Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-7262s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-13T16:00:46.142Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Large-Scale Patterns in the Chemical Composition of Mississippian Pottery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Vincas P. Steponaitis ,
M. James Blackman  and
Hector Neff
Vincas P. Steponaitis
Affiliation:
Research Laboratories of Anthropology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3120
M. James Blackman
Affiliation:
Conservation Analytical Laboratory, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20560
Hector Neff
Affiliation:
Research Reactor Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Neutron activation analysis of Mississippian sherds from 21 regions across the Southeast has revealed the existence of distinctive chemical groups that are associated with four large geographical areas. One such group is associated with sites along the Mississippi River and its western tributaries, a second is associated with sites on the Appalachian Rim in Tennessee, a third is associated with sites on the Piedmont and associated drainages, and a fourth is associated with sites in Alabama. This pattern reflects the existence of several large, clay-mineral provinces in the Southeast that now can be recognized as sources in future studies of long-distance exchange.

El análisis de activación de neutrones de tiestos Misisipí procedentes de 21 regiones a lo largo del sureste de Estados Unidos ha revelado la existencia de grupos químicos distintos asociados con cuatro áreas geográficas. Uno grupo se asocia con sitios a lo largo del Río Misisipí y sus tributarios occidentales; un segundo grupo se asocia con sitios en el Borde de Appalachia en Tennessee; un tercero se asocia con sitios en el piedemonte y drenajes asociados; y un cuarto se asocia con sitios en Alabama. Este patrón refleja la existencia de varias provincias grandes de arcillas-minerales en el Sureste que hoy pueden reconocerse como fuentes enfuturos análisis de intercambio a larga distancia.

Information

Type
Reports
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 61 , Issue 3 , July 1996 , pp. 555 - 572
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

