Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-45ctf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-27T14:46:50.284Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Gravity-driven film flow over isolated topography in a circular pipe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2025

Joel P. Kuehner*
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Engineering, Washington and Lee University, Lexington, VA 24450, USA
Isaiah R. Mefford
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Engineering, Washington and Lee University, Lexington, VA 24450, USA
*
Corresponding author: Joel P. Kuehner, kuehnerj@wlu.edu

Abstract

Gravity-driven film flow in circular pipes with isolated topography was examined with fluorescence imaging for three flow rates, two angles of inclination, and four topography shapes. The time-averaged free surface response in the vicinity of the topography depended on flow rate, inclination angle and topography shape. For some flow conditions, the time-averaged free surface included a capillary ridge, and for a subset of those conditions, a series of capillary waves developed upstream with a spacing often approximated by half the capillary length. In contrast to film flow over planar topography, the capillary ridge often formed downstream of the topography, and for the lowest flow rate over rectangular step down topography, the free surface developed a steady overhang along the downstream face of the topography. Possible dynamic causes of the unique film flow behaviour in circular pipes are discussed. Transient free surface fluctuations were observed at half the magnitude reported in film flow over corrugated circular pipes, and local maxima in transient magnitude corresponded to axial locations of inflection points in the time-averaged free surface. Local maxima are related to low surface pressure regions that vary in location and amplitude. Rectangular step down topography generated an extra ridge of fluid that formed on top of the capillary ridge for flow conditions, resulting in a capillary ridge downstream of the step. The extra ridge varied in temporal duration and spatial extent, and finds no comparison in planar film flow. No evidence of periodic behaviour was detected in the transient film response.

Information

Type
JFM Papers
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NC
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original article is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained prior to any commercial use.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. Schematic of the experimental flow apparatus with an approximation of water location within the circular pipe for a rectangular step down topography. Laser and laser sheet edges are indicated, and the portion of the laser sheet that is captured by the field of view of the camera is shown. The camera is mounted above the pipe and inclined downwards towards the field of view at an angle that is accounted for in calibration.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Axial variations of topography shape for (a) rectangular step down (RSD), (b) triangular step down (TSD), (c) rectangular trough (RTR), and (d) triangular trough (TTR) topographies. Substrate amplitude $a$ and axial length $L$ are shown. Average pipe diameter $D$ and the pipe centreline are included only in the top row of substrates, and are similarly defined for all substrates.

Figure 2

Table 1. Characteristic properties and non-dimensional parameters.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Schematic displaying (a) an upstream facing view of the yellow circular segment that identifies the reference span $b$, (b) the pipe geometry used to define the reference span as the chord associated with the yellow circular segment, and (c) an isometric view of the yellow circular segment within the topography.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Comparison of the edge-detection results using the Canny method (cyan line) and the results using the c.d.f. method (yellow line) for an instantaneous image just upstream of the RSD topography for $Re=69$ and $\alpha =15.3^{\circ }$.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Instantaneous fluorescence image of film flow over TTR topography. The red line indicates the approximated location of the substrate. The coordinate system employed for axial distance $x$, absolute free surface elevation $h$, and substrate elevation $h^{ }_{o}$ is shown. The fluorescence within the volume of the film is viewed through the non-uniform free surface, causing a distortion that makes the bottom of the water appear detached from the substrate.

Figure 6

Table 2. Summary of measurement uncertainty.

Figure 7

Figure 6. Time-averaged absolute free surface elevation normalized by substrate amplitude for (a) RSD, (b) TSD, (c) RTR and (d) TTR topographies. Data are replicated in figure 7 with increased magnification for clarity. Substrate topography is shown as a grey line. Uncertainty in substrate location is approximately $0.08a$, and in absolute free surface elevation is approximately $0.02a$.

Figure 8

Figure 7. Time-averaged absolute free surface elevation normalized by substrate amplitude for (a) RSD, (b) TSD, (c) RTR and (d) TTR topographies. Data are identical to those shown in figure 6, with increased magnification to improve clarity. Substrate topography is shown as a grey line. Uncertainty in substrate location is approximately $0.08a$, and in absolute free surface elevation is approximately $0.02a$.

