Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-pkds5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-29T01:43:25.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What is Utility?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2008

D. W. Haslett
D. W. Haslett
Affiliation:
University of Delaware
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Social scientists could learn some useful things from philosophy. Here I shall discuss what I take to be one such thing: a better understanding of the concept of utility. There are several reasons why a better understanding may be useful. First, this concept is commonly found in the writings of social scientists, especially economists (see, for example, Sen and Williams, 1982). Second, utility is the main ingredient in utilitarianism, a perspective on morality that, traditionally, has been very influential among social scientists. Third, and most important, with a better understanding of utility comes, as I shall try to show here, a better understanding of “personal welfare”. or, in other words, of what may be said to be in people's best interests. Such an understanding is useful to social scientists and philosophers alike, whether for utilitarian purposes or not.

Information

Type
Essays
Information
Economics & Philosophy , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , April 1990 , pp. 65 - 94
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Arrow, Kenneth J., and Hahn, F. H. 1971. General Competitive Analysis. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. 1789. The Principles of Morals and Legislation.Google Scholar
Brandt, Richard B. 1982. “Two Concepts of Utility”. In The Limits of Utilitarianism, edited by Miller, Harlan B. and Williams, William H., pp. 169–85. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Broome, J. A. 1978. “Choice and Value in Economics”. Oxford Economic Papers 30:313–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debreu, G. 1959. The Theory of Value. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1939. Theory of Valuation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 1978. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Etzioni, Amitai. 1986. “The Case for a Multiple-Utility Conception”. Economics and Philosophy 2:159–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauthier, David. 1986. Morals by Agreement. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Glover, Jonathan. 1977. Causing Death and Saving Lives. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Grice, Russell. 1967. The Grounds of Moral Judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Griffin, James. 1986. Well-Being. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Hare, R. M. 1981. Moral Thinking: Its Levels, Method and Point. Oxford: Clarendon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harsanyi, John C. 1982. “Morality and the Theory of Rational Behavior”. In Utilitarianism and Beyond, edited by Sen, Amartya and Williams, Bernard, pp. 39–62. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harsanyi, John C. 1987. Equal Consideration: A Theory of Moral justification. Newark: University of Delaware Press; London and Toronto: Associated University Presses.Google Scholar
Hicks, J. R. 1939. Value and Capital. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hirshleifer, Jack. 1976. Price Theory and Applications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Lewis, C. I. 1946. An Analysis of Knowledge and Valuation. LaSalle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1861. Utilitarianism.Google Scholar
Narveson, Jan F. 1967. Morality and Utility. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nozick, Robert. 1974. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Parfit, Derek. 1984. Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Pearce, David W. (editor). 1986. The MIT Dictionary of Modern Economics, 3rd ed.Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Joan. 1962. Economic Philosophy. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
Samuelson, Paul A. 1947. Foundations of Economic Analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sartorius, Rolf E. 1975. Individual Conduct and Social Norms. Encino, CA: Dickenson.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Thomas. 1982. “Human Welfare: What It Is Not”. In The Limits of Utilitarianism, edited by Miller, Harlan B. and Williams, William H., pp. 195–206. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya K. 1977. “Rational Fools”. Philosophy and Public Affairs 6:317–44.Google Scholar
Sen, Armartya, and Williams, Barnard (editors). 1982. Utilitarianism and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sidgwick, Henry. 1907. The Method of Ethics, 7th ed.London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Smart, J. J. C. 1973. “An Outline of a System of Utilitarian Ethics”. In Utilitarianism: For and Against, edited by Smart, J. J. C. and Williams, Bernard, pp. 3–74. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sumner, L. W. 1981. Abortion and Moral Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar