Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- Tables and Figures
- Acknowledgments
- List of acronyms
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Ideological Origins of Open Standards I: Telegraph and Engineering Standards, 1860s–1900s
- 3 Ideological Origins of Open Standards II: American Standards, 1910s–1930s
- 4 Standardization and the Monopoly Bell System, 1880s–1930s
- 5 Critiques of Centralized Control, 1930s–1970s
- 6 International Standards for the Convergence of Computers and Communications, 1960s–1970s
- 7 Open Systems and the Limits of Democratic Design, 1970s–1980s
- 8 The Internet and the Advantages of Autocratic Design, 1970s–1990s
- 9 Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
7 - Open Systems and the Limits of Democratic Design, 1970s–1980s
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2014
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- Tables and Figures
- Acknowledgments
- List of acronyms
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Ideological Origins of Open Standards I: Telegraph and Engineering Standards, 1860s–1900s
- 3 Ideological Origins of Open Standards II: American Standards, 1910s–1930s
- 4 Standardization and the Monopoly Bell System, 1880s–1930s
- 5 Critiques of Centralized Control, 1930s–1970s
- 6 International Standards for the Convergence of Computers and Communications, 1960s–1970s
- 7 Open Systems and the Limits of Democratic Design, 1970s–1980s
- 8 The Internet and the Advantages of Autocratic Design, 1970s–1990s
- 9 Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
Networks are political issues at government or corporate levels. In hush statements, communications and computer organizations leak their feelings that the other guys had better mind their own business. Since they are big, and more or less monopolies, each scrambles at shaping the world into specific designs before the others do it. Lost in the turmoil is the user. He has no strategy, no power. He thinks the big brothers know what they’re doing. No doubt, there are some who do. Take for example our beloved friend IBM.
– Louis Pouzin, “The Communications Network Snarl,” 1975The promise of data networking was evident to everyone who worked near the intersections of digital computer and communication technologies. The Bell Labs economist Jeffrey Rohlfs articulated the new conventional wisdom in a pioneering 1974 article, in which he based his “theory of interdependent demand for a communications service” on a forceful assertion: “The utility that a subscriber derives from a communication service increases as others join the system.” Rohlfs theorized and mathematized the lessons that the packet-switching researchers we met in Chapter 6 – such as Louis Pouzin, Vinton Cerf, Robert Kahn, Rémi Déspres, and Marc Levilion – understood intuitively: the value of a digital computer-communication network would reside primarily in its ability to facilitate and sustain interconnections on an ever-increasing scale.
As we have seen, these packet-switching researchers gained firsthand experience with the obstacles that prevented the universal adoption of new standards for data networking. As the “virtual circuit versus datagram” controversy described in Chapter 6 demonstrated, many technical disagreements mapped directly to conflicting strategic priorities and conflicting visions of control: telecommunications engineers used virtual circuits to keep more control inside the network, but computer engineers favored connectionless datagrams to shift control to the computers at the edges of the network. As positions hardened in the mid-1970s and it became clear that the argument was unlikely to be settled on technical merits alone, the network engineers we will meet in this chapter sought to create effective alliances that could constrain and direct the creation of international networking standards.
