Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-88psn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-16T23:08:46.778Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Local-scale panmixia in the lichenized fungus Xanthoria parietina contrasts with substantial genetic structure in its Trebouxia photobionts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2023

Maja Wyczanska
Affiliation:
Systematics and Ecology of Fungi and Algae, LMU Munich, Menzingerstraße 67, 80638 München, Germany
Karoline Wacker
Affiliation:
Systematics and Ecology of Fungi and Algae, LMU Munich, Menzingerstraße 67, 80638 München, Germany
Paul S. Dyer
Affiliation:
School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK
Silke Werth*
Affiliation:
Systematics and Ecology of Fungi and Algae, LMU Munich, Menzingerstraße 67, 80638 München, Germany
*
Author for correspondence: Silke Werth. E-mail: werth@bio.lmu.de

Abstract

Microsatellite markers can provide valuable information about gene flow and population history. We developed and tested new microsatellites for the nitrophilic lichenized fungus Xanthoria parietina and studied its genetic diversity and structure within the urban area of Munich, Bavaria. We compared its local genetic pattern with that of its photobiont partner Trebouxia decolorans, for which existing microsatellites were applied. For comparison, a reference site with clean air was included in the sampling. We found support for three genetic clusters in the fungus X. parietina, which occurred intermingled in collecting sites. There was a high degree of admixture within fungal populations and individuals, and analysis of molecular variance revealed a lack of population structure in the mycobiont. The Trebouxia photobiont, in contrast, exhibited structured populations which grouped into two to five genetic clusters, and individuals showed less admixture than in the mycobiont. This indicates that the two lichen partners differ in their ability to move around in the landscape. The microsatellite markers we report are polymorphic and are suitable for population genetic studies.

Information

Type
Standard Paper
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - SA
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the same Creative Commons licence is included and the original work is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the British Lichen Society
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Map of Nei's gene diversity in populations of Xanthoria parietina and its photobiont. Size of circles is proportional to gene diversity at sampling sites as per key in the top right-hand side of figures. Seven of the sampling sites were located in the city of Munich (Bavaria, Germany). The inset represents a geographically distant population located in an area with clean air (Hinterstein valley, Oberallgäu). A, mycobiont. B, photobiont. Base map by Maximilian Dörrbecker, shared via Wikimedia Commons (https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:M%C3%BCnchen_-_Stadtbezirke_und_Stadtbezirksteile_(Karte).svg: accessed 29 March 2021).

Figure 1

Table 1. Data for eight populations of Xanthoria parietina sampled in southern Bavaria, Germany. The table provides Nei's gene diversity H of the mycobiont and photobiont (higher values of H correspond to greater diversity) as well as the geographical location of the sampling sites (decimal degrees, map datum WGS84). NO2 data represent averages of two measurements and were taken from Sebald et al. (2022).

Figure 2

Table 2. Newly developed microsatellites for the lichenized fungus Xanthoria parietina. The table shows the forward and reverse primer names and sequences (5ʹ–3ʹ), microsatellite motif, number of repeats (Rep), the genomic scaffold on which the locus is located, and alignment coordinates on the scaffold (start_bp, end_bp), as well as the product size in the sample used for genome sequencing, the number of alleles (NA) and the percentage of missing data (% Missing). Scaffold names and alignment coordinates refer to the Xanpa1 genome assembly of Xanthoria parietina (DOE-JGI Joint Genome Institute). Note that locus Xpa15 did not amplify in our final PCRs and was therefore excluded.

Figure 3

Table 3. Primer mixes for the lichenized fungus Xanthoria parietina (Xpa) and its photobiont Trebouxia decolorans (Tde). NED, VIC, FAM and PET refer to the fluorescent dye labels located at the 5ʹ end of each reverse primer. Each primer stock solution was 10 μM. Note that two primers included in the mix marked with an asterisk (*) did not amplify successfully.

Figure 4

Fig. 2. Principal coordinates analysis of eight populations of Xanthoria parietina and its photobiont in Munich (Bavaria, Germany). Patterns displayed for the first two axes. Each point represents a thallus and symbols represent different populations. A, mycobiont. B, photobiont. In colour online.

Figure 5

Fig. 3. Bayesian analysis of population structure for nine microsatellite markers of Xanthoria parietina and nine microsatellite markers of its photobiont, showing the affiliation of individuals (vertical bars) to genetic clusters (STRUCTURE software). A, mycobiont with three clusters evident (shown in blue, orange, purple). B, photobiont with five clusters evident (shown in blue, green, orange, purple, red). In colour online.

Supplementary material: PDF

Wyczanska et al. supplementary material

Tables S1-S2 and Figures S1-S7

Download Wyczanska et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 744.7 KB