Hostname: page-component-5db58dd55d-lqwgf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-31T19:39:24.299Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

U-shaped power: Infantas and the ritual-political nexus of Formative-period monumentality in the Chillón Valley, Perú

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 July 2025

Christian Mesía-Montenegro Open the ORCID record for Christian Mesía-Montenegro [Opens in a new window] ,
Miguel Cornejo-Guerrero Open the ORCID record for Miguel Cornejo-Guerrero [Opens in a new window]  and
Angel Sanchez-Borjas Open the ORCID record for Angel Sanchez-Borjas [Opens in a new window]
Christian Mesía-Montenegro*
Affiliation:
Dirección de Investigación, Innovación y Sostenibilidad, Universidad Privada del Norte, Lima, Perú
Miguel Cornejo-Guerrero
Affiliation:
Escuela de Arqueología, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima, Perú
Angel Sanchez-Borjas
Affiliation:
Doctorado en Estudios Andinos, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Lima, Perú
*
Author for correspondence: Christian Mesía-Montenegro christian.mesia@upn.edu.pe
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Excavations at the Infantas complex in Chillón Valley, Perú, revealed a U-shaped monumental centre with a central mound, clay staircase and columned atrium. Aligned with structures from the Rímac and Lurín valleys, these complexes anchored ritual-political power, serving as hubs for ideological integration and territorial organisation in early Andean societies.

Keywords

South AmericaAndesFormative periodChavínembedded religiousnesspower dynamicssustainable heritage

Information

Type
Project Gallery
Information
Antiquity , Volume 99 , Issue 408 , December 2025 , e57
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NC
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original article is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained prior to any commercial use.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Antiquity Publications Ltd

Introduction

The U-shaped architectural tradition, a hallmark of the Andean Formative period (2100–200 BC; Williams Reference Williams1980), features monumental complexes consisting of central pyramidal mounds with two flanking arms enclosing large ceremonial plazas to create the characteristic ‘U’ shape. Concentrated in the Chillón, Rímac and Lurín valleys (Figure 1), these sites integrated religious authority, territorial organisation and sociopolitical cohesion, forming ritual-political hubs for early coastal societies. Some sites incorporated circular plazas (e.g. Cardal, Garagay), residential units (e.g. Mina Perdida) and infrastructure to control water flow (e.g. Manchay Bajo), suggesting the existence of inter-related ceremonial centres that fostered sociopolitical cohesion (Burger & Salazar Reference Burger, Salazar, Burger and Nesbitt2023) and factional competition within a peer polity system (Renfrew & Cherry Reference Renfrew and Cherry.1986; Brumfiel Reference Brumfiel, Miller, Rowlands and Tilley2005; Erwin Reference Erwin, McGlade and van der Leeuw2013).

Figure 1.

Map showing the locations of U-shaped buildings in the Chillon, Rimac and Lurin valleys (figure by authors).

Infantas, a U-shaped complex in the Chillón Valley now encroached upon by the urban sprawl of Peru’s capital city, provides key insights into the mediation of power and ideology. The Chillón Valley contained at least seven U-shaped structures, with Infantas positioned in the lower valley alongside El Paraíso, Chuquitanta A and Chuquitanta B (Mesia-Montenegro Reference Mesia-Montenegro2024), paralleling the lower-valley concentration of complexes observed in the Rímac and Lurín valleys (Silva & García Reference Silva and García.1997).

Infantas

Identified in 1940s aerial photographs (Silva Reference Silva1998), Infantas lies about 7km from the Pacific coast. Urban expansion has fragmented the complex into the central mound (Infantas I) and part of the left arm (Infantas II) (Figure 2). Excavations in 2008 revealed a monumental clay staircase, an atrium with white plaster flooring and adobe columns, all integral to the main mound. These features, though partially dismantled during Late Intermediate (AD 1000–1450) and Inka (AD 1450–1532) occupations, indicate that the complex was a significant ceremonial centre (Cornejo-Guerrero Reference Cornejo-Guerrero and Pinedo2021).

Figure 2.

Infantas: a) the Infantas complex and current urbanisation; b) reconstruction of Infantas (figure by authors).

