Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-4ws75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-06T08:48:03.291Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Embodied music training can help improve speech imitation and pronunciation skills

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2024

Yuan Zhang*
Affiliation:
Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
Florence Baills
Affiliation:
University of Lleida, Lleida, Catalonia
Pilar Prieto
Affiliation:
Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Catalonia
*
Corresponding author: Yuan Zhang; Email: yuan.zhang@zju.edu.cn
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recent research has shown that music interventions involving body movements are beneficial for reinforcing music learning. Given the reported positive transfer between music training and phonological skills, we investigated, for the first time, the value of an embodied music training program for improving pronunciation skills. In a classroom experiment, 48 Chinese adolescent learners of English participated in three 40-minute sessions of either Dalcroze-inspired embodied music training or treatment-as-usual non-embodied music training. Participants in the embodied music group were involved in a series of activities designed to develop their rhythmic and melodic skills through bodily experiences. Participants in the non-embodied music group followed music lessons designed by their music teacher, appreciating music pieces and receiving music knowledge. Before and after training, participants were tested with a language imitation task using six unfamiliar languages and an oral reading task in second language English. Results show that the embodied music group significantly outperformed the non-embodied music group in both tasks. Overall, our findings suggest that an embodied music training program has beneficial effects on pronunciation skills, supporting an embodied-based language teaching approach.

Information

Type
Study
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. Overall experimental procedure.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Screenshots of activities in the EMG.Note: Ordered from top left to bottom right: Move to rhythmic patterns (S1), Rhythmic body percussion Part 2 (S2), Move to the changes of the music scale (S2), Balloon games: tapp to the beat (S3)

Figure 2

Table 1. Mean, std. deviation, std. error, and 95% confidence interval for the rating scores of accentedness at pretest and posttest across groups

Figure 3

Table 2. GLMM: Fixed effects of the mean accentedness rating scores in the speech imitation task

Figure 4

Table 3. Mean, std. deviation, std. error, and a 95% confidence interval for the rating scores at pretest and posttest across groups

Figure 5

Table 4. Results of the five GLMMs for the mean rating scores

Figure 6

Figure 3. Estimated means across groups at pre- and posttest in terms of accentedness, comprehensibility, fluency, segmental accuracy, and suprasegmental accuracy.

Figure 7

Table 5. Mean, std. deviation, std. error, and a 95% confidence interval for the satisfaction questionnaire across groups

Figure 8

Table 6. Summary of the three GLMMs: Fixed effects of the scores for the satisfaction questionnaire

Supplementary material: File

Zhang et al. supplementary material

Zhang et al. supplementary material
Download Zhang et al. supplementary material(File)
File 29.6 KB