Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-tq7bh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-14T19:02:22.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dietary soya protein improves intra-myocardial lipid deposition and altered glucose metabolism in a hypertensive, dyslipidaemic, insulin-resistant rat model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2017

María E. Oliva
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry, School of Biochemistry, University of Litoral, Ciudad Universitaria, Paraje El Pozo, CC 242, 3000 Santa Fe, Argentina Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas (CONICET), Santa Fe, C1425FQB CABA, Argentina
Agustina Creus
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry, School of Biochemistry, University of Litoral, Ciudad Universitaria, Paraje El Pozo, CC 242, 3000 Santa Fe, Argentina Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas (CONICET), Santa Fe, C1425FQB CABA, Argentina
María R. Ferreira
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry, School of Biochemistry, University of Litoral, Ciudad Universitaria, Paraje El Pozo, CC 242, 3000 Santa Fe, Argentina Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas (CONICET), Santa Fe, C1425FQB CABA, Argentina
Adriana Chicco
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry, School of Biochemistry, University of Litoral, Ciudad Universitaria, Paraje El Pozo, CC 242, 3000 Santa Fe, Argentina Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas (CONICET), Santa Fe, C1425FQB CABA, Argentina
Yolanda B. Lombardo*
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry, School of Biochemistry, University of Litoral, Ciudad Universitaria, Paraje El Pozo, CC 242, 3000 Santa Fe, Argentina Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas (CONICET), Santa Fe, C1425FQB CABA, Argentina
*
* Corresponding author: Y. B. Lombardo, fax +54 342 4575 221, email ylombard@fbcb.unl.edu.ar
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study investigates the effects of replacing dietary casein by soya protein on the underlying mechanisms involved in the impaired metabolic fate of glucose and lipid metabolisms in the heart of dyslipidaemic rats chronically fed (8 months) a sucrose-rich (62·5 %) diet (SRD). To test this hypothesis, Wistar rats were fed an SRD for 4 months. From months 4 to 8, half the animals continued with the SRD and the other half were fed an SRD in which casein was substituted by soya. The control group received a diet with maize starch as the carbohydrate source. Compared with the SRD-fed group, the following results were obtained. First, soya protein significantly (P<0·001) reduced the plasma NEFA levels and normalised dyslipidaemia and glucose homoeostasis, improving insulin resistance. The protein levels of fatty acid translocase at basal state and under insulin stimulation and the protein levels and activity of muscle-type carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1 were normalised. Second, a significant (P<0·001) reduction of TAG, long-chain acyl CoA and diacylglycerol levels was observed in the heart muscle. Third, soya protein significantly increased (P<0·01) GLUT4 protein level under insulin stimulation and normalised glucose phosphorylation and oxidation. A reduction of phosphorylated AMP protein kinase protein level was recorded without changes in uncoupling protein 2 and PPARα. Fourth, hydroxyproline concentration decreased in the left ventricle and hypertension was normalised. The new information provided shows the beneficial effects of soya protein upon the altered pathways of glucose and lipid metabolism in the heart muscle of this rat model.

Information

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2017 
Figure 0

Table 1 Composition of the experimental diets (based on the modified American Institute of Nutrition (AIN)-93 diet)

Figure 1

Table 2 Body weight, energy intake, total and relative heart and left ventricle weights, plasma metabolite and insulin levels in rats fed a control diet (CD), a sucrose-rich diet (SRD) or an SRD with soya protein (SRD-S)† (Mean values with their standard errors; n 6)

Figure 2

Fig. 1 Time course of systolic and diastolic blood pressure and heart rate throughout the experimental period in rats fed a control diet (CD, ), a sucrose-rich diet (SRD, ) or an SRD with soya protein (SRD-S, ). Values are means (six animals per group), with their standard errors represented by vertical bars. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure: mean values were significantly different – *CD v. SRD rats; † SRD v. SRD-S rats (P<0·05) at each time point. Heart rate: mean values were significantly different – * CD v. SRD (P<0·05) and ** CD v. SRD rats (P<0·01); † SRD v. SRD-S (P<0·05) and †† SRD v. SRD-S rats (P<0·01) at each time point.

