Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T06:20:38.061Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Changes in Philippine labour relations policy: Convergence or divergence of productivity, flexibility and welfare?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

Jonathan P Sale  and
Arlene B Sale
Jonathan P Sale*
Affiliation:
University of the Philippines, Philippines
*
Jonathan P Sale, School of Labor and Industrial Relations, Bonifacio Hall, E. Jacinto Street University of the Philippines Diliman, Quezon City, National Capital Region 1101, Philippines. Email: jona_sale@yahoo.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the first decade of the present century, a succession of changes to Philippine labour law and jurisprudence sought to contribute to productivity and social welfare by introducing greater industrial relations flexibility, based on collective bargaining and voluntary dispute settlement. The article examines whether these changes actually resulted in any shift from a rights-based system for resolving industrial disputation to a system based on workplace-level interest-based negotiation, and whether they were accompanied either by higher labour productivity or by improved social welfare. The analysis draws on a conceptual framework that identifies coherent national labour regulation systems as being based on a convergence of three institutional approaches – to the operation of labour markets, of labour relations and of social security. Broadly, such labour regulation systems can be classified as either civil law or common law based. The Philippine labour regulation system is shown to have a hybrid basis, whose origins are briefly traced by identifying the legacy of the colonial and post-colonial phases, the martial law era and the restoration of democracy in 1986. Whereas Australia, another hybrid system, appears to have achieved some coherence in changes to the regulation of industrial relations, labour markets and social welfare, in the Philippines, such changes have not converged. In the 1990s, efforts to mitigate the traditional legalistic and adversarial character of industrial relations through liberalisation of restrictions on the right to organise were cross-cut by the effects of the growing labour market flexibility that resulted from integration into the global economy. Legal changes between 1999 and 2011 have not fostered voluntary self-organisation of distributive bargaining at enterprise level. Union membership, collective bargaining coverage and numbers of workers involved in notified or actual industrial action have declined, while reliance on compulsory arbitration and monetary compensation claims has remained high. Labour productivity has not improved. Within the context of globalisation, the labour market is increasingly characterised by numerical flexibility and a prevalence of small enterprises. High unemployment levels and a large informal sector indicate divergence between the systems for regulating labour and welfare.

Keywords

Collective bargainingflexibilitylabour disputeslabour market changesunions
Type
Non-Symposium Articles
Information
The Economic and Labour Relations Review , Volume 25 , Issue 2: Symposium - Some Impacts of Neoliberalism , June 2014 , pp. 327 - 352
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Act 4055 (1933) An act providing for mediation, conciliation, and arbitration in controversies between landlords and tenants and between employers and employees, and for other purposes. 9th Philippine Legislature. Official Gazette 31 (35) p.1181 (3/23/1933).Google Scholar
Agabon, et al. v. National Labor Relations Commission, et al. (2004). G.R. No. 158693, November 1. Digest available: http://www.scribd.com/doc/125851634/Agabon-v-NLRC-Digest (accessed 1 May 2014).Google Scholar
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) (2012) Decline in trade union membership. In Employee Earnings, Benefits and Trade Union Membership, Australia, August 2011. Cat. No. 6310.0. Available: http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/6310.0main+features3August%202011 (accessed 29 April 2014).Google Scholar
