Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-h8lrw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-15T08:14:43.472Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Atomic layer–deposited nanostructures and their applications in energy storage and sensing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 November 2019

Zhe Zhao
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, People’s Republic of China
Ye Kong
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, People’s Republic of China
Zhiwei Zhang
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, People’s Republic of China
Gaoshan Huang
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, People’s Republic of China
Yongfeng Mei*
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, People’s Republic of China
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: yfm@fudan.edu.cn

Abstract

Nanostructures are considered to have great potential and are widely used in energy storage and sensing devices, and atomic layer deposition (ALD) is of great help for better nanostructure fabrications. ALD can help to preserve the original properties of materials, and, meanwhile, the excellent film quality, nanoscale precise thickness control, and high conformality also play important role in fabrication process. To enhance the performance of energy storage and sensor devices, ALD has been used in directly fabricating active nanostructures, depositing protective passivation layers, etc. ALD is a convenient technique which has been widely engaged in energy-related fields including electrochemical conversion and storage, as well as in sensor and biosensors. The related research interest is increasing significantly. In this review, we summarize some of the latest works on ALD for batteries, supercapacitors, and sensors, and demonstrate the benefits of ALD comprehensively. In these devices, different materials are deposited by ALD under different conditions to achieve better battery performance, higher supercapacitor capacitance, and higher sensitivity. This review fully presents the strengths of ALD and its application in energy storage and sensing devices and proposes the future prospects for this rapidly developing technology.

Information

Type
REVIEW
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2019
Figure 0

Figure 1: Complex nanostructures synthesized by ALD. (a) Pt nanotube structure observed inside porous anodic alumina template cross‐section. Adapted from Ref. 141. (b) ZnO nanomembrane obtained with 200 ALD cycles. The inset shows the ZnO nanomembranes in a vial. Adapted from Ref. 150. (c) CNT@Co3O4 on CC. Adapted from Ref. 127. (d) Nanoporous gold films after CoO deposition. Adapted from Ref. 136. (e) 2D honeycomb lattice photonic crystal fabricated in an air-bridge format. Adapted from Ref. 138. (f) Ni grown on CNTs after 250 cycles of ALD (as illustrated in the inset). Adapted from Ref. 135. (g) C/ZnO porous network of the sample after pyrolysis. Adapted from Ref. 79. (h) Rat cortical neuron on the sensor input structure of a CMOS FG FET chip, which was passivated by an Al2O3/HfO2 multilayer. Adapted from Ref. 81. (i) Conical Al2O3 replicas obtained by coating the conical nanochannels by 150 cycles of ALD Al2O3. Adapted from Ref. 139.

Figure 1

Figure 2: (a) Schematic of the wetting behavior of garnet surface with molten Li. (b) SEM images of the garnet solid-state electrolyte/Li metal interface. Without the ALD-Al2O3 coating, garnet has a poor interfacial contact with Li metal even on heating. With the help of ALD–Al2O3 coating on garnet, Li metal can uniformly bond with garnet at the interface on heating. Inset are photos of melted Li metal on top of the garnet surface clearly demonstrating classical wetting behavior for the ALD-treated garnet surface. (a) and (b) are adapted from Ref. 104. (c) Schematic illustration of the preparation process for SC@Se–xAl2O3 composites. (d) Cycle stability of SC@Se–xAl2O3 composites. (e) Comparison of the rate capability of SC@Se–xAl2O3 composites expressed as a percentage of the initial capacity at 0.1 C. (c)–(e) are adapted from Ref. 102.

Figure 2

Figure 3: (a) Schematic illustration of the NG/S–TiO2 preparation process and the experimental demonstration showing that the battery can light up two blue LEDs. (b) The rate performances of the electrodes at various current densities. (a) and (b) are adapted from Ref. 109. Characterization of as-prepared HF-etched Ti3C2 MXene: (c) XRD patterns of Ti3AlC2 and Ti3C2. (d) Typical SEM image of HF-etched Ti3C2 Mxene. TEM analysis of MXene sheets coated with a 50 nm-thick layer of SnO2: low-magnification TEM image and SAED pattern for ALD (e) at 150 °C and (f) at 200 °C. (g) Fourier-filtered high-resolution RGB image for ALD at 200 °C, showing the presence of two phases and (h) STEM image along with the EDS line-scan for ALD @150 °C showing the conformal SnO2 coating. (c)–(h) are adapted from Ref. 110.

Figure 3

Figure 4: (a) Schematic of the synthesis procedure of CZC nanosheets. SEM images demonstrating the change of the electrode structure before and after 200 discharge/charge cycles. (b) Cross-sectional TEM image of a CZC nanosheet. The nanosheet is composed of a sandwiched structure. (c) High-resolution TEM image of the C/ZnO interface. (d) Nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms and pore size distribution (inset) of the CZC nanosheet sample. (a)–(d) are adapted from Ref. 79. (e) Schematic diagram of ZG preparation and corresponding device assembling. (f) CV curves of anode made from ZG300 (first three cycles) at 0.2 mV/s. The inset shows corresponding CV results from pure ZnO anode for comparison. (g) The 1st, 2nd, 5th, and 10th discharge and charge curves of ZG300 and pure ZnO (inset) at a current rate of 200 mA/g; (h) EIS of anode made from EG and ZG composites before galvanostatic discharging/charging cycles. The inset shows the equivalent circuit used to fit the experimental results. (e)–(h) are adapted from Ref. 112.