References Cited

Bicker, A. R., Jr. 1969 Geologic Map of Mississippi. 1 sheet, 1 : 500,000. Mississippi Geological Survey, Jackson.Google Scholar
Bieber, A. M., Jr., Brooks, D. W., Harbottle, G., and Sayre, E. V 1976 Application of Multivariate Techniques to Analytical Data on Aegean Ceramics. Archaeometry 18 : 59–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, R. L., and Canouts, V 1993 Archaeometry. In The Development of Southeastern Archaeology, edited by Johnson, J. K., pp. 160–183. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.Google Scholar
Bishop, R. L., Rands, R. L., and Holley, G. 1982 Ceramic Compositional Analysis in Archaeological Analysis. In Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, vol. 5, edited by Schiffer, M. B., pp. 275–330. Academic Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackman, M. J. 1984 Provenance Studies of Middle Eastern Obsidian from Sites in Highland Iran. In Archaeological Chemistry III, edited by Lambert, J. B., pp. 19–50. American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackman, M. J. 1986 Precision in Routine I.N.A.A. over a Two Year Period at the NBSR. In NBS Technical Note 1231, edited by Shorten, F., pp. 122–126. National Bureau of Standards, Gaithersburg, Maryland.Google Scholar
Blackman, M. J., Mery, S., and Wright, R. P. 1989 Production and Exchange of Ceramics on the Oman Peninsula from the Perspective of Hili. Journal of Field Archaeology 16 : 61–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackman, M. J., Mery, S., and Wright, R. P. Archaeology of the Natchez Bluffs. Manuscript on file, Research Laboratories of Anthropology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Brown, I. W, and Fuller, R. S. (editors) 1993 Bottle Creek Research : Working Papers on the Bottle Creek Site (lBa2), Baldwin County, Alabama. Journal of Alabama Archaeology 39(1-2).Google Scholar
Caldwell, J. R. 1955 Investigations at Rood's Landing, Stewart County, Georgia. Early Georgia 2(1).Google Scholar
Clarke, O. M., Jr. 1963 Residual Clays of the Piedmont Province in Alabama. Circular 20-A. Geological Survey of Alabama, Tuscaloosa.Google Scholar
Clarke, O. M., Jr. 1966 Clay and Shale of Northwestern Alabama. Circular 20-B. Geological Survey of Alabama, Tuscaloosa.Google Scholar
Clarke, O. M., Jr. 1968a Clay and Shale of Northeastern Alabama. Circular 20-C. Geological Survey of Alabama, Tuscaloosa.Google Scholar
Clarke, O. M., Jr. 1968b Clays of Southeastern Alabama. Circular 20-D. Geological Survey of Alabama, Tuscaloosa.Google Scholar
Clarke, O. M., Jr. 1970 Clays of Southwestern Alabama. Circular 20-E. Geological Survey of Alabama, Tuscaloosa.Google Scholar
Cogswell, J., Neff, H., and Glascock, M. D. 1993 An Analysis of Shell-Tempered Pottery Replicates : Implications for Provenience Studies. Paper presented at the 58th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, St. Louis.Google Scholar
Cotter, J. L. 1951 Stratigraphic and Area Tests at the Emerald and Anna Mound Sites. American Antiquity 17 : 18–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curren, C. 1992 Archeology in the Mauvila Chiefdom. Mobile Historic Development Commission, Mobile, Alabama.Google Scholar
Curren, C. 1938 Physiography of Eastern United States. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Fenneman, N. M., and Johnson, D. W. 1946 Physical Divisions of the United States. 1 sheet, 1 : 7,000,000. U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia.Google Scholar
Glascock, M. D. 1992 Characterization of Archaeological Ceramics at MURR by Neutron Activation Analysis and Multivariate Statistics. In Chemical Characterization of Ceramic Pastes in Archaeology, edited by Neff, H., pp. 11–26. Monographs in World Archaeology 7. Prehistory Press, Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Griffin, G. M. 1962 Regional Clay Mineral Facies—Products of Weathering Intensity and Current Distribution in the Northeastern Gulf of Mexico. Geological Society of America Bulletin 73 : 737–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grim, R. E. 1936 The Eocene Sediments of Mississippi. Bulletin 30. Mississippi State Geological Survey, University.Google Scholar
Grim, R. E. 1968 Clay Mineralogy. 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Hally, D. J. 1980 Archaeological Investigations of the Little Egypt Site (9Mul02), Murray County, Georgia, 1969 Season. Laboratory of Archaeology Report 18. University of Georgia, Athens.Google Scholar
Harbottle, G. 1976 Activation Analysis in Archaeology. In Radiochemistry, vol. 3, edited by A, G. W.. Newton, pp. 33–72. Chemical Society, London.Google Scholar
Harbottle, G. 1982 Chemical Characterization in Archaeology. In Contexts for Prehistoric Exchange, edited by Ericson, J. E. and Earle, T.K. pp. 13–51. Academic Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardeman, W. D., Miller, R. A., and Swingle, G. D. 1966 Geologic Map of Tennessee. 4 sheets, 1 : 250,000. Tennessee Division of Geology, Nashville.Google Scholar
Harrington, M. R. 1922 Cherokee and Earlier Remains on the Upper Tennessee River. Museum of the American Indian, Indian Notes and Monographs 24. Heye Foundation, New York.Google Scholar
Hathaway, J. C. 1972 Regional Clay Mineral Facies in Estuaries and Continental Margin of the United States East Coast. Memoir 133. In Environmental Framework of Coastal Plain Estuaries, edited by Nelson, B. W., pp. 293–316. Geological Society of America, Boulder, Colorado.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, M. P. 1970 Archaeological and Historical Assessment of the Red River Basin in Arkansas. In Archeological and Historical Resources of the Red River Basin, edited by Davis, H. A., pp. 135–194. Research Series 1. Arkansas Archeological Survey, Fayetteville.Google Scholar
Holmes, W. H. 1883 Art in Shell of the Ancient Americans. Second Annual Report of the Bureau of Ethnology, pp. 179–305. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Hunt, C. B. 1979 Surfwial Geology. 1 sheet, 1 : 7,500,000. National Atlas Map Series. U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia.Google Scholar
Hunt, C. B. Archaeological Site near Little Rock, Arkansas. Arkansas Archeological Survey, Fayetteville. Report submitted to the Federal Aviation Administration.Google Scholar
Johnson, J. K. 1994 Prehistoric Exchange in the Southeast. In Prehistoric Exchange Systems in North America, edited by Baugh, T. G. and Ericson, J.E. pp. 99–125. Plenum Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, V C. 1965 Mineralogy and Cation Exchange Capacity of Sediments from Selected Streams. Geological Survey Professional Paper 433-D. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinney, D. M. 1966 Geology. 1 sheet, 1 : 7,500,000. National Atlas Map Series. U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia. Reprinted 1970 in The National Atlas of the United States of America, pp. 74–75. U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Kutruff, J. T., and Kutruff, C. 1992 Textile Production and Use as Revealed in Fabric Impressed Pottery from Mound Bottom (40Ch8), Tennessee. Mississippi Archaeology 27(2) : 1–27.Google Scholar