Two excavation areas (AE-1 & AE-2) investigated the main mound (Figure 3). In AE-1, located at the summit, 12 excavation units of 2 × 2m were established. This area showed substantial disturbance due to looting and later occupations, predominantly yielding burials from the Late Intermediate and Inka periods. In contrast, the 12 × 1m trench in AE-2, situated on the north-east flank of the mound, revealed a well-preserved 30-step staircase leading to an atrium platform (Figure 4). The staircase, constructed with stone slabs bonded by mud mortar, closely parallels those found at Cardal and Mina Perdida (Burger & Salazar Reference Burger, Salazar., Burger and Makowski2009).

Figure 3.

Orthophotos of a) excavation units AE-1 and AE-2 at the main mound and b) excavation units at AE-2, note the staircase trench (figure by authors).

Figure 4.

Views of the excavations at units AE-1 and AE-2, from above (a) and looking east (d), and an orthophoto (b) and excavation photograph (c) of the staircase trench excavations (figure by authors).

Excavation of the atrium in six 2 × 2m units uncovered column foundations and a white-plastered floor (Figure 5), architectural elements characteristic of Formative-period temples (e.g. Garagay and Mina Perdida; Ravines & Isbell Reference Ravines and Isbell.1975; Burger & Salazar Reference Burger, Salazar., Burger and Makowski2009). The identification of conical adobe bricks further substantiates this affiliation, while scarce Formative-period fragments exhibit Janabarroid motifs (800–550 BC) (Figure 6), suggesting ties to Ancón and Garagay (Ravines et al. Reference Ravines, Engelstad, Palomino and Sandweiss.1982; Rosas Reference Rosas2007). While limited in quantity, these parallels hint at broader interaction networks (Mesia-Montenegro Reference Mesia-Montenegro2024).

Figure 5.

Atrium excavations: a) west view of grid 14 at AE-2, note the column base; b) north view of grid 14 at AE-2, note the column base (figure by authors).

Figure 6.

Fragments of Formative ceramics retrieved from grid 14 at AE-2 (figure by authors).

Discussion

Strategic placement of U-shaped complexes in lower valleys marked control over agricultural and hydrological resources. U-shaped buildings also reflect environmental adaptation strategies. In the Lurín Valley, sites such as Manchay Bajo incorporated retaining walls to mitigate flood risks (Burger Reference Burger2003). The strategic placement of Infantas indicates a similar integration of ceremonial and environmental functions in the Chillón Valley.

The presence of monumental staircases, atriums and columned spaces suggests a shared architectural expression among Formative-period sites in the Central Andes, while similarities in ceramics suggest interaction between contemporaneous sites. The central mound symbolically elevated authority, as seen in Cardal, Mina Perdida and Garagay, while plazas and staircases facilitated communal rituals (Moore Reference Moore1996).

U-shaped complexes such as Infantas exemplify the concept of ‘embedded religiousness’, in which architecture, ideology and governance were deeply intertwined (Mesia-Montenegro & Sanchez-Borjas Reference Mesia-Montenegro and Sanchez-Borjas.2023). The construction of these monuments may have represented a fundamental component of religious practice, holding a significance comparable to the rituals and ceremonies performed within the completed structures.

The decline of U-shaped monumental traditions around 500 BC coincides with shifts in regional religious and political landscapes, including the rise of Chavín as a dominant religious centre (Mesia-Montenegro Reference Mesia-Montenegro2024), and with environmental disruptions linked to El Niño events (Sandweiss et al. Reference Sandweiss, Shady, Moseley, Keefer and Ortloff.2009).

Conclusion

Infantas exemplifies the architectural, religious and sociopolitical significance of U-shaped monumental complexes during the Andean Formative period. Beyond its regional importance, Infantas serves as a compelling case study on the effects of modern urbanisation on archaeological sites worldwide; the entire right wing and 90 per cent of the left wing have been lost to urban expansion. Archaeological excavations played a pivotal role in securing legal protection for the site, leading to its designation as National Heritage.

Despite extensive destruction, surviving architecture confirms integration of the site within a broader ceremonial network. Future research, including radiocarbon dating and excavations at Infantas and other U-shaped complexes (Figure 1), will refine the chronology and regional connections of Infantas and the wider U-shaped architectural tradition.

Acknowledgements

Special thanks to the Peruvian Ministry of Culture, the Los Olivos Municipality and all fieldwork participants.

Funding statement

Funding was secured by the Los Olivos Municipality, Lima, Perú.