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) (2013) Forms of Employment. Cat No. 6349.0. Available: http://www.ausstats.abs.gov.au/ausstats/subscriber.nsf/0/D2A1C33F7F6090F2CA257B94001104D7/$File/63590_november%202012.pdf (accessed 29 April 2014).Google Scholar
Balnave, N, Brown, J, Maconachie, G, Stone, RJ (2009) Employment Relations in Australia. 2nd Edition. Milton, QLD: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Bitonio, BER Jr (2012) Industrial relations and collective bargaining in the Philippines. Dialogue Working Paper No. 41, November. Industrial and Employment Relations Department, International Labour Organization Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific. Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
Bool-Sale, A, Sale, JP (2010) Turnover and voice in Philippine call centers. Philippine Journal of Labor and Industrial Relations 30(1-2): 1-17.Google Scholar
Botero, J, Djankov, S, La Porta, R, Lopes-de-Silanes, F, Schleifer, A (2004) The regulation of labor. Quarterly Journal of Economics 119(4): 1339-1382.Google Scholar
Budd, JW (2011) The Thought of Work. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Bureau of Labour and Employment Statistics (2013a) Philippine Yearbook of Industry and Labor Statistics. Manila: DoLE. Available: http://www.bles.dole.gov.ph/PUBLICATIONS/Industry%20Yearbook/Philippine%20Industry%20Yearbook%20of%20Labor%20Statistics.html (accessed 3 May 2014).Google Scholar
Bureau of Labour and Employment Statistics (2013b) Yearbook of Labor Statistics. Manula: DoLE. Available: http://www.bles.dole.gov.ph/PUBLICATIONS/Yearbook%20of%20Labor%20Statistics/YLS_Home.html (accessed 1 May 2014).Google Scholar
Cacdac, HLJ, Audea, TE (2005). The state of Philippine voluntary arbitration. available: http://www.ncmb.ph/Publications/publications.htm (accessed 29 April 2014).Google Scholar
Civil Code of the Philippines (1949) Republic Act No. 386. An act to ordain and institute the civil code of the Philippines. Available:www.gov.ph/downloads/1949/06jun/19490618-RA-0386-JPL.pdf (accessed 29 April 2014).Google Scholar
Commonwealth Act No. 103 (1936) ChanRobles Publishing Company. Available: Commonwealth Act No. 103, October 29, 1936.pdf (accessed 30 April 2014).Google Scholar
Coquia, JR (1979) Principles of Roman Law. Quezon City: Phoenix Press, Inc.Google Scholar
Department of Labor and Employment (DoLE) Order No. 10, Series of 1997, Amending the rules implementing books III and VI of the Labor Code, as amended. Available: http://www.chanrobles.com/doledepartmentorderno10-1997.htm#Department%20Order%20No.%2010 (accessed 30 April 2014).Google Scholar
Department of Labor and Employment (DoLE) (2001) Order No. 03-01. Revoking Department Order No. 10, Series of 1997 and Continuing to Prohibit Labor-Only ContractingBack. Available: http://www.dole.gov.ph/issuances/view/3 (accessed 30 April 2014).Google Scholar
Department of Labor and Employment (DoLE) (2002) Department Order No. 18-02, Series of 2002. Rules implementing articles 106 to 109 of the labor code, as amended. Available: http://www.chanrobles.com/doledepartmentorderno18-02-2002.html#Department%20Order%20No.%2018-02 Google Scholar
Department of Labor and Employment (DoLE) (2003) Department Order No. 40-03, Series of 2003. Amending the implementing rules of Book V of the Labor Code of the Philippines. Available: http://www.ncmb.ph/Publications/Labor_Laws/DO%2040-03.pdf (accessed 30 April 2014).Google Scholar
Department of Labor and Employment (2004) Manual on Labor Standards. Manila: Bureau of Working Conditions Intramuros.Google Scholar
Department of Labor and Employment (DoLE) (2005a) Department Order No. 40-C-03, Series of 2005: Amending Sec. 2, Rule II, Book V of the Omnibus Rules Implementing the Labor Code, as Amended by DO 40-03, Series of 2003. Available: http://www.dole.gov.ph/issuances/view/76 (accessed 1 May 2014).Google Scholar
Department of Labor and Employment (DoLE) (2005b) Department Order No. 40-E-03, Series of 2005: Amending Rule IX, Book V of the Omnibus Rules Implementing the Labor Code, as Amended by DO 40-03, Series of 2003.Google Scholar