Figure 4

Figure 5: (a) Optical analysis of lithium foil surface tarnishing during atmospheric exposure at 25 °C and 40% relative humidity. (α) unprotected and (β) 14 nm ALD Al2O3-protected Li metal foil immediately upon removal from an argon atmosphere (γ) Bare and (δ) 14 nm ALD Al2O3-protected Li metal foil after 20 h exposed to atmosphere at 25 °C and 40% relative humidity. (b) anode protected with 14 nm ALD Al2O3 LiS cells. (a)–(e) are adapted from Ref. 57. (c) Schematic illustration of the CSB@TiO2 electrode preparation process. (d) TEM images of the CSB@TiO2 nanofiber and photograph of the CSB@TiO2 freestanding electrode. (c) and (d) are adapted from Ref. 114. (e) Digital images of GO–S dispersion, as-obtained G–S hydrogel and a bent G–S aerogel. Scale bars, 1 cm. Adapted from Ref. 115.

Figure 5

Figure 6: (a) The morphology and electrochemical performance of Co3O4 nanolayers on a flexible CC, (b) capacitance at various current densities of as-obtained composites. (a) and (b) are adapted from Ref. 127. (c) Schematic image of V2O5 thin films via ALD process on active carbon powders. (d) Specific capacitance at various scan rates, (c) and (d) are adapted from Ref. 128. (e) and (g) SEM images of uncoated CNT and smooth nanostructured vanadium oxide coatings on the surface of multiwalled carbon nanotube. (f) and (h) Charge discharge curves of as-obtained materials. (e)–(h) are adapted from Ref. 37.

Figure 6

Figure 7: (a)–(d) SEM images of TiO2–G composite grown different ALD cycles. (e) Specific capacitance at various scan rates. (a)–(e) are adapted from Ref. 35. (f)–(i) Fabrication process and morphologies of TiO2 nanomembranes with different thicknesses. (f) Sketch represented fabrication process of TiO2 nanomembranes. (g)–(i) SEM images of TiO2 nanomembranes with 100, 200, and 400 ALD cycles, respectively. (j) Specific capacitance at various current densities. (f)–(j) are adapted from Ref. 80.

Figure 7

Figure 8: (a) SEM image of CNT–Ni composites. (b) Amperometric responses of the CNT–Ni–GCE with constant stirring in 0.1 M NaOH after successive glucose additions at Va of +0.50 V. Inset: the amperometric response to 2 and 5 μM. (a) and (b) are adapted from Ref. 135. (c) TEM images of NiO/SiC composites. (d) CV curves of NiO/SiC with different ALD cycles in 1 M KOH solution at a scan rate of 50 mV/s. (c) and (d) are adapted from Ref. 78. (e) SEM image of NPG films after CoO deposition with various ALD cycles. (f) CV curves of the NPG/CoO electrode in 0.5 m KOH solution with different amounts of glucose at a scan rate of 20 mV/s. (e) and (f) are adapted from Ref. 136. (g) TEM image of CF@CuAl-LDH. (h) Dose–response curve for glucose detection. (g) and (h) are adapted from Ref. 137.

Figure 8

Figure 9: (a) Schematic surface functionalization steps for biosensing test. Graphs show the lasing spectra of the biosensors in (b) dipole-like Γ2 BEL mode and (c) monopole-like Γ1 BEL mode. Spectra in each plot are vertically shifted for clarity. (a)–(c) are adapted from Ref. 138. (d) and (e) The illustration of sensing events: (I) washing with PBS 1:1000, (II) incubating 5 × 108 CFU/mL E. faecium in synthetic urine, (III) incubating 5 × 108 CFU/mL S. epidermidis in synthetic urine and (IV) incubating lysostaphin. Shifts after wash Δ1, Δ2, and Δ3 are evaluated after the addition of E. faecium, S. epidermidis, and lytic enzymes, respectively. (d) and (e) are adapted from Ref. 82. (f) Schematic illustration of uniform ALD coating on a single conical nanochannel. (g) Example of current trace seen before and after adding buffered 100 nM BSA solution to the tip side of the conical nanochannel. (f) and (g) are adapted from Ref. 139. (h) and (i) The schematic image and SEM micrograph of a freestanding region of TiO2 waveguide. (h) and (i) are adapted from Ref. 92.

Figure 9

Figure 10: (a) Pictures of the front and back sides of the hotplate template. (b) Sensor response for a CO pressure of 11 m torr at 300 °C for different thicknesses of ALD SnOx films thicknesses. (a) and (b) are adapted from Ref. 142. (c) Schematic of 1D p-CuO/n-ZnO hollow nanofibers synthesis using a three-step method. (d) Responses of the 0.3 (g) CuO/ZnO200 (cycles), 0.3 (g) CuO/ZnO400 (cycles), and 0.3 (g) CuO/ZnO600 (cycles) HNFs sensors. (e) Dynamic resistance changes of 0.3CuO/ZnO600 HNFs sensor exposed to 100 ppm H2S as a function of operating temperature. (c)–(e) are adapted from Ref. 145. (f) SEM images of ZnO nanosheet on sponge and freestanding ZnO nanosheet. (g) Responsivity varying with the voltage under different irradiated power densities. (f)–(g) are adapted from Ref. 149.