Data availability

Excavated materials are curated at the Museo Nacional de Arqueología, Antropología e Historia del Perú.

References

Brumfiel, E.M. 2005. Factional competition in complex society, in Miller, D., Rowlands, M. & Tilley, C. (ed.) Domination and resistance: 148–60. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Burger, R. 2003. El Nino, early Peruvian civilization, and human agency: some thoughts from the Lurin Valley. Fieldiana Botany 43: 90–107.Google Scholar
Burger, R. & Salazar., L. 2009. Investigaciones Arqueológicas en Mina Perdida. Valle de Lurín, in Burger, R. & Makowski, K. (ed.) Arqueología del Período Formativo en la Cuenca Baja de Lurín: 37–58. Lima: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Peru. https://doi.org/10.18800/9789972428821.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burger, R. & Salazar, L. . 2023. Transformation and continuity along the central coast of Peru during the first millennium BC and the impact of the Chavín phenomenon, in Burger, R. & Nesbitt, J. (ed.) Reconsidering the Chavín phenomenon in the twenty-first century: 237–70. Washington, D.C.: Dumbarton Oaks.Google Scholar
Cornejo-Guerrero, M. 2021. La industria cerámica en la huaca Naranjal y el Curacazgo de Aznapuquio, in Pinedo, O. (ed.) La arqueología de Lima norte: 151–93. Lima: Avqui.Google Scholar
Erwin, H.R. 2013. The dynamics of peer polities, in McGlade, J. & van der Leeuw, S.E. (ed.) Time, process and structured transformation in archaeology: 57–96. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mesia-Montenegro, C. 2024. Untangling the chronological complexities of the Andean Central Coast Formative period: a Bayesian reassessment. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2024.104799 Google Scholar
Mesia-Montenegro, C. & Sanchez-Borjas., A. 2023. Embedded religiousness and the Kotosh religious tradition in highland Peru: the site of La Seductora. Antiquity 97: 367–85. https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2023.17 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, J.D. 1996. Architecture and power in the ancient Andes: the archaeology of public buildings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ravines, R. & Isbell., W. 1975. Garagay: sitio temprano en el Valle de Lima. Revista del Museo Nacional 41: 253–72.Google Scholar
Ravines, R., Engelstad, H., Palomino, V. & Sandweiss., D. 1982. Materiales arqueológicos de Garagay. Revista del Museo Nacional 46: 135–233.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C. & Cherry., J.F. 1986. Peer polity interaction and socio-political change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rosas, H. 2007. La secuencia cultural del período Formativo de Ancón. Lima: Avqi.Google Scholar
Sandweiss, D., Shady, R., Moseley, M., Keefer, D. & Ortloff., C. 2009. Environmental change and economic development in coastal Peru between 5,800 and 3,600 years ago. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 106: 1359–63. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0812645106 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silva, J. 1998. Una aproximación al Periodo Formativo en el valle del Chillón. Boletín de Arqueología PUCP 2: 251–68. https://doi.org/10.18800/boletindearqueologiapucp.199801.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva, J. & García., R. 1997. Huachipa-Jicamarca: cronología y desarrollo sociopolítico en el Rímac. Instituto Francés de Estudios Andinos 26: 195–228.Google Scholar
Williams, C. 1980. Complejos de pirámides con planta en U: patrón arquitectónico de la costa central. Revista del Museo Nacional 44: 95–110.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. Map showing the locations of U-shaped buildings in the Chillon, Rimac and Lurin valleys (figure by authors).

Figure 1

Figure 2. Infantas: a) the Infantas complex and current urbanisation; b) reconstruction of Infantas (figure by authors).

Figure 2

Figure 3. Orthophotos of a) excavation units AE-1 and AE-2 at the main mound and b) excavation units at AE-2, note the staircase trench (figure by authors).

Figure 3

Figure 4. Views of the excavations at units AE-1 and AE-2, from above (a) and looking east (d), and an orthophoto (b) and excavation photograph (c) of the staircase trench excavations (figure by authors).

Figure 4

Figure 5. Atrium excavations: a) west view of grid 14 at AE-2, note the column base; b) north view of grid 14 at AE-2, note the column base (figure by authors).

Figure 5

Figure 6. Fragments of Formative ceramics retrieved from grid 14 at AE-2 (figure by authors).