Figure 9

Figure 8. Time-averaged film thickness normalized by substrate amplitude at $x/L=-1.5$, spatially averaged over $x/L=-0.5$ to $x/L=1.5$, and at $x/L=3.0$ for (a) RSD, (b) TSD, (c) RTR and (d) TTR topographies.

Figure 10

Figure 9. The dependence of the axial location of the capillary ridge normalized by $L$ on topography shape. Uncertainty is approximately $0.005L$, which is smaller than the resolution of the figure so uncertainty bars are omitted for clarity.

Figure 11

Figure 10. The dependence of the absolute free surface elevation of the capillary ridge normalized by substrate amplitude on topography shape.

Figure 12

Figure 11. The dependence of the absolute capillary ridge elevation normalized by substrate amplitude on upstream film thickness measured at $x/L=-1.5$. Substrate topography is indicated by line type: RSD (solid), TSD (dashed), RTR (dotted) and TTR (dash-dotted).

Figure 13

Figure 12. Axial spacing normalized by $L$ between successive capillary crests up to and including the capillary ridge. Substrate topography is indicated by the letter next to each marker: a – RSD, c – RTR and d – TTR. Uncertainty is approximately $0.005L$, which is smaller than the resolution of the figure so uncertainty bars are omitted for clarity.

Figure 14

Figure 13. Amplitude of transient free surface fluctuations normalized by substrate amplitude for (a) RSD, (b) TSD, (c) RTR and (d) TTR topographies. Substrate topography is plotted over a radial scale different from $A^{ }_{t}/a$. Uncertainty in amplitude of transient free surface fluctuations is approximately $0.02a$.

Figure 15

Figure 14. Instantaneous absolute free surface elevation normalized by substrate amplitude for RTR topography, $Re=69$ and $\alpha =15.3^{\circ }$ at $t^{ }_{o}$ (solid line), $t^{ }_{o}+0.04\,\text{s}$ (dashed line) and $t^{ }_{o}+0.08\,\text{s}$ (dash-dotted line). A three-point moving average is applied to absolute free surface elevation data to improve clarity. The amplitude of transient free surface fluctuations normalized by substrate amplitude from figure 13(a) is plotted on a different radial scale for comparison (dotted line). Substrate topography is shown as a grey line. Uncertainty in substrate location is approximately $0.08a$, and in absolute free surface elevation is approximately $0.02a$.

Figure 16

Figure 15. Amplitude of transient free surface fluctuations normalized by substrate amplitude for the radial portion of the time-averaged absolute free surface elevation for the RSD topography, $Re=69$ and $\alpha =15.3^{\circ }$. Time-averaged absolute free surface elevation and substrate topography, shown as a grey line, are plotted over an axial scale different from $A^{ }_{t}/a$. Uncertainty in amplitude of transient free surface fluctuations is approximately $0.02a$.

Figure 17

Figure 16. The dependence of maximum amplitude of transient free surface fluctuations normalized by substrate amplitude on topography shape.

Figure 18

Figure 17. Instantaneous fluorescence images of film flow over RSD topography for $Re=125$, $\alpha =15.3^{\circ }$, with (a) extra ridge evident and (b) extra ridge not evident. Image intensity is plotted on a logarithmic scale for clarity. The red line indicates the approximated location of the substrate, and the purple line represents the time-averaged free surface profile presented in figures 6 and 7. The fluorescence within the volume of the film is viewed through the non-uniform free surface, causing a distortion that makes the bottom of the water appear detached from the substrate.

Figure 19

Figure 18. Instantaneous fluorescence images of film flow over RSD topography for $Re=97$, $\alpha =20.3^{\circ }$, with (a,b,d) extra ridge evident, and (c) extra ridge not evident. Image intensity is plotted on a logarithmic scale for clarity. The red line indicates the approximated location of the substrate, and the pink line represents the time-averaged free surface profile presented in figures 6 and 7. The fluorescence within the volume of the film is viewed through the non-uniform free surface, causing a distortion that makes the bottom of the water appear detached from the substrate.