Hostname: page-component-754f97d4cd-89jg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-21T22:11:26.825Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Postglacial vegetation dynamics at high elevation from Fairy Lake in the northern Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem, Montana, USA – Corrigendum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2019

James V. Benes ,
Virginia Iglesias  and
Cathy Whitlock
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Information

Type
Corrigendum
Information
Quaternary Research , Volume 92 , Issue 2 , September 2019 , pp. 606 - 607
Copyright
Copyright © University of Washington. Published by Cambridge University Press, 2019 

In the original publication of this article (Benes et al.), the captions for Figures 2 and 3 were inadvertently switched. The figure captions should read as follows:

Figure 2.

Age-depth model for Fairy Lake. 95% confidence intervals are shown in gray. The distributions of the calibrated ages employed in the development of the chronology are shown in purple and orange (samples submitted for 14C analysis and published ages of tephra deposition, respectively). (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

Figure 3.

Lithology, red-value intensity, magnetic susceptibility (SI), carbonate content (%), and organic matter (%) from Fairy Lake. Lithological units 1 and 2 are shown. The black rectangles represent 14C dates. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

The authors apologize for this error.

References

Benes, J., Iglesias, V., & Whitlock, C. Postglacial vegetation dynamics at high elevation from Fairy Lake in the northern Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem, Montana, USA. Quaternary Research, 1–16. doi:10.1017/qua.2019.9. Published online 05 April 2019.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 2. Age-depth model for Fairy Lake. 95% confidence intervals are shown in gray. The distributions of the calibrated ages employed in the development of the chronology are shown in purple and orange (samples submitted for 14C analysis and published ages of tephra deposition, respectively). (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

Figure 1

Figure 3. Lithology, red-value intensity, magnetic susceptibility (SI), carbonate content (%), and organic matter (%) from Fairy Lake. Lithological units 1 and 2 are shown. The black rectangles represent 14C dates. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)