Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-7lfxl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-18T05:45:04.927Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

n-3 Oil sources for use in aquaculture – alternatives to the unsustainable harvest of wild fish

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2008

Matthew R. Miller*
Affiliation:
CSIRO Food Futures Flagship and Division of Marine and Atmospheric Research, GPO Box 1538, Hobart, Tasmania7001, Australia Crop & Food Research, Processed Foods Group, PO Box 5114, Nelson, New Zealand7000, New Zealand
Peter D. Nichols
Affiliation:
CSIRO Food Futures Flagship and Division of Marine and Atmospheric Research, GPO Box 1538, Hobart, Tasmania7001, Australia
Chris G. Carter
Affiliation:
National Centre for Marine Conservation and Resource Sustainability, Locked Bag 1370, Launceston, Tasmania7250, Australia
*
*Corresponding author: Dr Matthew Miller, fax +63 3 546 7049, email MillerM@crop.cri.nz
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The present review examines renewable sources of oils with n-3 long-chain ( ≥ C20) PUFA (n-3 LC-PUFA) as alternatives to oil from wild-caught fish in aquafeeds. Due to the increased demand for and price of wild-caught marine sources of n-3 LC-PUFA-rich oil, their effective and sustainable replacement in aquafeeds is an industry priority, especially because dietary n-3 LC-PUFA from eating fish are known to have health benefits in human beings. The benefits and challenges involved in changing dietary oil in aquaculture are highlighted and four major potential sources of n-3 LC-PUFA for aquafeeds, other than fish oil, are compared. These sources of oil, which contain n-3 LC-PUFA, specifically EPA (20 : 5n-3) and DHA (22 : 6n-3) or precursors to these key essential fatty acids, are: (1) other marine sources of oil; (2) vegetable oils that contain biosynthetic precursors, such as stearidonic acid, which may be used by fish to produce n-3 LC-PUFA; (3) single-cell oil sources of n-3 LC-PUFA; (4) vegetable oils derived from oil-seed crops that have undergone genetic modification to contain n-3 LC-PUFA. The review focuses on Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.), because it is the main intensively cultured finfish species and it both uses and stores large amounts of oil, in particular n-3 LC-PUFA, in the flesh.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2008
Figure 0

Table 1 Fatty acid profiles (g/100 g) of possible plant or vegetable replacement oils for fish oil

Figure 1

Fig. 1 Representation of the n-3 and n-6 long-chain ( ≥ C20) PUFA biosynthetic pathways from their C18 fatty acid precursors in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). OA, oleic acid; LA, linoleic acid; Δ5, Δ 6 and Δ6*, fatty acyl desaturases; GLA, γ-linolenic acid; ELO, fatty acyl elongases; AA, arachidonic acid; DPA-6, docosapentaenoic acid (n-6); Short, fatty acyl peroxisomal chain shortening; ALA, α-linolenic acid; SDA, stearidonic acid; ETA, eicosatetraenoic acid; DPA-3, docosapentaenoic acid (n-3). Δ6* may or may not be the same desaturase enzyme as Δ6. Δ9#, Δ12# and Δ15# are not present in Atlantic salmon. Adapted from Tocher(24).