Department of Labor and Employment (DoLE) (2008) Department Order No. 40-F-03, Series of 2008: Amending Rules III, V, VIII, IX, XI, XIV and XV of the Implementing Rules of Book V of the Labor Code, as Amended by DO 40-03, Series of 2003, pursuant to Republic Act No. 9481 . Available: http://blr.dole.gov.ph/PDFandDownloadables/LegalIssuancesandArticles/DO40F-03.pdf (accessed 2 May 2014).Google Scholar
Department of Labor and Employment (DoLE) (2010a) Department Order No. 40-G-03, Series of 2010: Amending Rule XXII of the Implementing Rules of Book V of the Labor Code, as Amended by DO 40-03, Series of 2003. Available: http://ncmb.ph/Publications/DOLE/DO40-G-03_S_2010.pdf (accessed 2 May 2014)Google Scholar
Department of Labor and Employment (DoLE) (2010b) Department Order No. 107-10, Series of 2010. Guidelines on the single entry approach prescribing a 30-day mandatory conciliation-mediation services for all labor and employment cases. Available: http://blr.dole.gov.ph/index.php/legal-issuances-and-articles (accessed 30 April 2014).Google Scholar
Department of Labor and Employment (DoLE) (2011a) Notes on DO 18-A, Series of 2011. Available: www.ffcccii.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/NotesDO-18-A.pdf (accessed 20 April 2014).Google Scholar
Department of Labor and Employment (DoLE) (2011b) Order No. 18-A, Series of 2011. Rules implementing articles 106 to 109 of the labor code, as amended. Available: http://www.gov.ph/2011/11/14/dole-department-order-no-18a-11-s-2011/ (accessed 30 April 2014).Google Scholar
Foster, DM (2005) Politics, legal origins, and the roots of modern economic institutions. Seminar Paper for Advanced Issues in Corporate Governance. Available: http://www.law.harvard,edu/programs/olin_center/corporate_governance/papers/Foster-Brudney_June.2005.pdf.Google Scholar
Healy, J (2014) The Australian labour market in 2013. NILS working paper series No 203/2014. Adelaide: National Institute of Labour Studies, Flinders University.Google Scholar
Institute for Labor Studies (2005) The assumption and certification power in the Philippines: context, issues and options. ILS Monograph Series No. 14. Manila: Institute for Labor Studies.Google Scholar
International Labour Organization (ILO) Department of Statistics (2012) Statistical update on employment in the informal economy. Available: http://laborsta.ilo.org/applv8/data/INFORMAL_ECONOMY/2012-06-Statistical%20update%20-%20v2.pdf (accessed 5 May 2014).Google Scholar
Kalleberg, AL (2009) Precarious work, insecure workers: Employment relations in transition. American Sociological Review 74(1): 1-22.Google Scholar
King of Kings Transport, Inc., et al. v. Mamac, G.R. No. 166208, June 29, 2007. Available: http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2007/june2007/166208.htm (accessed 30 April 2014).Google Scholar
Lurie, L (2012) Integrative employment and social security rights. Available: http://works.bepress.com/lilach_lurie/1 (accessed 6 October 2012) http://www.flexworkresearch.org/uploaded_files/publications/Lurie.pdf.Google Scholar
March, JG (1994) A Primer on Decision Making: How Decisions Happen. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Miraflor, M, Manalac, S (2012) BPO industry expects more dramatic growth ahead, The Manila Times, reprinted in The Sauce , 15 August. Available: http://thesauce.net.au/philippines-bpo-industry-expects-more-dramatic-growth-ahead/ (accessed 30 April 2014).Google Scholar
Mitchell, R, O’Donnell, A, Ramsay, I, Welsh, M (2013) Labour law and institutional configurations in different varieties of capitalism: What does the Australian case tell us about the utility of cross-national typologies? Paper presented to Labour Law Research Network Inaugural Conference, Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, 13-15 June. Available: http://www.upf.edu/gredtiss/_pdf/2013-LLRNConf_MitchellEtAl.pdf (accessed 21 March 2014).Google Scholar
