Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-ktprf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-13T16:48:49.300Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Candida albicans isolated from denture-related stomatitis in elderly patients: Antifungal susceptibility and production of virulence attributes

Subject: Life Science and Biomedicine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 October 2020

Lourimar Viana Nascimento Franco de Sousa*
Affiliation:
Universidade Vale do Rio Doce (UNIVALE), Campus II, Governador Valadares, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Carlos Davi de Oliveira Maia
Affiliation:
Universidade Vale do Rio Doce (UNIVALE), Campus II, Governador Valadares, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Isadora Sousa Carvalho
Affiliation:
Universidade Vale do Rio Doce (UNIVALE), Campus II, Governador Valadares, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Juliano Meireles Prata
Affiliation:
Universidade Vale do Rio Doce (UNIVALE), Campus II, Governador Valadares, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Larissa Carla Rodrigues Arcanjo
Affiliation:
Universidade Vale do Rio Doce (UNIVALE), Campus II, Governador Valadares, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Marina de Figueiredo Vieira
Affiliation:
Universidade Vale do Rio Doce (UNIVALE), Campus II, Governador Valadares, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Matheus Batista Martins
Affiliation:
Universidade Vale do Rio Doce (UNIVALE), Campus II, Governador Valadares, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Thais Silveira Pereira
Affiliation:
Universidade Vale do Rio Doce (UNIVALE), Campus II, Governador Valadares, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Lucieri Olegário Pereira Souza
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Estudos Avançados de Microrganismos Emergentes e Resistentes (LEAMER), Departamento de Microbiologia Geral, Instituto de Microbiologia Paulo de Góes (IMPG), Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Anna Clara Milesi Galdino
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Estudos Avançados de Microrganismos Emergentes e Resistentes (LEAMER), Departamento de Microbiologia Geral, Instituto de Microbiologia Paulo de Góes (IMPG), Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Programa de Pós-Graduação em Bioquímica, Instituto de Química, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Marta Helena Branquinha
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Estudos Avançados de Microrganismos Emergentes e Resistentes (LEAMER), Departamento de Microbiologia Geral, Instituto de Microbiologia Paulo de Góes (IMPG), Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Heliara Maria Spina Canela
Affiliation:
Faculdades IESGO, Formosa, Goiás, Brazil
André Luis Souza Santos*
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Estudos Avançados de Microrganismos Emergentes e Resistentes (LEAMER), Departamento de Microbiologia Geral, Instituto de Microbiologia Paulo de Góes (IMPG), Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Programa de Pós-Graduação em Bioquímica, Instituto de Química, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
*
*Corresponding authors: Emails: lourimar.sousa@univale.br and andre@micro.ufrj.br
*Corresponding authors: Emails: lourimar.sousa@univale.br and andre@micro.ufrj.br

Abstract

Denture-related stomatitis caused by Candida spp. affects elderly individuals using partial/total prosthesis, provoking several discomforts including burning sensation and altered taste. Herein, we have studied 52 denture-wearing individuals (>60 years-old), attended at the dentistry clinic of UNIVALE, aiming to isolate Candida spp. directly from the stomatitis lesions and to evaluate their potential to produce virulence attributes. A low prevalence of denture-related stomatitis was reported in these patients (4/52; 7.7%). Candida albicans was isolated in the 4 selected patients, with the ability to form biofilm over a polystyrene surface and to produce aspartic protease, esterase and hemolysin. However, neither phospholipase nor caseinase activities were detected. Planktonic-growing yeasts were susceptible to amphotericin B and caspofungin, while the susceptibility to azoles (fluconazol, itraconazole and voriconazole) varied depending on either the isolate or antifungal. Relevantly, biofilm-forming C. albicans cells exhibited resistance to all studied antifungals. So, new effective drugs against resistant C. albicans isolates causing denture-related stomatitis are urgently required.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Result type: Novel result
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Table 1. Demographic and oral characteristics of studied patients.

Figure 1

Table 2. Hydrolytic enzyme production and biofilm formation by oral isolates of Candida albicans recovered from denture-related stomatitis.

Figure 2

Table 3. Susceptibility profiles of both planktonic- and biofilm-forming cells of oral isolates of Candida albicans recovered from denture-related stomatitis to different classical antifungals.

Reviewing editor:  Alicja Dabrowska Cambridge University, Department of Physics, Cambridge, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, CB2 1TN
This article has been accepted because it is deemed to be scientifically sound, has the correct controls, has appropriate methodology and is statistically valid, and met required revisions.

Review 1: Candida albicans isolated from denture-related stomatitis in elderly patients: antifungal susceptibility profiles and production of potential virulence attributes

Conflict of interest statement

no

Comments

Comments to the Author: Swab method is not appropriate as we showed in this manuscript “Laboratory‐Based Investigation of Denture Sonication Method in Patients with Candida‐Associated Denture Stomatitis”. Please, stress the limitation of the study and add this manuscript as reference.

Presentation

Overall score 4 out of 5
Is the article written in clear and proper English? (30%)
4 out of 5
Is the data presented in the most useful manner? (40%)
4 out of 5
Does the paper cite relevant and related articles appropriately? (30%)
4 out of 5

Context

Overall score 5 out of 5
Does the title suitably represent the article? (25%)
5 out of 5
Does the abstract correctly embody the content of the article? (25%)
5 out of 5
Does the introduction give appropriate context? (25%)
5 out of 5
Is the objective of the experiment clearly defined? (25%)
5 out of 5

Analysis

Overall score 3.8 out of 5
Does the discussion adequately interpret the results presented? (40%)
4 out of 5
Is the conclusion consistent with the results and discussion? (40%)
4 out of 5
Are the limitations of the experiment as well as the contributions of the experiment clearly outlined? (20%)
3 out of 5

Review 2: Candida albicans isolated from denture-related stomatitis in elderly patients: antifungal susceptibility profiles and production of potential virulence attributes

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

Comments to the Author: This is a small, overall well-presented study with clear tables. Before publication, the authors should address the following points:

1. Briefly discuss the limitations of this study, especially the small number of stomatitis patients under investigation.

2. Simplify the title. For example, “…and production of potential virulence attributes” may be shortended to “…and potential virulence attributes/factors” or “…and production of virulence attributes/factors”.

3. Expand Statistics section (page 5). Are these standard deviations in Table 2?

4. Define “Pz values” in the main text (page 5).

5. Amend “all patients” (page 6) to “all stomatitis patients” for clarity.

6. Simplify long and complex sentences like those starting with “Candida was directly isolated…” (page 5) and “To worsen this scenario, …” (page 6).

7. Proof-read the entire text for minor language inconsistencies including small grammatical errors.

Presentation

Overall score 4.4 out of 5
Is the article written in clear and proper English? (30%)
4 out of 5
Is the data presented in the most useful manner? (40%)
5 out of 5
Does the paper cite relevant and related articles appropriately? (30%)
4 out of 5

Context

Overall score 4.5 out of 5
Does the title suitably represent the article? (25%)
4 out of 5
Does the abstract correctly embody the content of the article? (25%)
5 out of 5
Does the introduction give appropriate context? (25%)
4 out of 5
Is the objective of the experiment clearly defined? (25%)
5 out of 5

Analysis

Overall score 4.2 out of 5
Does the discussion adequately interpret the results presented? (40%)
4 out of 5
Is the conclusion consistent with the results and discussion? (40%)
5 out of 5
Are the limitations of the experiment as well as the contributions of the experiment clearly outlined? (20%)
3 out of 5