Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-7cz98 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-18T18:57:51.376Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Flow of anisotropic ice from the EPICA core: a new test apparatus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 September 2017

Peter R. Sammonds
Affiliation:
Rock and Ice Physics Laboratory, Research School of Geological and Geophysical Sciences, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, England
S. Boon
Affiliation:
Rock and Ice Physics Laboratory, Research School of Geological and Geophysical Sciences, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, England
N. Hughes
Affiliation:
Rock and Ice Physics Laboratory, Research School of Geological and Geophysical Sciences, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, England
M. A. Rist
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Metallurgy, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3Q2, England
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Our objective is to measure the mechanical properties of anisotropic ice of the EPICA ice core, from Dome Concordia, Antarctica, through the full depth of the borehole in deformation experiments under simulated ice-sheet conditions of temperature and pressure. We propose to undertake experiments on the EPICA core using both a conventional triaxial-test apparatus and a new, true, triaxial-test apparatus incorporating automated tomographic imaging of the ice-fabric evolution during deformation. We present the design of this new apparatus together with our testing methodology for EPICA ice. The new apparatus is capable of deforming an ice specimen, up to 200 mm × 100 mm × 40 mm, under servo-controlled biaxial loading with a superimposed confining pressure of 50 MPa and at temperatures down to –40°C. Highly unusual problems arising from the true triaxial nature of the apparatus and tomographic imaging are discussed.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2000
Figure 0

Table 1. Tables of stiffness constants for ice in matrix form according to the rule 11–1, 22–2, 33–3, 23–4 (from Hobbs, 1974)

Figure 1

Fig. 1. Stress-invariant domains for compressive stress for: (a) (J2,.J3) space; and (b) (P,J2) space (after Morland and Earle, 1983). Comparison of biaxial tests (σ1, ≠ σ2, σ3<τ3 = 0) with convention triaxial tests (a, ≠ a2 = σ3) for isotropic deformation.

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Schematic diagram of the pressurized biaxial cell for ice and conceptual diagram of the loading system.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Section through the pressure vessel of the pressurized biaxial cell for ice.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Conceptual diagram of the scanning elastic-wave-velocity tomographic system.

Figure 5

Fig. 5. EPICA-DomeCcore-cutting scheme for mechanical- and physical-properties studies