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Open Standards and the Digital AgeHistory, Ideology, and Networks, pp. 197 - 228Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2014
References
, “A Theory of Interdependent Demand for a Communications Service,” Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 5 (1974): 16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Information Technology Standards: Quest for the Common Byte (Boston: Digital Press, 1995), 11Google Scholar
, “Recasting the Organizational Synthesis: Structure and Process in the Twentieth and Twenty-First Centuries,” Business History Review 79 (2005): 1–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Jr., The Mythical Man-Month: Essays on Software Engineering Anniversary Edition (Boston: Addison-Wesley, 1995), 40–50Google Scholar
, “Standardization: Understanding the Process,” Journal of the American Society for Information Science 43 (1992): 550–5553.0.CO;2-L>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , The International Organization for Standardization (ISO): Global Governance through Voluntary Consensus (New York: Routledge, 2009)Google Scholar
, “OSI Reference Model – The ISO Model of Architecture for Open Systems Interconnection,” IEEE Transactions on Communications 28 (1980): 425–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Data Communications at the National Physical Laboratory (1965–1975),” IEEE Annals of the History of Computing 9 (1988): 221–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Early Experiences with the Arpanet and Internet in the United Kingdom,” IEEE Annals of the History of Computing 21 (1999): 38–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, The Politics of Telecommunications: National Institutions, Convergences, and Change in Britain and France (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, The Political Economy of Anticipatory Standards: The Case of the Open System Interconnection Reference Model (MA thesis, Oxford University, 1995): 44–45
, Committee X3 Organization Manual (New York: American National Standards Institute, 1970)Google Scholar
, “Standards for Open Network Operation,” Computer Communications 1 (1978): 5–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Accredited Standards Committee for Information Processing Systems, X3,” Computer Standards and Interfaces 5 (1986): 189–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Summary of Current Work, ANSI/X3/SPARC/Study Group – Database Systems,” Bulletin of ACM SIGMOD (1974): 16–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “The Origin of the Integrated Data Store (IDS): The First Direct-Access DBMS,” IEEE Annals of the History of Computing 31 (2009): 42–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Overview and Status of the ISO Reference Model of Open Systems Interconnection,” Computer Networks 5 (1981): 77–80Google Scholar
, “Modularity in the Design and Standardisation of Open Systems,” Computer Networks 8 (1984): 49–55Google Scholar
, Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society (Boston: Harvard University Press, 1988)Google Scholar
, “Modularity in Technology and Organizations,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 49 (2002): 19–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Modularity: An Interdisciplinary History of an Ordering Concept,” Information & Culture: A Journal of History 47 (2012): 257–287Google Scholar
, Information Technology Standardization: Theory, Process, and Organizations (Bedford, MA: Digital Press, 1989)Google Scholar
, Patterns in Network Architecture: A Return to Fundamentals (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall PTR, 2007), 358Google Scholar
and , Open Systems Networking: TCP/IP and OSI (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1993); Pelkey, “Entrepreneurial Capitalism and Innovation,” chapter 9Google Scholar
, Two Bits: The Cultural Significance of Free Software (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2008), 143–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Computer Communications in the Eighties – Time to Put It All Together,” Computer Networks 5 (1981): 3–8Google Scholar
, “External Economies and Economic Progress: The Case of the Microcomputer Industry,” Business History Review 66 (1992): 1–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Afterword: Evolving Towards OSI,” Proceedings of the IEEE 71 (1983): 1446–1448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “MAP: GM and Boeing Promise a Real Four-Bus Circus,” Data Communications (October 1985): 78–79Google Scholar
, “Standardization in IT – Current Developments and Users’ Response,” Computer Standards & Interfaces 5 (1986): 277–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Recent Developments in European Community Policy to Promote a Harmonized Implementation of OSI Standards,” Computer Networks & Interfaces 5 (1986): 225–227Google Scholar
, Jr., Inventing the Electronic Century: The Epic Story of the Consumer Electronics and Computer Industries (New York: Free Press, 2001), 177–189Google Scholar
, High-Tech Europe: The Politics of International Cooperation (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992)Google Scholar
, “Ten Years of OSI – Maturity or Infancy?” Computer Networks and ISDN Systems 23 (1991): 14Google Scholar
, , and , “Architectural Directions for Opening IBM Networks: The Case of OSI,” IBM Systems Journal 31 (1992): 313–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Federal Networking Standards: Policy Issues,” StandardView 2 (1994): 218–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Open Systems Standardization: A Business Approach (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall PTR, 1997), 70Google Scholar
, The Open Book: A Practical Perspective on OSI (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1990)Google Scholar
, Communicating for Cooperating Systems: OSI, SNA, and TCP/IP (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1991)Google Scholar
, UNIX, POSIX, and Open Systems: The Open Standards Puzzle (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1992)Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this chapter is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.