsdam, Germany, August 26-29, 2013.
STEINFELD, H., GERBER, P., WASSENAAR, T., CASTEL, V., ROSALES, M. and DE HAAN, C. (2006) Livestock's long shadow - environmental issues and options. FAO, Rome, Italy, pp. 390.
SUNDRUM, A. (2005) Possibilities and limitations of protein supply in organic poultry and pig production. Report, EU project no. SSPE-CT-2004-502397, pp. 107. http://www.organic-revision.org/pub/Final_Report_EC_Revision.pdf.
SÆBJØRNSEN, C. (2013) Cultivating the food conscience: A case study of the Oslo egg shed. Agroecology Master Thesis, 30 ECTS. Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, pp.57. http://brage.bibsys.no/xmlui/handle/11250/189662.
THOMPSON, P.B. (2007) Agricultural sustainability: what it is and what it is not. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 5 (1): 5-16.
TITZE, P., RODE, J., MARI, F. and LANGE, P. (2007) No more chicken, please. How a strong grassroot movement in Cameroon is successfully resisting damaging chicken imports from Europe, which are ruining small farmers all over West Africa. EED, ACDIC, ICCO, APRODEV. Revised campaign brochure ‘Poulets congelés’ by ACDIC from Cameroon. Pp. 20. http://aprodev.eu/files/Trade/071203_chicken_e_final.pdf.
VALENTIN, A. and SPANGENBERG, J. (2000) A guide to community sustainability indicator. Environmental Impact Assessment Reviews 20: 381-392.
VERRIER, E., TIXIER-BOICHARD, M., BERNIGAUD, B. and NAVES, M. (2005) Conservation and value of local livestock breeds: usefulness of niche products and/or adaptation to specific environments. Animal Genetics Resources Information 36: 21-31.
WILLIAMS, A.G., AUDSLEY, E. and SANDARS, D.L. (2009) A Lifecycle Approach to Reducing the Environmental Impacts of Poultry Production. Proceedings and Abstracts, 17th European Symposium on Poultry Nutrition, S4.1, pp. 7.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

World's Poultry Science Journal
  • ISSN: 0043-9339
  • EISSN: 1743-4777
  • URL: /core/journals/world-s-poultry-science-journal
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed