Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-kl59c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-19T13:15:54.624Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Legitimacy and the UN Security Council Agenda

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 March 2017

Brian Frederking
Affiliation:
McKendree University
Christopher Patane
Affiliation:
University of Missouri

Abstract

Is the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) a legitimate organization? Do the veto powers legitimately pursue international security, or do they protect their narrow national interests? One way to evaluate the legitimacy of the UNSC is through its agenda. Does it address the most significant conflicts in world politics? Or is it influenced by the national interests of the veto powers? This article addresses these questions with a dataset that includes the number of UNSC meetings held and resolutions passed on 40 conflicts from 1991 to 2013. This analysis provides evidence for the legitimacy of the UNSC—conflicts with more refugees and more deaths are significantly more likely to be on the agenda. The analysis does not support critics of the UNSC—the national interests of the veto powers, measured as arms sales to and trade with the conflict participants, do not significantly alter the UNSC agenda.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Supplementary material: PDF

Frederking and Patane supplementary material

Tables S1-S2

Download Frederking and Patane supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 46.7 KB