Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-76mfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-19T10:27:59.642Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Assessment of the mechanisms exerting glucose-lowering effects of dried peas in glucose-intolerant rats

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 August 2012

Kevin A. Whitlock
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, CanadaT6G 2R3
Lisa Kozicky
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, CanadaT6G 2R3
Alena Jin
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, CanadaT6G 2R3
Homun Yee
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, CanadaT6G 2R3
Christine Ha
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, CanadaT6G 2R3
Jill Morris
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, CanadaT6G 2R3
Catherine J. Field
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, CanadaT6G 2R3
Rhonda C. Bell
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, CanadaT6G 2R3
Jocelyn A. Ozga
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, CanadaT6G 2R3
Catherine B. Chan*
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, CanadaT6G 2R3 Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, CanadaT6G 2R3
*
*Corresponding author: Dr C. B. Chan, fax +1 780 492 8915, email cbchan@ualberta.ca
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The present study compared the effects of feeding uncooked pea fractions (embryo v. seed coat) on glucose homeostasis in glucose-intolerant rats and examined potential mechanisms influencing glucose homeostasis. Rats were made glucose intolerant by high-fat feeding, after which diets containing both high-fat and pea fractions were fed for 4 weeks. Rats fed diets containing uncooked pea seed coats low (non-coloured seed coat; NSC) or high (coloured seed coat; CSC) in proanthocyanidins but not embryos had improved oral glucose tolerance (P < 0·05). NSC also lowered fasting and glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (P < 0·05), decreased β-cell mass by 50 % (P < 0·05) and lowered levels of malondialdehyde, a marker of oxidative stress. Furthermore, NSC decreased the mucosal thickness of the colon by 25 % (P < 0·05), which might affect fibre fermentation and other gut functions. Small but statistically significant (P < 0·05) effects consistent with enhanced glucose transport or metabolism were observed in the skeletal muscle of rats fed NSC or CSC, for example, increased levels of AMP-dependent kinase or akt. We conclude that pea seed coats are the fraction exerting beneficial effects on glucose tolerance. Most of the changes were small in amplitude, suggesting that additive effects on multiple tissues may be important. NSC content appeared to have the most beneficial effects in improving glucose homeostasis but our ability to detect the effect of flavonoids may have been limited by their low concentration in the diet.

Information

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2012
Figure 0

Table 1 Diet composition (g/kg)*

Figure 1

Table 2 Protein and fibre analysis of whole seeds, seed coats and embryos of pea cultivars ‘Courier’ and ‘Canstar’(Mean values with their standard errors of three replicates)

Figure 2

Table 3 Metabolic profile of rats fed diets containing pea components(Mean values with their standard errors of eight replicates)

Figure 3

Fig. 1 Effects of feeding pea fractions on oral glucose tolerance in rats. Effect of 3 weeks () and 7 weeks () of feeding a 40 % (w/w) fat diet (high-fat diet; HFD) on oral glucose tolerance (a) and insulin secretion (b) in response to administration of 1 g/kg oral glucose. (), Baseline. Values are means, with standard errors represented by vertical bars. *Mean value was significantly different from that at baseline (P < 0·05). (c) Blood glucose and (d) plasma insulin responses to 1 g/kg oral glucose in rats on the HFD for 3 weeks, then continued on the HFD (; n 16) or switched to the HFD plus coloured seed coats (CSC; ; n 16), non-coloured seed coats (NSC; ; n 16) or embryos (EMB; ; n 8) for 4 weeks. Values are means, with standard errors represented by vertical bars. Mean value was significantly different from that of the HFD group: *P < 0·05, **P < 0·01. (e, f) Incremental areas under the curve (AUC) for the glucose tolerance and insulin secretion data shown in (c) and (d). Values are means, with standard errors represented by vertical bars. *Mean value was significantly different from that of the HFD group (P < 0·05). (g) Calculation of insulin sensitivity using the homeostasis model of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). Values are means, with standard errors represented by vertical bars. *Mean value was significantly different from that of the HFD group (P < 0·05). †Mean value was significantly different from that of the CSC group (P < 0·05).

Figure 4

Fig. 2 Effects of feeding pea seed coats on GLUT4 levels in muscle measured by immunoblotting. GLUT4 protein relative to glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) in rats fed a high-fat diet alone (control; n 8) or supplemented with coloured seed coats (n 8) or non-coloured seed coats (n 8) in (a) soleus and (b) epitrochlearis muscle lysates. Values are means, with standard errors represented by vertical bars. Insets show representative blots.

Figure 5

Table 4 Summary of immunoblotting results in skeletal muscle and liver after insulin stimulation(Mean values with their standard errors of eight replicates)

Figure 6

Fig. 3 Morphology of pancreatic islets. The percentage of total pancreatic area occupied by cells immunostaining for (a) insulin and (b) glucagon was quantified. Values are means (n 8 for all groups), with standard errors represented by vertical bars. *Mean value was significantly different from that of the control group fed the high-fat diet (P < 0·05). (c) Representative photomicrographs. Insulin immunostaining is highlighted by the circles around each islet. CSC, coloured seed coat diet; NSC, non-coloured seed coat diet; EMB, embryo diet.

Figure 7

Fig. 4 Assessment of oxidative stress in the islets by dual immunostaining for insulin and malondialdehyde (MDA) (a) and insulin and nitrotyrosine (NT) (b). MDA co-localised with cells labelled for insulin in all groups, and with cells not labelled for insulin only in the non-coloured seed coat (NSC) group ( → ). NT staining was limited to cells not staining for insulin in all groups. LFD, low-fat diet; HFD, high-fat diet; CSC, coloured seed coat diet; EMB, embryo diet.

Figure 8

Fig. 5 Effects of feeding pea fractions on gut morphology. (a) Thickness of the colonic mucosa. (b) Villus height in the jejunum. Values are means (n 8 for all groups), with standard errors represented by vertical bars. *Mean value was significantly reduced compared with the other groups (P < 0·05). No effects of pea fractions on villus height in the jejunum were detected. CSC, coloured seed coat diet; NSC, non-coloured seed coat diet; EMB, embryo diet.