Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-pkds5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-29T04:50:12.801Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bioelectrical impedance is a useful adjunctive tool in assessing nutritional status in systemic sclerosis patients with gastrointestinal symptoms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2010

N. M. Thoua ,
C. P. Denton ,
A. V. Emmanuel  and
A. Forbes
N. M. Thoua
Affiliation:
GI Physiology Unit, University College Hospital, 235 Euston Road, London NW1 2BU, UK
C. P. Denton
Affiliation:
Rheumatology Department, Royal Free Hospital, Pond Street, London NW3 2QG, UK
A. V. Emmanuel
Affiliation:
GI Physiology Unit, University College Hospital, 235 Euston Road, London NW1 2BU, UK
A. Forbes
Affiliation:
GI Physiology Unit, University College Hospital, 235 Euston Road, London NW1 2BU, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is an autoimmune disorder which can affect multiple organs. The gastrointestinal (GI) tract is affected in up to 90% of patients and although in a small minority of patients severe GI involvement may lead to intestinal failure and malnutrition, the effect of less severe GI involvement in nutritional status is not known. The aim of this study was to investigate the nutritional status of SSc patients with or without moderate intestinal symptoms.

Thirty-five SSc patients (25 with diffuse and 10 with limited cutaneous SSc) referred to a tertiary referral centre were studied. Nineteen patients (16 female) reported moderate to severe GI symptoms (Sx) and 16 patients (all female) reported minimal GI symptoms (ASx). All patients had anthropometric measurements (weight, height, mid-arm circumference and triceps skinfold thickness), indirect calorimetry for measurement of resting energy expenditure (REE) and bioelectrical impedance (BIA) for assessment of body composition.

Results are given as median and 25–75% range. The median age of all patients was 58 years (52–65), disease duration 7.5 years (3.7–13.5), no difference between the 2 groups. There was no significant difference in the anthropometric measurements between the 2 groups, BMI: Sx 23 (19.5–25.5) versus ASx 23.15 (10–24.9); P=NS. The REE expenditure was lower in the Sx group (REE: Sx 1170 [1000–1368] versus ASx 1289 [1189–1382]; REE % predicted: Sx 90 [82–100] versus ASx 100 [92–106]; P<0.02). BIA data are shown in the table.

GI involvement is common in SSc and can affect both nutrient intake and absorption. Even in the absence of weight loss and normal anthropometric measurements, patients with moderate to severe GI symptoms, have altered body composition with higher extracellular water volume and lower fat mass as assessed with BIA. These differences may just be a reflection of chronic illness and are not necessarily a marker of sub-clinical malnutrition. Longitudinal studies in SSc patients would be helpful in understanding better both these changes and the role of BIA as a tool for nutritional assessment and prognostic modelling.