Montecillo, P (2011) BPO sector in the Philippines not just about call centers. Philippine Daily Inquirer 10 July. Available: http://business.inquirer.net/6592/bpo-sector-in-philippines-not-just-about-call-centers (accessed 21 March 2014).Google Scholar
National Conciliation and Mediation Board (1999) Primer on Grievance and Voluntary Arbitration. Available: http://ncmb.ph/VAP/Publications/Voluntary_Arbitration/PrimerGMVA.htm (accessed 21 March 2014).Google Scholar
National Statistical Coordination Board (2013) Poverty statistics – data and charts. Manila: Philippine Statistics Authority. Available: http://www.nscb.gov.ph/poverty/dataCharts.asp (accessed 5 May 2013).Google Scholar
People v. Pomar, 46 Phil. 440 (1924).Google Scholar
Presidential Decree 442 (1974) Labor Code of the Philippines. Manila: Official Gazette. Available: http://www.gov.ph/1974/05/01/presidential-decree-no-442-s-1974/ (accessed 30 April 2014).Google Scholar
Republic Act No. 875 (1953) Available: http://www.lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra1953/ra_875_1953.html (accessed 29 April 2014).Google Scholar
Republic Act No. 6715 (1987) Manila: Congress of the Philippines. Available: http://www.lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra1989/ra_6715_1989.html (accessed 30 April 2014).Google Scholar
Republic Act No. 9481 (2007) Manila: Congress of the Philippines. Available: http://www.lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2007/ra_9481_2007.html (accessed 29 April 2014).Google Scholar
Republic Act No. 10151 (2010) Manila: Congress of the Philippines. http://www.gov.ph/2011/06/21/republic-act-no-1015/ (accessed 30 April 2014).Google Scholar
Sale, J (2002) ‘New rules on contracting and subcontracting: Flexibility vs. job security’, Manila Bulletin, May 25, col. Business Focus. Available: http://www.dlsu.edu.ph/research/centers/cberd/pdf/bus_focus/Newrules.pdf (accessed 2 May 2014).Google Scholar
Sale, JP (2009) Labor disputes, trade unions and collective bargaining: an analysis from a decision theoretic perspective. Paper presented at the 15th World Congress, International Industrial Relations Association (IIRA), Sydney, Australia, held on 24th to 27th August 2009. Available: http://www.ilera-directory.org/15thworldcongress/files/papers/Track_4/Thur_W5_SALE.pdf (accessed 30 April 2014).Google Scholar
Sale, JP (2011) The governance of decision making and labor dispute settlement in the Philippines: Shifting methods from command to collaboration or vice-versa? Doctoral Dissertation, University of the Philippines National College of Public Administration and Governance.Google Scholar
Sale, JP (2012) Labor market governance and regional development in the Philippines: uneven trends and outcomes. World Technopolis Review 1(3): 192-205.Google Scholar
Sale, JP, Bool, AC (2010) Recent developments in Philippine labor market governance: shifting methods from command to collaboration? OIDA International Journal of Sustainable Development 1(6): 79-88.Google Scholar
Serrano v. National Labor Relations Commission and Isetann Department Store (2000) G.R. No. 117040, January 27. Available: http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2000/jan2000/117040_jan2000.htm (accessed 23 March 2014).Google Scholar
Standard Chartered Bank v. Standard Chartered Bank Employees Union, G.R. No. 165550, October 08, 2008, 568 SCRA 135.Google Scholar
Walton, RE, McKersie, RB (1965) An Integrative Theory of Labor Negotiations. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Wilson, S, Ebert, N (2013) Precarious work: Economic, sociological and political perspectives. Economic and Labour Relations Review 13(3): 263-278.Google Scholar
The 1987 Constitution of the Republic of the Philippines. 11 February. Available: http://www.gov.ph/constitutions/the-1987-constitution-of-the-republic-of-the-philippines/ (accessed 29 April 2014).Google Scholar
Vosko, L (2010) Managing the Margin: Gender, Citizenship and the International Regulation of Precarious Employment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Woodley, M (ed.) (2013) Osborn’s Concise Law Dictionary. 12th edition. London: Sweet and Maxwell.Google Scholar