Lafferty, R. H., III 1994 Prehistoric Exchange in the Lower Mississippi Valley. In Prehistoric Exchange Systems in North America, edited by Baugh, T. G. and Ericson, J.E. pp. 177–213. Plenum Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maggetti, M. 1982 Phase Analysis and Its Significance for Technology and Origin. In Archaeological Ceramics, edited by Olin, J. S. and Franklin, A.D. pp. 121–133. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Maher, T. O. 1983 Ceramic Exchange in the Southeastern United States : An Examination of Three Methods for Mineralogically Characterizing Aboriginal Ceramics from Archaeological Sites in Alabama, Louisiana and Mississippi. Unpublished Master's thesis, Department of Anthropology, Binghamton University, Binghamton, New York.Google Scholar
Millot, G. 1970 Geology of Clays. Translated by Farrand, W. R. and Paquet, H.. Springer-Verlag, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morse, D. F. (editor) 1973 Nodena : An Account of 75 Years of Archaeological Investigation in Southeast Mississippi County, Arkansas. Research Series 4. Arkansas Archeological Survey, Fayetteville.Google Scholar
Morse, D. F, and Morse, P. A. (editors) 1976 A Preliminary Report of the Zebree Project : New Approaches in Contract Archaeology in Arkansas. Research Report 8. Arkansas Archeological Survey. Fayetteville.Google Scholar
Myer, W E. 1927 Two Prehistoric Villages in Middle Tennessee. Forty-First Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology, pp. 485–614. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Neff, H., Glascock, M. D., Stryker, K., Steponaitis, V P., 1991 Chemical Characterization of Moundville Pottery. Manuscript on file, Research Reactor Center, University of Missouri, Columbia.Google Scholar
Neff, H., Glascock, M. D., Stryker, K., Steponaitis, V P., 1966 Significance of Clay Minerals in Shoaling Problems. Committee on Tidal Hydraulics Technical Bulletin 10. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Vicksburg.Google Scholar
Neiheisel, J., and Weaver, C. E. 1967 Transport and Deposition of Clay Minerals, Southeastern United States. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 37 : 1084–1116.Google Scholar
Neuman, R. W. 1984 An Introduction to Louisiana Archaeology. Louisiana State University Press, Baton Rouge.Google Scholar
Olive, W. W., Chleborad, A. F., Frahme, C. W., Shlocker, J., 1989 Swelling Clays Map of the Coterminous United States. 1 sheet, 1 : 7,500,000. Miscellaneous Investigations Series Map 1-1940. U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia.Google Scholar
Peebles, C. S. 1983 Prehistoric Agricultural Communities in West Central Alabama. 3 vols. Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. Report submitted to Interagency Archaeological Services, Atlanta.Google Scholar
Pevear, D. R. 1972 Source of Recent Nearshore Marine Clays, Southeastern United States. Memoir 133. In Environmental Framework of Coastal Plain Estuaries, edited by Nelson, B. W, pp. 317–335. Geological Society of America, Boulder, Colorado.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potter, P. E., Heling, D., Shimp, N. F., and Wie, W. Van 1975 Clay Mineralogy of Modern Alluvial Muds of the Mississippi River Basin. Bulletin du Centre de Recherches de Pau 9(2) : 353–389.Google Scholar
Priddy, R. R. 1961 Geologic Study along Highway 80 from the Alabama Line to Jackson, Mississippi. Bulletin 91. Mississippi State Geological Survey, University.Google Scholar
Rapp, G., Jr. 1985 The Provenance of Artifactual Raw Materials. In Archaeological Geology, edited by Rapp, G., Jr., and J. A. Gifford, pp. 353–375. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut.Google Scholar
Rice, P. 1987 Pottery Analysis : A Sourcebook. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Rolingson, M. A. (editor) 1982 Emerging Patterns of Plum Bayou Culture. Research Series 18. Arkansas Archeological Survey, Fayetteville.Google Scholar
Sayre, E. V 1975 Brookhaven Procedures for Statistical Analyses of Multivariate Archaeometric Data. Report BNL-21693. Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York.Google Scholar
Schnell, F. T, Knight, V J., Jr., and Schnell, G. S. 1981 Cemochechobee : Archaeology of a Mississippian Ceremonial Center on the Chattahoochee River. University Presses of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
Snowden, J. O., Jr., and Priddy, R. R. 1968 Loess Investigations in Mississippi. Bulletin 111. Mississippi Geological, Economic, and Topographical Survey, Jackson.Google Scholar
Steponaitis, V P. 1974 The Late Prehistory of the Natchez Region : Excavations at the Emerald and Foster Sites, Adams County, Mississippi. Unpublished Bachelor's thesis, Department of Anthropology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Steponaitis, V P. 1983 Ceramics, Chronology, and Community Patterns : An Archaeological Study at Moundville. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Steponaitis, V. P., and Blackman, M. J. 1981 Chemical Characterization of Mississippian Pottery. Paper presented at the 38th Annual Meeting of the Southeastern Archaeological Conference, Asheville, North Carolina.Google Scholar
Swanton, J. R. 1946 The Indians of the Southeastern United States. Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin 137. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Szabo, M. W, Osborne, W. E., Copeland, C. W., Jr., 1988 Geologic Map of Alabama. 4 sheets, 1 : 250,000, and table. Special Map 220. Geological Survey of Alabama, Tuscaloosa.Google Scholar
Tobia, S. K., and Sayre, E. V 1974 An Analytical Comparison of Various Egyptian Soils, Clays, Shales, and Some Ancient Pottery by Neutron Activation. In Recent Advances in Science and Technology of Materials, vol. 3, edited by Bishay, A., pp. 99–128. Plenum Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, C. E. 1967 Potassium, Illite, and the Sea. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 31 : 2181–2196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, C. E. 1989 Clays, Muds, and Shales. Developments in Sedimentology 44. Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Williams, S., and Brain, J. P. 1983 Excavations at the Lake George Site, Yazoo County, Mississippi, 1958-1960. Papers of the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology Vol. 74. Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Windom, H. L., Neal, W. J., and Beck, K. C. 1971 Mineralogy of Sediments in Three Georgia Estuaries. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 41(2) : 497–504.Google Scholar
Wyckoff, D. G., and Barr, T. P. 1967 The Cat Smith Site : A Late Prehistoric Village in Muskogee County, Oklahoma. Bulletin of the Oklahoma Anthropological Society 15 : 81–106.Google Scholar