Figure 3

Table 3 Metabolite and enzyme activities in heart muscle in rats fed a control diet (CD), a sucrose-rich diet (SRD) or an SRD with soya protein (SRD-S) at the end of experimental period† (Mean values with their standard errors; n 6)

Figure 4

Fig. 2 Heart protein levels of muscle-type carnitine palmitoyl transferase 1 (M-CPT1), PPARα and uncoupling protein 2 (UCP2) in rats fed a control diet (CD), a sucrose-rich diet (SRD) or an SRD with soya protein (SRD-S). (a): Top panel: a representative immunoblot of M-CPT1 of heart muscle from CD, SRD or SRD-S. Molecular marker is shown on the right. Lane 1, CD; lane 2, SRD; lane 3, SRD-S. Bottom panel: densitometric immunoblot analysis of M-CPT1 of heart muscle from CD, SRD or SRD-S. (b) Top panel: a representative immunoblot of PPARα of heart muscle from CD, SRD or SRD-S. Molecular marker is shown on the right. Lane 1, CD; lane 2, SRD; lane 3, SRD-S. Bottom panel: densitometric immunoblot analysis of PPARα of heart muscle from CD, SRD or SRD-S. (c) Top panel: a representative immunoblot of UCP2 of heart muscle from CD, SRD or SRD-S. Molecular marker is shown on the right. Lane 1, CD; lane 2, SRD; lane 3, SRD-S. Bottom panel: densitometric immunoblot analysis of UCP2 of heart muscle from CD, SRD or SRD-S. Values are means (six animals per group), with their standard errors represented by vertical bars and expressed as percentage relative to the CD. (a) *** (P<0·001) SRD v. CD and SRD-S; (b) ** (P<0·01) SRD and SRD-S v. CD.

Figure 5

Fig. 3 Heart muscle protein levels of GLUT4 at the beginning (0 min) and under the insulin stimulation at the end (120 min) of the clamp studies in rats fed a control diet (CD), a sucrose-rich diet (SRD) or an SRD with soya protein (SRD-S). Top panel: a representative immunoblot of GLUT4 heart muscle from CD, SRD or SRD-S. Molecular marker is shown on the right. Lane 1, CD 0 min; lane 2, CD 120 min; lane 3, SRD 0 min; lane 4, SRD 120 min; lane 5, SRD-S 0 min; lane 6, SRD-S 120 min. Bottom panel: densitometric immunoblot analysis of GLUT4 heart muscle from CD, SRD or SRD-S at the beginning (0 min, □) and at the end (120 min, ■) of clamp studies. Values are means (six animals per group), with their standard errors represented by vertical bars and expressed as percentage relative to the CD at 0 min of the clamp. a,b Mean values unlike letters were significantly different compared at the beginning and the end of the clamp in each experimental group (P<0·01). * Statistically significant difference (P<0·05) SRD-S v. CD rats at 120 min of the clamp and † (P<0·01) SRD v. CD and SRD-S rats at 120 min of the clamp.

Figure 6

Fig. 4 Heart muscle protein levels of fatty acid translocase (FAT/CD36) at the beginning (0 min) and under the insulin stimulation at the end (120 min) of the clamp studies in rats fed a control diet (CD), a sucrose-rich diet (SRD) or an SRD with soya protein (SRD-S). Top panel: a representative immunoblot of heart FAT/CD36 of rats fed CD, SRD and SRD-S. Molecular marker is shown on the right. Lane 1, CD 0 min; lane 2, CD 120 min; lane 3, SRD 0 min; lane 4, SRD 120 min; lane 5, SRD-S 0 min; lane 6, SRD-S 120 min. Bottom panel: densitometric immunoblot analysis of FAT/CD36 heart muscle from CD, SRD or SRD-S at the beginning (0 min, □) and at the end (120 min, ■) of clamp studies. Values are means (six animals per group), with their standard errors represented by vertical bars and expressed as percentage relative to the CD at 0 min of the clamp. a,b Mean values unlike letters were significantly different compared at the beginning and the end of the clamp in each experimental group (P<0·01). * Statistically significant difference (P<0·01) SRD v. CD and SRD-S rats at 0 min of the clamp.

Figure 7

Fig. 5 (a) Heart protein levels of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) and phosphorylated AMP-activated protein kinase (pAMPK) (Thr172) in rats fed a control diet (CD), a sucrose-rich diet (SRD) or an SRD with soya protein (SRD-S). (a): Top panel: a representative immunoblot of AMPK of heart muscle from CD, SRD or SRD-S. Molecular marker is shown on the right. Lane 1, CD; lane 2, SRD; lane 3, SRD-S. Bottom panel: densitometric immunoblot analysis of AMPK of heart muscle from CD, SRD or SRD-S. (b): Top panel: a representative immunoblot of pAMPK (Thr172). Molecular marker is shown on the right. Lane 1, CD; lane 2, SRD; lane 3, SRD-S. Bottom panel: densitometric immunoblot analysis of pAMPK of heart muscle from CD, SRD or SRD-S. Values are means (six animals per group), with their standard errors represented by vertical bars and expressed as percentage relative to the control diet. *** (P<0·001). (c) pAMPK:AMPK ratio in rats fed a CD, SRD or SRD-S. Values are means (six animals per group), with their standard errors represented by vertical bars. *** (P<0·001) SRD v. CD and SRD-S.