Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-nf276 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-15T04:00:25.162Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Glacier thermal regime and suspended-sediment yield: a comparison of two high-Arctic glaciers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

A. J. Hodson
Affiliation:
School of Geography, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3TB, England
M. Tranter
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1SS, England
J. A. Dowdeswell
Affiliation:
Centre for Glaciology, Institute of Earth Studies, The University of Wales, Aberystwyth, Dyfed ST23 3DBWales.
A. M. Gurnell
Affiliation:
School of Geography, University of Birmingham B15 2TT, England
J. O. Hagen
Affiliation:
Department of Physical Geography, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1042 Blindern, N-0316 OsloNorway.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper compares estimates of suspended-sediment yield and discharge from two glacier basins in Svalhard exhibiting contrasting glacial thermal regimes: Austre Brøggerbreen (~12 km2), which is almost entirely cold-based, and Finsterwalderbreen (~44 km2), dominated by warm basal ice. There are marked differences in the magnitude and temporal pattern of mean daily discharge and mean daily suspended-sediment concentration from the two glacier basins. Specific suspended-sediment yields from Finsterwalderbreen (710–2900 t km−2 a−1) were more than one order of magnitude greater than at Austre Brøggerbreen (81–110 t km−2 a−1). These differences are ascribed to the influence of thermal regime upon the meltwater drainage system and the predominant sources of suspended sediment. The potential significance of glacier thermal regime is further explored using studies from other glacier basins in Svalbard. Variations in thermal regime resulting from mass-balance adjustments since the termination of the Little Ice Age are also examined.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 1997 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. The Svalbard archipelago and the locations of glacier basins with known suspended-sediment yields. The glacier basins are numbered in order of increasing glacier area: 1, (Barsch and others, 1994); 2, Bjuvbreen (Hamilton, 1992); Д Glopbreen (Barsch and others, 1994); 4, Scott Turnerbreen (Hodgkins, 1996); 5, Austre Brøggerbreen UGS (Hodson and cithers, in press); 6, 7, Hannabreen, Erikbreen (Sollid and others, 1994); 8, Brøggerbreen LGS (Hodson and others, in press); 9, Ebbabreen (Kostrzewski and others, 1989); 10, Werenskioldbreen (Krawczyk and Opolka-Gadek, 1994); 11, Finsterwalderbreen; 12, Kongsvegen (Elverhøi and others, 1980).

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Time series of mean daily discharge (m3 s−1) and suspended-sediment concentration (SSC: gl−1) for Austre Brøggerbreen UGS and Finsterwalderbreen. A logarithmic scale has been adopted for the Finsterwalderbreen SSC data.

Figure 2

Table 1. Annual discharge and specific sediment yield estimates for Brøggerbreen and Finsterwalderbreen catchments

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Observations and simple regression relationship between annual sediment yield (t a−1) and annual discharge (m3 × 106 a−1) for the 12 Svalbard glaciers denoted in Figure 1.

Figure 4

Table 2. Indices of the relative proportion of warm basal ice for five Svalbard glaciers. Wl is the proportion of warm basal ice beneath the glacier centre flow, and Wd is the normalised thickness of warm ice at the estimated equilibrium-line altitude

Figure 5

Table 3. Correlation matrix between log10 ASY (annual sediment yield), log10 AD (annual discharge), Wl and Wd (definedin Table 2)