Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-7262s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-15T08:39:17.765Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Burnout and psychiatric morbidity among doctors in the UK: A systematic literature review of prevalence and associated factors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Udemezue O. Imo*
Affiliation:
Royal Oldham Hospital, Oldham, UK
*
Correspondence to Udemezue O. Imo (uimo@nhs.net)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Aims and method

To systematically review the prevalence and associated factors of burnout and stress-related psychiatric disorders among UK doctors. An extensive search was conducted of PubMed, EBSCOhost and British medical journals for studies published over a 20-year span measuring the prevalence of psychiatric morbidity (using the General Health Questionnaire) and burnout (using the Maslach Burnout Inventory).

Results

Prevalence of psychiatric morbidity ranged from 17 to 52%. Burnout scores for emotional exhaustion ranged from 31 to 54.3%, depersonalisation 17.4 to 44.5% and low personal accomplishment 6 to 39.6%. General practitioners and consultants had the highest scores. Factors significantly associated with increase in the prevalence of burnout and psychiatric morbidity include low job satisfaction, overload, increased hours worked and neuroticism.

Clinical implications

The results indicate a worryingly high rate of burnout and psychiatric morbidity among UK doctors, which could have a huge negative impact on healthcare provision in general. Factors at personal and organisational levels contribute to burnout and psychiatric morbidity, and so efforts made to counter these problems should target both levels.

Information

Type
Review Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an open-access article published by the Royal College of Psychiatrists and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 The Author
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Flowchart of the study selection process.

Figure 1

Table 1 Units of analysis included in this review

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.